What is the difference between .spamassassin's user_prefs:
# How many hits before a mail is considered spam.
# required_hits 5
And amavisd-new's
# default values, can be overridden by more specific lookups, e.g. SQL
#$sa_tag_level_deflt = 0; # add spam info headers if at, or above that
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Simon Byrnand
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 4:29 AM
To: Matt Chapman; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] What level to delete at?
I'd say most people probably don't delete automatically
Yes I have dB_file installed (version 1.806).
My amavisd-new is running under amavis.
my $MYHOME var is set to its default (/var/amavis).
These are what are under /var/amavis/.spamassassin/
-rw--- 1 amavis amavis 86016 Nov 25 15:15 bayes_seen
-rw--- 1 amavis amavis
What happened to this mail?
Content analysis details: (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
-- --
0.3 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name
How come it was blocked with
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 22:07:56 -0500, Greg Cirino - Cirelle Enterprises [EMAIL
PROTECTED] writes:
Scott wrote:
| Having a single spam folder is a very bad decision
| I never delete automatically, but the high catagory gets a 10 second
| glance every week, medium gets 20 seconds every week,
On November 25, 2003 03:35 am, Scott A Crosby wrote:
[snip]
If its a webmail application, perhaps you should offer an option with
a very low threshold (I go as low as 2), but sort all of the
'quarantined' emails by SA score, showing lowest first. When you run
low on space, you don't delete the
Hi all:
I have some errors in my log file:
Failed to run NO_DNS_FOR_FROM SpamAssassin
test, skipping: ^I(Undefined subroutine Net::DNS::mx called at
/usr/lib/perl5
/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/EvalTests.pm line 108, GEN717 line
44. )
Nov 25 12:06:13 afrodita spamd[28704]: clean message
what is the setup that allows the users to check the queue for there
mail and then send it on...?
-matt chapman
On Nov 24, 2003, at 9:37 PM, Richard Bewley wrote:
Hello,
We get approximately 1 gig of mail per day, and our system catches
(yesterday at least) 41,185 spam messages per day. This
Do you have spamassassin running as root? If not, log on as the user that
spamassassin runs as, and try the test again.
Original Message-
From: Fritz Mesedilla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes I have dB_file installed (version 1.806).
My amavisd-new is running under amavis.
my $MYHOME var
At 06:13 AM 11/25/2003 +0100, Mark wrote:
Is SA hard to install? Not harder than any other program based on Perl. Perl
is the underlying engine, which, in and by itself, has nothing to do with
SA. It is good to keep that in mind;
Perhaps this is *my* problem. November 14 I mentioned having
Frederick M Avolio wrote:
At 06:13 AM 11/25/2003 +0100, Mark wrote:
Is SA hard to install? Not harder than any other program based on
Perl. Perl
is the underlying engine, which, in and by itself, has nothing to do with
SA. It is good to keep that in mind;
Perhaps this is *my* problem. November
wierd.. i dont seen any headers being preserved. This is the very top
of one of my rewritten spam emails.
Received: from localhost [127.0.0.1] by nymx1.domain.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=--=_3FC2CB65.290EBCFE
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Hi there,
I am using Exchange 2000 as an email server and i
am having troubles with spam emails. I am thinking to put a spam filter for
Exchange 2000.
I was thinking on using Spam Assasin on a Linux box
(or maybe windows machine). But i was just wondering if anybody has tried
Spamassasin
http://slashdot.org/articles/03/11/25/1314226.shtml?tid=126tid=163
--
Michael H. Collins Admiral, Penguinista Navy
It's us against them. Ride like you stole it!
http://linuxlink.com
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback
Well, it's something that I wrote, but basically, I'm using Postfix and
Spamassassin. Spamassassin tags messages as [SPAM]. In a Postfix
header_check, anything that is tagged by SpamAssassin gets status HOLD.
Whatever isn't held is passed to IMail. Those that are held are put in
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
gentian
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 8:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] spamassassin and Exchange 2000
Hi there,
At 04:24 PM 11/25/03 +0800, Fritz Mesedilla wrote:
What happened to this mail?
