is there a downside to combining search fields with copyfield?

2012-04-12 Thread geeky2
/is-there-a-downside-to-combining-search-fields-with-copyfield-tp3905349p3905349.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: is there a downside to combining search fields with copyfield?

2012-04-12 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 4/12/2012 7:27 AM, geeky2 wrote: currently, my schema has individual fields to search on. are there advantages or disadvantages to taking several of the individual search fields and combining them in to a single search field? would this affect search times, term tokenization or possibly

Re: is there a downside to combining search fields with copyfield?

2012-04-12 Thread geeky2
.472066.n3.nabble.com/is-there-a-downside-to-combining-search-fields-with-copyfield-tp3905349p3906265.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: is there a downside to combining search fields with copyfield?

2012-04-12 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 4/12/2012 1:37 PM, geeky2 wrote: can you elaborate on this and how EDisMax would preclude the need for copyfield? i am using extended dismax now in my response handlers. here is an example of one of my requestHandlers requestHandler name=partItemNoSearch class=solr.SearchHandler