At 01:13 PM 11.9.2003 +0100, Brian Ipsen wrote:
Hi!
Consider the following headers:
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 323 invoked by uid 615); 9 Nov 2003 00:28:19 -
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by worf.andebakken.dk by uid 81 with
Brian Ipsen wrote:
Consider the following headers:
Received: from adsl-66-159-202-147.dslextreme.com (HELO andebakken.dk)
(66.159.202.147)
From: michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The spammer uses my own email address as sender to try to inject spam into
my system
For a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Ipsen writes:
The spammer uses my own email address as sender to try to inject spam into
my system - in combination with TMDA this just causes the confirmation
request be bounced/ /dev/null'ed - and I won't the the message anyway...
Is
On 31 Oct 2003, at 14:54, Patrick von der Hagen wrote:
If your users use IMAP it might be easier to have them copy their
mails to a special folder (either a private one or a shared one) and
have spamassassin regularly learn all mails in this folder(s).
I'm interested in this approach. What is
For the postfix user who is getting a lot of spam to them from spoofed
them, here is a nice quick howto for configuring postfix to prevent
that and to reject those messages at the MTA level.
http://jimsun.LinxNet.com/misc/postfix-anti-UCE.txt
Rejecting messages from me to me was significant at
I have a very good working razor/spam assassin or 4 to be exact. i want to
make a mailbox which i can simply forward spam to from any mail client and
it will report to razor automatically.
1. i'll be calling it something very hard to guess for spammers to send to.
ie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2. i
On 07 Nov 2003, at 08:29, Maarten J H van den Berg wrote:
Just being curious at how this system came about...
As I understand it by feeding millions of spam and ham messages to the
filters and seeing what sticks.
Now, for your purposes, subjects with [word blacklisted by stupid list
server]
Folks --
Recently, there's been some work on getting a rudimentary web of trust
up and running for antispam -- fundamentally, for whitelisting mail
servers.
More details at:
http://www.web-o-trust.org/
--j.
---
This SF.Net email sponsored
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lukreme writes:
Now, for your purposes, subjects with [word blacklisted by stupid list
server] might be exclusively spam. They might not be exclusively spam
for others. That's why you can override any score in your own cf file.
If you want to
On 08 Nov 2003, at 22:34, Dan Kohn wrote:
I recommend allowing
mistake-based training of the small number of false negatives (I use
procmail for this as described at
http://www.dankohn.com/archives/000323.htm).
that link does not load.
--
Athene we all have our moments when we lose it
Slyspy the
--On Sunday, November 09, 2003 6:23 PM -0800 Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Recently, there's been some work on getting a rudimentary web of trust
up and running for antispam -- fundamentally, for whitelisting mail
servers.
More details at:
http://www.web-o-trust.org/
Sounds
This seems to be the new favorite porn euphemism of spammers. (Often with a
dot or other punctuation in the middle.) What's needed to get SA to start
recognizing it as a synonym for cum?
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
On 08 Nov 2003, at 06:46, Terry Milnes wrote:
Some of us though are system administrators and need a solution to
offer to the end users. The typical end user wants to open their
email and see no spam, period.
Since the definition of spam varies from person to person that is
simply not possible
Sorry about that. Try adding an l:
http://www.dankohn.com/archives/000323.html
- dan
--
Dan Kohn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dankohn.com/ tel:+1-650-327-2600
-Original Message-
From: Lukreme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 19:04
To: [EMAIL
I have Spamassassin running with
qmail+vpopmail. I am having troubles getting spamd to tag the subject of a
spam email. Here is the output of maillog:
Nov 9 00:22:43 mail spamd[85995]: identified
spam (12.5/5.5) for qmailq:85 in 1.6 seconds, 2881 bytes.Nov 9
00:22:43 mail
15 matches
Mail list logo