Content analysis details: (0.3 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
-- --
0.3 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not
Good morning,
I've been running Spamassassin since 2.43 and we are quite happy with it.
I just finished an upgrade from 2.55 to 2.60 and seemed to go well. I
upgraded two servers, boith configured identically, with same software,OS,
etc installed.
SPARC 20, Solaris 2.6
Spamassassin 2.60
qmail
I do
just that (with Exchange 5.5) and it works great.
I went
with Redhat 9, Postfix and Spamassassin, mostly as per this little guide - http://postfix.cnc.bc.ca/twiki/bin/view/Main/SpamAssassinTaggingOnly
regards,Paul--Paul HutchingsNetwork
Administrator, MIRA Ltd.Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378,
Hi all
The InfoWorld article has just hit Slashdot (http://www.slashdot.org/)
Good vehicle to reverse the bad publicity methinks.
Ciao
Zak
--
http://www.carfolio.com/Searchable database of 10 000+ car specs
I was getting this error a while back. I'm sorry that I can't remember what
exactly I did to fix it, could you provide a little more detail? Hopefully
ittl jog my memory.
-Original Message-
From: German Staltari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 9:31 AM
To: [EMAIL
Hi Ian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:spamassassin-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ian douglas
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 8:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] paris hilton
Haven't seen the spam but one of these should work if your
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Matt Kettler wrote:
What are some of the setups out there? What score do you delete at?
On our system (CommunityNet ISP) we allow our inidividual users to set
their 'Hits Required' level, and choose between deleting or merely
flagging the mail. We encounter some confusion
Terry Milnes said:
Frederick M Avolio wrote:
At 06:13 AM 11/25/2003 +0100, Mark wrote:
Is SA hard to install? Not harder than any other program based on
Perl. Perl
is the underlying engine, which, in and by itself, has nothing to
do with
SA. It is good to keep that in mind;
Perhaps
As there are several people who seem to be interested in my queueing system,
I think I'll put something together, but keep in mind it will only work if
you have postfix setup a certain way, so in most setups it isn't really an
option. I would be willing to take on some contract work setting up
Actually, I think I remembered! I think what I did was to run sa-learn
--rebuild *on the correct db directory* I'm pretty sure it has to be a
directory. Anyways, let me know if that works out for you!
=-) Good luck!
-J.C.
-Original Message-
From: German Staltari [mailto:[EMAIL
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 09:47, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:06:28AM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
shouldnt the original from be preserved up top?
If there was a from in the original, it should be in the encapsulated
message. Feel free to open a bugzilla ticket, and attach
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 09:47, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:06:28AM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
shouldnt the original from be preserved up top?
If there was a from in the original, it should be in the encapsulated
message. Feel free to open a bugzilla ticket, and attach
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 10:36:55 -0500, JC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I think I remembered! I think what I did was to run sa-learn
--rebuild *on the correct db directory* I'm pretty sure it has to be a
directory. Anyways, let me know if that works out for you!
Thanks for your help, but It's
Unfortunately, this is not true. Using Amavis from postfix or sendmail as a
content filter results in exactly the same situation. The email is sent
from postfix to amavis exactly once with all of the adresses, not once for
each address. The only way arround this currently (without writing code)
On Tuesday 25 November 2003 05:18 am, Frederick M Avolio wrote:
Yesterday I again tried to install 2.60 on RedHat Linux 7.3.
This is your problem^^
I undersntad that that is the only thing that some corporate types will
support but it is very badly out
I have the following setup
Sendmail 8.12.10
Mimedefang 2.37
Spamassassin 2.55
All running under Solaris 8
How can I get spamassassin to recognise the attached e-mail as spam.
I have looked through the tests on the spamassassin web site, but to no
avail.
Thanks in advance.
Is SA hard to install? Not harder than any other program
based on Perl.
While I agree it is not a good idea to compare SA 2.44 to current commercial
anti-spam packages, I think those of you who say that SA is easy to install
are being a little bit disingenuous.
It has a whole laundry list of
-Original Message-
From: ian douglas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 6:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] paris hilton
Anyone have any good obfuscation rules for p4r1s h1|+0n spam?
I'm getting a
ton of these every day...
