On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 09:21:11PM +0100, Erwan Le Moing wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 02:08 PM 11/28/2003, Erwan Le Moing wrote:
I've just configured Spamassassin on my postfix system and add
autolearn :
an address [EMAIL PROTECTED] where i send spam who pass through
spamassassin
an
Hi all,
Can anyone else confirm that spamassassin -r fails to remove SA markup when
it invokes bayes learning?
Thanks,
Pedro
--
Penguin Trivia #46:
Animals who are not penguins can only wish they were.
-- Chicago Reader 10/15/82
However. I am not getting enough of it. I was thinking of dropping my
hit
number to 4 and see if that does anything. What do you guys set your
hits
to?
I tag at 4 for my home setup, but I would hesitate to go that low on a
site-wide basis -- I use 6. Are you running network tests? SA will
I want to backup my incoming mail before sending it
to spamassasin. I have made the following .procmailrc.
:0 c:
backup
:0fw: spamassassin.lock
* 256000
| spamassassin
Can someone tell if this is fine.
Looks good. See 'man procmailex' for this and other examples.
...guenther
The weirdest thing. To my great scare I found myself suddenly blacklisted at
relays.osirusoft.com:
nslookup 70.160.109.194.relays.osirusoft.com
Server: localhost
Address: 127.0.0.1
Non-authoritative answer:
Name:70.160.109.194.relays.osirusoft.com
Address: 127.0.0.2
WTF?? So, I ran over
I am having a tough time trying to build spamassassin
on a RH 9.0 with perl 5.8.0 installation
eveytime I try and build it the makefile that
is created from both CPAN and from source both
give me the same failures.
Makefile written by ExtUtils::MakeMaker 6.03
Makefile:94: *** missing
On November 29, 2003 11:11 am, Mark wrote:
I've read that Osirusoft is not longer operational:
http://slashdot.org/articles/03/08/27/0214238.shtml?tid=111tid=126
--
Unnamed Law:
If it happens, it must be possible.
---
This SF.net
Hello!
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Mark wrote:
The weirdest thing. To my great scare I found myself suddenly blacklisted at
relays.osirusoft.com:
As I understand it, 'osirusoft' went offline in August, and as a form of
'notice' to all their previous clients, set their blacklist DNS lookup to
return
At 04:11 PM 11/29/03 +, Mark wrote:
The weirdest thing. To my great scare I found myself suddenly blacklisted at
relays.osirusoft.com:
nslookup 70.160.109.194.relays.osirusoft.com
Server: localhost
Address: 127.0.0.1
Non-authoritative answer:
Name:70.160.109.194.relays.osirusoft.com
Hello,
I am having a devil of a time trying to find out how to add to the procmail.log.
What I want is to have the To: listed in the log, along with the From and Subject.
Currently, the From:, Subject:, and the
destination folder are shown as below :
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 29
- Original Message -
From: Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 7:01 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Cache poisoning on relays.osirusoft.com??
WTF?? So, I ran over to another shell server, and did the same. And, lo
At Sat Nov 29 18:17:38 2003, mairhtin wrote:
Hello,
I am having a devil of a time trying to find out how to add to the
procmail.log.
What I want is to have the To: listed in the log, along with the
From and Subject. Currently, the From:, Subject:, and the
destination folder are shown
Title: To bounce or not to bounce
Hi
I followed the guidelines of scott l henderson on how to build a RH9 system with postfix, amavis and spamassassin. All works fine now, but I'm wondering about one thing. He makes a setting ($warnspamsender = 1) that will sent the original sender an
Using Debian Sarge with spamassassin-2.60-2 deb package and
procmail-3.22-7.
Even when it used to work, since a few weeks it seems like spamassassin
doesn't follow my local.cf rules. For example, even when I have:
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or even
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
my
At 09:29 PM 11/29/03 +0100, Gabrie van Zanten wrote:
Hi
I followed the guidelines of scott l henderson on how to
build a RH9 system with postfix, amavis and spamassassin. All works fine
now, but I'm wondering about one thing. He makes a setting
($warnspamsender = 1) that will sent the original
Dr Aldo Medina said:
Using Debian Sarge with spamassassin-2.60-2 deb package and
procmail-3.22-7.
Even when it used to work, since a few weeks it seems like spamassassin
doesn't follow my local.cf rules. For example, even when I have:
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or even
The attached email looks like a legitimate bounce, but I'm not sure whether
it is just a spam message masquerading as a bounce. How can one tell which
is correct?
From root Sat Nov 29 07:30:07 2003
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from typhoon.skynet.be (typhoon.skynet.be
Bayes is working very well for me, but I am concerned about poisoning the
database with extraneous, obfuscating words that many spam messages contain.
