[SAtalk] spamass-milter and /etc/aliases

Hi, I have successfully installed spamass-milter together with SA and sendmail on RH8. On the mailserver there are no local accounts and all mails are routed to our internal mailserver via the /etc/aliases file. The mails which are going via aliases are parsed fine and if it´s spam the subject is

Re: [SAtalk] Bayesian filter with virtual users / files in MySQLDB?

Alexander, This seems to be a newly formed hot topic. I recently posted the question about how to share the Bayes DB across multiple equal cost MX machines and the only real way is to put the Bayes DB in the database. However there is no code in place currently to do that. The Bayes.pm file ne

Re: [SAtalk] vmailmgr and SA

Hi, You can do it in the .qmail-defaul |preline /usr/bin/spamc -f | /usr/bin/filepipe /usr/local/bin/vdeliver Filepipe is by Bruce Guenter (sorry for the spelling Bruce), but I keep a copy at http://www.nougen.com/test/filepipe.tgz Regards, Rick Jon Reynolds wrote: I am using vmailmgr and I

[SAtalk] timeout waiting for input from local during Draining Input

I get the following message periodically in my logs. Timeout waiting for input from local during Draining Input I'm running lastest sendmail on sol8 with procmail as LDA. Users .procmailrc kick off Spamassassin 2.54 in many cases, some running SA directly, some running spamc (altho I recall someo

[SAtalk] Whitelisting Reply-To

I assume this is possible, looking for suggestions on howto. Any pointers to different docs appreciated. The SA docs show us how to whitelist based on "From" and double check on "From_received" http://www.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html Anyone think of a way to whitelist based

[SAtalk] feeding format for sa-learn

Hello, Something that I finally don't really understand. If a message has been recognized as spam, and that it is included as an attachement, do I need to extract the message before giving it to sa-learn (either as spam or ham ?). Another point. We have users here that forward their mail throug

[SAtalk] vmailmgr and SA

I am using vmailmgr and I want to be able to mark spam for all users under vmailmgr, could I just put a procmail receipe in the /home/dom/domain/users directory or is this impossible. -- Jon Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- This SF.net email i

[SAtalk] using shared bayes with spamd

Hi, I'm setting up a sitewide bayes db, and while I realize this isn't optimal, I think it's the easiest compromise in my situation. Now if I do something like sa-learn --ham --mbox some_file under my account, it writes to the bayes db in my ~/.spamassassin directory. How can I get it to write

[SAtalk] Bayesian filter with virtual users / files in MySQL DB?

Hello! I'm using Debian 3.0, postfix 2.0.8, cyrus 2.1.13. The mailusers are all stored in a MySQL database and thus don't exist as system users. Mails are delivered using "deliver" from cyrus. I'd like to use the Bayesian filter. Reading Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf, it seems to me that the only wa

Re: [SAtalk] sharing Bayes DB between relays

On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 09:21:34AM -0400, Adam Denenberg wrote: > I have seen this pop up before but with no real answer. If you have 2 > relay servers with equal MX costs sitting on the perimiter running SA, > how do you have it so they both share and update an "in-sync" db so that > both relay s

Re: [SAtalk] Qmail integration problem.

Hi Derek I also use qmail with SA but without the spamc-client from the qmail-directory. There's a former posting of mine in the mailinglist archive with a link to the instructions I followed to do this, involving renaming the qmail-queue binary. Maybe that's also an option for you? Regards Ralf

Re: [SAtalk] whitelisting not working

ons, 28.05.2003 kl. 06.00 skrev SA: > Hi. I'm running RH Linux with Postfix 1.1.11 , amavisd and SA. SA does > not run as a daemon, it is called up by amavis as a perl module. There > are no local users on this server. All is working pretty good, however > I am having issues with some legit em

RE: [SAtalk] I hate SpamAssassin

tir, 27.05.2003 kl. 23.49 skrev Ben M. VanWagner: > What amazes me is that everytime some idiot does this.. everyone agrees that the > information in the email needs to be changed and then it never is. > > I have mostly been a spectator on this list for the past 6 to 8 months. I have seen > t

Re: [SAtalk] Some observations on doing more with less

A few ideas, below... >- Original Message - >From: "Gary Funck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Spamassassin List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 10:15 PM >Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Some observations on doing more with less > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Steve Sch

[SAtalk] RE: "From" header being rewritten

> So when you disable spamassassin, the headers are written > correctly? === Apparently not. This is what I'm seeing now -- it is the first line that is important/different (arrows added are mine) > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 27 17:28:06 2003 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED