... Calissa yapar...
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Replication-is-not-Possible-on-RAMDirectory-tp4017766p4018670.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
There's an open issue (with a patch!) that enables this, it seems:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3911
Erik
On Nov 5, 2012, at 07:41 , deniz wrote:
Michael Della Bitta-2 wrote
No, RAMDirectory doesn't work for replication. Use MMapDirectory... it
ends up storing
there are mostly 16 or 32mb cache disks around (or i am checking
the wrong stuff? ) if so, that amount definitely too small...
-
Zeki ama calismiyor... Calissa yapar...
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Replication-is-not-Possible-on-RAMDirectory
Shawn Heisey-4 wrote
... transparently mapping the files on disk to a virtual memory space
and
using excess RAM to cache that data and make it fast. If you have
enough extra memory (disk cache) to fit the entire index, the OS will
never have to read any part of the index from disk more
-on-RAMDirectory-tp4017766p4018396.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Michael Della Bitta-2 wrote
No, RAMDirectory doesn't work for replication. Use MMapDirectory... it
ends up storing the index in RAM and more efficiently so, plus it's
backed by disk.
Just be sure to not set a big heap because MMapDirectory works outside of
heap.
for my tests, i dont think
On 11/4/2012 11:41 PM, deniz wrote:
Michael Della Bitta-2 wrote
No, RAMDirectory doesn't work for replication. Use MMapDirectory... it
ends up storing the index in RAM and more efficiently so, plus it's
backed by disk.
Just be sure to not set a big heap because MMapDirectory works outside
so it is not possible to use RAMdirectory for replication?
No, RAMDirectory doesn't work for replication. Use MMapDirectory... it
ends up storing the index in RAM and more efficiently so, plus it's
backed by disk.
Just be sure to not set a big heap because MMapDirectory works outside of heap
Hi all, I am trying to set up a master/slave system, by following this page :
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication
I was able to set up and did some experiments with that, but when i try to
set the index for RAMDirectory, i got errors for indexing.
While master and slave are both using
not interested in RAMDirectory.
However, I would like to better understand the oft-recommended and
currently-default MMapDirectory, and what the tradeoffs would be, when
using a 64-bit linux server dedicated to this single solr instance,
with plenty (more than 2x index size) of RAM, of storing the index
not intended to work with huge indexes Solr RAMDirectory.
Let me be clear that that I am not interested in RAMDirectory.
However, I would like to better understand the oft-recommended and
currently-default MMapDirectory, and what the tradeoffs would be, when
using a 64-bit linux server
On Oct 24, 2012, at 8:29 PM, Aaron Daubman daub...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings,
Most times I've seen the topic of storing one's index in memory, it
seems the asker was referring (or understood to be referring) to the
(in)famous not intended to work with huge indexes Solr RAMDirectory.
Let me
On 10/24/2012 6:29 PM, Aaron Daubman wrote:
Let me be clear that that I am not interested in RAMDirectory.
However, I would like to better understand the oft-recommended and
currently-default MMapDirectory, and what the tradeoffs would be, when
using a 64-bit linux server dedicated
Hello
I am using RAMDirectory for running some experiments and came up with a
weird (well, for me) situation. basically after indexing on RAM. i have
killed the JVM and then restarted it after some time. I can still see some
documents as indexed and searchable. I had indexed more than 2M docs
.
Regards,
Dmitry
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-3-1-core-with-RAMDirectory-isn-t-reloaded-tp2821875p2821875.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
generic, but
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-480 seems easier to use.
Thanks.
On 2/24/11 6:21 PM, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: I could not figure out how to setup the ramdirectory option in
solrconfig.XML. Does anyone have an example for 1.4?
it wasn't
I could not figure out how to setup the ramdirectory option in solrconfig.XML.
Does anyone have an example for 1.4?
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
: I could not figure out how to setup the ramdirectory option in
solrconfig.XML. Does anyone have an example for 1.4?
it wasn't an option in 1.4.
as Koji had already mentioned in the other thread where you chimed in
and asked about this, it was added in the 3x branch...
http://lucene.472066
to use.
Thanks.
On 2/24/11 6:21 PM, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: I could not figure out how to setup the ramdirectory option in
solrconfig.XML. Does anyone have an example for 1.4?
it wasn't an option in 1.4.
as Koji had already mentioned in the other thread where you
: Hello. We just recently started using a RAMDirectory with Solr and found a
: problem. When we restart the Solr, the RAMDirectory is refreshed as
: expected. Hwoever when we use the snapinstaller script to update the index,
: the RAMDirectory is not updated. Is there any way to update
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 3:36 PM, dipti khullar dipti.khul...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi
Can somebody let me know if its possible to configure RAMDirectory from
solrconfig.xml. Although its clearly mentioned in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-465 by Mark that he has worked
upon
Hi Dipti,
Just out of curiosity, are you trying to use RAMDirectory for improvement in
speed? I tried doing that and did not see any significant improvement. Would
be nice to know what your experiment shows.
- Raghu
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.comwrote
Hi
Can somebody let me know if its possible to configure RAMDirectory from
solrconfig.xml. Although its clearly mentioned in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-465 by Mark that he has worked
upon it, but still I couldn't find any such property in config file in Solr
1.4 latest download
It's possible, but requires a custom DirectoryFactory implementation.
There isn't a built in factory to construct a RAMDirectory. You wire
it into solrconfig.xml this way:
directoryFactory name=DirectoryFactory
class=[fully.qualified.classname]
!-- Parameters as required
Is it possible to configure Solr to fully load indexes in memory? I
wasn't able to find any documentation about this on either their site or
in the Solr 1.4 Enterprise Search Server book.
RAMDirectory
Is it possible to configure Solr to fully load indexes in memory? I
wasn't able to find any documentation about this on either their site or
in the Solr 1.4 Enterprise Search Server book.
What are you looking to do? Lucene inherently uses RAMDirectory under
the covers during indexing, but not sure if that is your interest.
-Grant
On Jun 1, 2008, at 5:09 PM, s d wrote:
Can i use RAMDirectory in SOLR?Thanks,
S
--
Grant Ingersoll
http
Can i use RAMDirectory in SOLR?Thanks,
S
Hi,
If you have enough RAM to load the whole index into RAM using RAMDirectory,
then you could also just use tmpfs to load your index in RAM... tmpfs exists
under Linux, Solaris, and BSD, I believe.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
Is there a way to use RAMDirectory with SOLR?If you can point me to
documentation that would be great.
Thanks,
S
HI,
Does any know how to use RAM disk for index?
Thanks,
Jae Joo
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RAMDirectory
HI,
Does any know how to use RAM disk for index?
Thanks,
Jae Jo,
32 matches
Mail list logo
