From the previos message in the list:
>>man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
>>
>>report_safe { 0 | 1 }(default: 1)
>>if this option is set to 1, if an incoming message is tagged as
>>spam, instead of modifying the original
>>message, SpamAssassin will create a new rep
Maybe I missed it in the docs, but I would like to see an
include directive available to the user_prefs file.
This would help me (maybe others) put some more automation into
black/whitelist management.
e.g.
include "/home/bilbo/.spamassassin/badboys.lst"
--
Regards
Cliff Sarginson
The
I've been looking at a bunch of files to determine
where and why SA either uses or does not use
a particular user pref from the database.
my intention is to purposely increase the score
of an existing rule, for example, if the username
of the email address USERNAME_IN_ADDRESS
rule is triggered I w
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 10:24:20PM +0100, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 the voices made Matt Kettler write:
>
> MK> Of course, said auto-delete procmail recipe is actually strongly advised
> MK> AGAINST by the actual developers of SA. SA's false-pos rate is not
> MK> sufficiently
Dan Hollis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The old SA method makes it easy to deal with spam with various email
> clients (eg elm, pine). The new method of making attachments out of
> mails makes it MUCH more difficult.
a) If you don't want the body modified, you still have that option (and
just
Shane Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I wasn't arguing for body reporting, I turned that off long ago. :->
>
> I guess I'm concerned that having the report_safe on by default is one
> step from it not being optional. As long as it's an option I can turn
> off, it's OK with me.
It will alw
Tony Hoyle said:
> Bayes isn't working on this machine (worked fine at home). I've primed it
> with a weeks' worth of ham/spam... how many messages does it need to be
> 'initialised'?
>
> debug: bayes corpus size: nspam = 762, nham = 1786
> --
> debug: cannot use bayes on this message; db not i
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 February 2003 17:38
> To: Tony Hoyle
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] db not initialised yet?
>
> that should be fine -- sounds like either (a) it's looking in
> the wrong
> path or (b) t
I'm recieveing the following error whenever spam is identified by
SpamAssassin:
Can't locate object method "head" via package
"Mail::SpamAssassin::MyMailAudit" (perhaps you forgot to load
"Mail::SpamAssassin::MyMailAudit"?) at
/usr/local/share/perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/AuditMessage.pm line
At 09:10 AM 02/21/2003, you wrote:
Well I sent a post while back on this and noone got it or at the time didn't
think of it as a of any use..
But as far as im concerned if they get blacklisted you should never see them
again.
That is the point of a blacklist...
I tried working something like this i
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 06:07:16PM -, Tony Hoyle wrote:
> debug: entering helper-app run mode
> razor2 check skipped: No such file or directory Can't locate
> Razor2/Client/Agent
> .pm in @INC (@INC contains: ../lib
> /home/duncf/spamassassin-nightly-build/spamas
> sassin/debian/spamassassin/us
Okay .. I found tools, no problem...
But .. since SA runs as a non-privledged user with no logon on a site-wide
install, how do you run the tools to see what that db has in it? SA wants
to see the db under /root/.spamassassin. SA runs as the user "filter" which
has no logon.
Ray
I need to tell SpamAssassin to not scan locally originating mail. Is
this done with whitelist_from or with a local rule or something else? If
local rule, how do I structure it?
I have sendmail-8.12.7 with MIMEDefang-2.29, SpamAssassin-2.43 and
ClamAV-0.54 on RH 6.2.
Thanks,
Rick Knight
([EMAIL
Does anyone have any idea on this one??
im using spamassassin 2.50
everything was working with 2.43
Dev.
- Original Message -
From: "Dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 11:33 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] error
> Im using qmail+vpopmail
> this is th
Here's a silly little thing that might potentially be useful to others
running SA 2.5 on Windows.
I added the following registry keys so I can spam/ham/forget a message from
the context menu, i.e. by right clicking on a saved .eml file.
[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Microsoft Internet Mail Message\shell\
Has anyone told fresmeat.net about the release?
--
Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge.
The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use.
Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTM
Interesting, have you linted your configfile? sounds like your spamassassin
configs are messed up and it's not parsing all your rules.
I get a MUCH higher score, and even without and DNSBLs and Razor it's
still over 5.0. I get 10.40 for a normal run, and 8.90 for a -L run.
Here's my detailed r
Shane Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I haven't seen the new behavior (partly because this discussion made
> me reconsider), and Theo's response eases my mind, but here are the
> reasons I think the change is maybe not such a good idea. (Really, as
> long as the old header_report and mimed
Michael,
Thanks for the reply.
> You should run spamassassin --lint to check for a syntax error in a rules
> file - maybe not all rules are running? I get the following result on
> sample-spam.txt with network tests turned off (much higher with them on):
Everything checked out sane - I should've
| things, I can't seem to install the module HTML::Parser because it can't
| find the file inttypes.h. It isn't on my system. I've done a
| search in the
| FAQ at http://spamassassin.taint.org/faq/index.cgi, and it
| doesn't find any
| hits. Where can I find the appropriate version of inttypes.h
20 matches
Mail list logo
