Re: solr 1.3 Modification field in schema.xml

2008-11-17 Thread Noble Paul നോബിള്‍ नोब्ळ्
was field which use function for boosting, but I just tried to boost one > field indexed but not stored and it worked. > > Thanks a lot for putting some light on my questions, > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/solr-1.3--Modification-field-in-schema

RE: solr 1.3 Modification field in schema.xml

2008-11-17 Thread sunnyfr
you have to. It reduces disk access, index size, memory usage, etc. However, you have to balance this against future needs. If re-indexing is costly just to start storing 1 more field, it may be worth it to just leave it in. -Todd Feak -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/solr-1.

RE: solr 1.3 Modification field in schema.xml

2008-11-13 Thread Feak, Todd
EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 9:13 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: solr 1.3 Modification field in schema.xml Hi everybody, I don't get really when do I have to re index datas or not. I did a full import but I realised I stored too many fields which I don

solr 1.3 Modification field in schema.xml

2008-11-13 Thread sunnyfr
on my questions, -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/solr-1.3--Modification-field-in-schema.xml-tp20483691p20483691.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.