-id
I can't
At 05:28 AM 11/25/2003, Jose Luis Garcia wrote:
Failed to run NO_DNS_FOR_FROM SpamAssassin
test, skipping: ^I(Undefined subroutine Net::DNS::mx called at
/usr/lib/perl5
/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/EvalTests.pm line 108, GEN717 line
44. )
Hmm, that almost sounds like your Net::DNS perl
Title: Message
Anyone have a
good rule for catching gappy text like the following message. It seems like with
all the nice rules we have to catch hidden HTML tags, that writing a simple
rules to catch a bunch of underscores or dots shouldn't be so hard... but then,
I still need to study
Wow -- here's a Nigerian type spam that scored 0.00 . I've just submit it to
DCC and leared in my bayes. Posted here if anyone wants to add to rulesets.
-Chris
==
Chris Candreva -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- (914) 967-7816
WestNet Internet
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Matt Chapman wrote:
I have been deleting at a score of 5 via Mimedefang. I notice that
some spam is scoring at 3.5 and 4ish. Is is better to tag at say 3-4.9
and delete if it is any higher?
For my mail, I wouldn't auto-delete anything below 10
At 06:39 AM 11/25/2003 -0800, Brook Humphrey wrote:
On Tuesday 25 November 2003 05:18 am, Frederick M Avolio wrote:
Yesterday I again tried to install 2.60 on RedHat Linux 7.3.
This is your problem^^
I undersntad that that is the only thing that some
I've been using SpamAssassin since about May. Recently I started
getting a lot of false positives with SA 2.60. I noticed that all my mail
was getting a bayesian score of 99 to 100%. I'm not exactly sure why it
was happening. My best guess is that since the bayes database only holds
a limited
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, mairhtin o'feannag wrote:
I have one client who wants to receive any emails they get, irrespective
of SPAM (they suspect that there are legitimate emails being eliminated as
spam). What they want is that anything that is addressed to them
(yadayada.com) be sent through
At 11:06 AM 11/25/2003, McWhirter,Julia wrote:
I have looked through the tests on the spamassassin web site, but to no
avail.
1) that's not a complete email it's only a body with partial headers, thus
nobody will be able to test it against spamassassin.
2) these kind of obfuscating strings are
-Original Message-
From: Brook Humphrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 November, 2003 3:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] An Open Letter to the SA-talk forum
On Tuesday 25 November 2003 05:18 am, Frederick M Avolio wrote:
Yesterday I again tried to install 2.60 on
On Tuesday 25 November 2003 08:37 am, you wrote:
So, SA 2.60 will only run with RH Linux 7.3? I suspect it really is a
problem with the version of Perl I am running. But there is no dependency
for a particular version of Perl listed. (I am running v5.6.1 built for
i386-linux.)
ah no i was
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Scott A Crosby wrote:
How happy are people with the performance of SA, especially with all
of thee new rules? The reason I ask is that I'm on-again, off-again
I think a faster engine is a great idea, no matter what. Spam is growing --
even if our servers are big enough
Same with me at 3 separate locations; one with Exch 5.5 and two with
Exch 2000. It works great!
In my setup, SA has little to do with Exch. It's a separate server which
MX points to and then the Linux box forwards all mail to Exch after
running SA. The users have Outlook Rules to move [SPAM]
Dear
community,
I
send out email news letters each week for my clients but I want to offer them
the ability to see if there emails will be blocked due to there email
containing a large amount of spam scoring text?
Does
anyone out there know of a plug-in for spamassassin or
any other
The thing that struck me, and admittedly this is coming from a Windows
background, is the sheer amount of stuff you can do with an MTA like
Postfix (or, I suspect most *nix MTAs).