A few postings to this list say that there is no problem, but I don't want
to spoil a good thing. Are there some rules of thumb on what to
People can be blunt on Usenet. But procmail is not sendmail, so it's
hardly surprising they suggested you go elsewhere. The same would
happen here if you started posting questions about some other
anti-spam software (except we might be more polite than if this were
usenet :-)
Very nicely
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 19:54:13 + (GMT), Martin Radford wrote:
According to the procmailrc man page, you can log anything you want to
the procmail log file by assigning it to the LOG variable.
You should be able to use the formail command to extract the To:
header.
So, it *looks* like you
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, mairhtin wrote:
procmail: Extraneous locallockfile ignored
That's coming from this line:
:0:
The trailing colon means to use a lockfile, but your action (i.e., nested
recipes enclosed in braces) doesn't provide procmail with a filename that
it can use as the basis for a
Can anyone please tell me generally how frenquently they're DCC is
hitting with SA?
I installed for single user client yesterday, and aside from a run with
the sample-spam.txt file, I've seen no dcc check hits in caught spam SA
markup (out of my usual 300 or so spam/24 hours).
The dcc install
1. There is a procmail mailing list, where questions like this are
discussed. Warning: although not as cranky as the sendmail list,
this group will encourage you to RTFM before posting your question.
see http://mailman.rwth-aachen.de/mailman/listinfo/procmail for
details.
2. Given
On Saturday 29 November 2003 18:53, Bryan Hoover wrote:
Can anyone please tell me generally how frenquently they're DCC is
hitting with SA?
I installed for single user client yesterday, and aside from a run with
the sample-spam.txt file, I've seen no dcc check hits in caught spam SA
markup
Clive Dove wrote:
On Saturday 29 November 2003 18:53, Bryan Hoover wrote:
I noticed the same thing. I have come to the conclusion that DCC and RBL
checking are not working in Spamassassin 2.60 and I wondered if there was
something additional tha had to be done.
Mm. I've seen no problems
Title: RE: [SAtalk] Re: An Open Letter to the SA-talk forum
Ken,
I think that the reason you can't imagine it taking longer than five minutes to install is that you've done it a few times. I'm a reviewer, not a full-time Linux administrator, and don't have enough time to keep up with all
Hey Everyone,
I'm having a problem trying to install spamassassin locally (my provider's
box crashed, and the new one doesn't have it installed site-wide):
I run:
perl Makefile.PL PREFIX=~/sausr SYSCONFDIR=~/saetc
and then
make ; make install
This is the error I get:
mkdir
* * * * EMAIL QUARANTINE NOTIFICATION * * * *
Physical Plant Services has identified certain file types and message content as
having the potential to propagate viruses. In order to provide a more secure
computing environment, these emails are being quarantined and manually
scanned for
I'm running spamassassin 2.60 on mandrake 9.2 using kmail. Just recently I
collected 200 spam and ham mails and after looking to check if the bayes
filter started working I found that it only seems to work if I use the
command 'spamassassin' not 'spamc' to pipe the messages through. While
The spamassassin score are optimized, I guess, for a use with the default
options. This implie the use of all the network-checks, which are not
possible for everyone. I guess the results of the optimization will be quite
different without razor, pyzor, and the RBL checks. It could be nice to
Thanks for your attention, but what I'm looking is Server side solution.
You might want to have a look at MDaemon from www.altn.com
Uses SA. At present they are still on version 2.55, but are working on
implementing 2.60.
---
This SF.net
Hi Matt,
I set up this new box with the intention for it to act as a gateway. Essentially,
this box should handle all incoming mail for my domain, filter SPAM, then forward all
non-filtered mail to mail server #2. Mail server # 2 handles all mail delivery for
user accounts etc. Getting this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 01:21 pm, Nathan Triplett wrote:
I'm running spamassassin 2.60 on mandrake 9.2 using kmail. Just recently I
collected 200 spam and ham mails and after looking to check if the bayes
filter started working I found that
Clive Dove wrote:
I have observed that both Pyzor and Razor are working as they show up in
the caught spam, but there is no sign that any of the other database checks
are being run.
How do I enable these features? Are their applications that have to be
installed?
There's a
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Bryan Hoover wrote:
Can anyone please tell me generally how frenquently they're DCC is
hitting with SA?
Well I just cleaned out my probably-spam folder a few minutes ago, but out
of 23 in there now, 13 hit DCC_CHECK
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Gorm,
Saturday, November 29, 2003, 1:52:13 PM, you wrote:
GJ Bayes is working very well for me, but I am concerned about poisoning
GJ the database with extraneous, obfuscating words that many spam
GJ messages contain.
I used to be concerned
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Didier,
Friday, November 28, 2003, 6:08:03 AM, you wrote:
DH The spamassassin score are optimized, I guess, for a use with the
DH default options.
Actually, the SpamAssassin scores are optimized four different ways.
Each rule has four scores,
37 matches
Mail list logo