Little things like being able to export a list of valid users to avoid all
the dictionary spam, being able to RBL
We were running SA2.6 on Rh7.3 here but only after we updated Perl to 5.6.1
(or was it 5.8 - don't remember offhand). We had no major issues once Perl
was done (couple script changes here and there and changing local.cf around)
- we have since moved to SuSE 9 Pro since RH is dropping 7.3 and 8.0
I am looking to have a spamd config file and been unable to find one. I may
have missed it. Otherwise I will have to have a very long line to configure
spamd the way I want it to run. The reason is because there is over 200 IP
addresses that i want to restrict spamd to listen to. These IP
At 11:49 AM 11/25/2003, Bret Miller wrote:
Anyone have a good rule for catching gappy text like the following
message. It seems like with all the nice rules we have to catch hidden
HTML tags, that writing a simple rules to catch a bunch of underscores or
dots shouldn't be so hard... but then, I
At 03:27 11/25/2003 -0600, Scott A Crosby wrote:
I mentioned this about a year ago, but now that people are starting to
write rulesets with hundreds to thousands of new rules, I thought I'd
bring it up again.
How happy are people with the performance of SA, especially with all
of thee new rules?
If you have access to a spamassassin binary, you can do the same thing
on any system (i.e. install SA on your system and run the message
through).
Another simple way to do it would be to simply send the mail to yourself
(assuming you have SA on a server somewhere filtering your emails) and
--On Tuesday, November 25, 2003 5:12 PM + Nick Tong
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear community,
I send out email news letters each week for my clients but I want to
offer them the ability to see if there emails will be blocked due to
there email containing a large amount of spam
If so is this possible on a windows platform?
Nick Tong
-Original
Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Tong
Sent: 25
November 2003 17:12
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] SpamScore check
Dear community,
I send
Brook Humphrey wrote:
On Tuesday 25 November 2003 05:18 am, Frederick M Avolio wrote:
Yesterday I again tried to install 2.60 on RedHat Linux 7.3.
*This* is your problem ^^
How so? (My emphasis added)
I have a number of RedHat 7.3 servers which have
Logan Harbaugh wrote:
To all concerned, I apologize for the apparent maligning of SpamAssassin
in my recent article in InfoWorld. In my original article, I stated that
I used the 2.44 release of SpamAssassin for two reasons - because it was
the version shipping with the latest release of Red
SA 2.55 on RH 6.2 running as spamd with Qmail.
Just installed Razor 2.36.
SA faq says to confirm that Razor is running by using debug mode and observing that razor is available and what version, etc,.
I see:
Razor2 is available
Using results from Razor v2.36
However, I never
I have been seeing lots of spam like this getting through
recently
Anyone have any ideas how to reduce this type of spam from
getting through?
Thanks,
Tony B, CCNA, Network+
Systems Administration
GO Concepts, Inc. / www.go-concepts.com
Are you on the GO yet?
What about those
I am currently trying to implement bayes on my SA system. I was using spamcop before
and I started using a spamcop reporting
plug-in for my sa-learn reporting. I could configure the plug-in to redirect my spam,
headers and all to the learning account of my
choosing.
I have just realized that
Frederick M Avolio wrote:
Perhaps this is *my* problem. November 14 I mentioned having problems
upgrading to 2.60. One of the rules was giving an error.
A custom rule, or a builtin rule? I've been running 2.60 on my own 7.3
server for around two months; and I just upgraded the production
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 01:22:51PM -0500, Tony Bunce is rumored to have said:
I have been seeing lots of spam like this getting through recently
Anyone have any ideas how to reduce this type of spam from getting
through?
I noticed that this guy's using our domain name as the argument to
On Tuesday 25 November 2003 10:22 am, Kris Deugau wrote:
--snip--
didn't read most of above
Because it's been around for a while and has been proven to be decently
stable as a production server platform maybe?
no because redhat changed thier policies and none of the big oems support any
of
We just rolled out SpamAssassin 2.60 as a spam filtering option to our
users (after using it on IT staff guinea pigs for about a month), and only
have about 20 people using it so far out of a possible 800 or so. In theory,
the mail server (dual 1.13 PIIIs, 1Gb RAM, FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE) should be
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Ron Weales wrote:
However, I never saw anything about read server list, closest server
is or connecting to...
So it appears that Razor isn't connecting to their servers.
It just so happened --- I'm working right now on why it seems razor stopped
working here. It looks
At 12:12 PM 11/25/2003, Nick Tong wrote:
I send out email news letters each week for my clients but I want to offer
them the ability to see if there emails will be blocked due to there email
containing a large amount of spam scoring text?
Does anyone out there know of a plug-in for spamassassin
-Original Message-
From: Christopher X. Candreva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 11:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Nigerian-type scores 0.00
Wow -- here's a Nigerian type spam that scored 0.00 . I've
just submit it to
DCC and
At 12:37 PM 11/25/2003, Douglas Kirkland wrote:
I am looking to have a spamd config file and been unable to find one. I may
have missed it. Otherwise I will have to have a very long line to configure
spamd the way I want it to run. The reason is because there is over 200 IP
addresses that i
One big problem you have is this
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=ham
That autolearned it as ham, so now all other emails that come through
with will be seen as hammy. If you use the additional rules on Chris'
site at
On Tuesday 25 November 2003 10:55, Matt Kettler wrote:
At 12:37 PM 11/25/2003, Douglas Kirkland wrote:
I am looking to have a spamd config file and been unable to find one. I
may
have missed it. Otherwise I will have to have a very long line to
configure
spamd the way I want it to run.
On Monday, November 24, 2003 4:24 PM -0800 Logan Harbaugh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The point of using the old version of SpamAssassin was to show how
much the technology has changed in the last few years. That was
stated in my original article but edited out of the final version.
(I love copy
At 02:17 PM 11/25/2003, Douglas Kirkland wrote:
I am using the '-A' to tell which IP addresses to listen to.
-m max-children
-V virtual-config directory
-p port
ahh, I was confused by your abuse of the word listen...
-A doesn't change the behavior of calls to listen()..
Well it may not be that
Chris' EVILRULES gets the score up by 3 on that. See
http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm. Also,
Colin A. Bartlett had posted a spam sentences rule set that adds an
additional 2 points to that email. His original score I think was 10
for each sentence, but I decreased
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Ron Weales wrote:
I know Razor is running with SA, but how can I find out if Razor is using
their distributed, collaborative, spam detection and filtering network?
I should see something in the debugged log file about connections to
servers, correct?
spamassassin -D
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 14:07:50 -0500, JC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What makes you say that? Could you post whatever details lead you to that
conclusion?
If I force an expire (sa-learn --force-expire) or force a sync (sa-learn
--rebuild), no errors are reported, so It happens when an opporunistic
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 13:11:10 -0500, Roger Merchberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 03:27 11/25/2003 -0600, Scott A Crosby wrote:
An automata based regexp engine is one that can compile a set of
regular expressionns down into an automata, then run the automata. The
advantage this has is that
What makes you say that? Could you post whatever details lead you to that
conclusion?
-Original Message-
From: German Staltari [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 10:36:55 -0500, JC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, I think I remembered! I think what I did was to run
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 04:43:35PM +0200, Zak McGregor wrote:
Hi all
The InfoWorld article has just hit Slashdot (http://www.slashdot.org/)
It took 'em long enough.
--
-
Dan Wilder [EMAIL PROTECTED] Technical Manager
SSC,
Hello,
sa-learn stopped learning messages. Debugging shows that it can
successfully tie Bayes db, extracts tokens, etc, but never actually
writes data to the database.
I had a db corruption issue some time ago, so, this could very
well be remnants of that.
Anyway, I'm trying to run sa-learn
I was running a whitelist on our local domain for a long time but overcoming
whitelisted spam became too much of a chore. So I removed the whitelist
entry and replaced with a header check on Received to verify it came from
our internal machines, then assigned it -50. Then I slap a 5.1 on
-Original Message-
From: Chris Thielen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 6:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Evil rules, popcorn, etc too much?
Chris Santerre said:
The FP rate for all of these is just about zero. I
recommend popcorn,
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Mike Kuentz (2) wrote:
One big problem you have is this
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=ham
Oh yeah -- already re-learned as spam.
with will be seen as hammy. If you use the additional rules on Chris'
site at
At 01:43 PM 11/25/2003, Dan Tappin wrote:
When I run sa-learn I only see the '1 message learned' output even thought
I forwarded multiple messages to that mailbox.
Any ideas / comments?
sa-learn --mbox
unless you add the --mbox parameter, sa-learn expects a single rfc822
format message per
A custom rule, or a builtin rule?
built-in.
I looked back through one of the archives (the other seemed to be a
little broken), but didn't see any messages from you around Nov 14.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-talkm=106883816809749w=2
The error was:
Nov 14 11:02:12 lh
We tag it as spam at 6.0 and delete it after 5 days. Since we get over
200MB of spam a day (for less than 1300 email accounts), keeping it
indefinitely is not an option. The user has 5 days to check the Spam
folder in their web email to catch any FPs. If they like we can bypass
the filtering
My .razor/servers.discovery.lst has 66.151.150.11.
I know Razor is running with SA, but how can I find out if Razor is using their distributed, collaborative, spam detection and filtering network? I should see something in the debugged log file about connections to servers, correct?
-Original Message-
From: Chris Barnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 2:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Re: RE: Re[2]:
http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/11/14/45FEspam_1.html?s=tc
On Monday, November 24, 2003 4:24 PM -0800 Logan
We just replaced our old qmail-scanner + spamd system with a fresh install,
and we had a concurrency incoming of about 150. The old single processor
PIII 800 handled this just fine.
The new dual PIII 1Ghz would supposedly work much better. With
qmail-scanner 1.20 and spamd 2.60 it managed to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Bongert writes:
We just rolled out SpamAssassin 2.60 as a spam filtering option to our
users (after using it on IT staff guinea pigs for about a month), and only
have about 20 people using it so far out of a possible 800 or so. In theory,
the
If you have been in a cave, easynet is shutting down. They have on their web
page the following:
easynet.nl Spamlist - DISCONTINUED DEC 1 2003
easynet.nl Dynablock dial-up database - dynablock.easynet.nl - DISCONTINUED
DEC 1 2003
Suggestion for replacement: dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net
easynet.nl
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Frederick M Avolio wrote:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-talkm=106883816809749w=2
The error was:
Nov 14 11:02:12 lh spamd[17078]: Use of uninitialized value in open at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/TextCat.pm line 63.
This may mean
-Original Message-
From: Larry Gilson
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 3:30 PM
To: 'Tony Bunce'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Ideas
Attached is a custom rule file. It has been working rather well and I will
be increasing the score from 0.5 to 1.0. The cf file also has
We just replaced our old qmail-scanner + spamd system with a fresh
install,
and we had a concurrency incoming of about 150. The old single processor
PIII 800 handled this just fine.
The new dual PIII 1Ghz would supposedly work much better. With
qmail-scanner 1.20 and spamd 2.60 it managed
I am unclear as to how to feed mail that is spam and gets by the filters
back into sa so that it can learn them. can someone walk me how to do this,
especially if the mail to be marked as spam is on a windows box now and not
the linux box (I use doze for my mail client, and linux for serving...
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
My question is, What are the views of sorbs.net? Is it effective? FPs are my
worst nightmare. IF it blocks open proxies, (like Korea!) I'm screwed. Any
comments are welcome. I just realised with the holidays that I have to fix
this soon :)
I just
At 03:27 11/25/2003 -0600, Scott A Crosby wrote:
... except one caveat: What was the memory utilization like? That's *my*
big problem with SA - I had to bump the RAM in my mailserver twice (256M
-
512M - 1G) for SA alone, and it's still shakey to the point I cannot
deploy it sitewide... :-/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony
Bunce
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 1:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Ideas
I have been seeing lots of spam like this getting through recently
Anyone have any ideas how to reduce
Check out the documentation at the razor site. As a result of reading these docs I'm running a small cron script daily:
razor discover:
#! /bin/bash
# refresh /root/.razor/
razor-admin -discover
Viola - no razor problems.
Steve Swaney
s[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 13:58:53
Rumor has it that Scott A Crosby may have mentioned these words:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 13:11:10 -0500, Roger Merchberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
The response was that at a half-second a message is enough.
You prolly didn't get many qmailers to respond, then... If it wasn't for SA
spam, my
On Tuesday 25 November 2003 14:31, Matt Kettler wrote:
At 01:43 PM 11/25/2003, Dan Tappin wrote:
When I run sa-learn I only see the '1 message learned' output even thought
I forwarded multiple messages to that mailbox.
Any ideas / comments?
sa-learn --mbox
unless you add the --mbox
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
