Any idea how a message with so many hits got such a low score?
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on anubis
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,BIZ_TLD,CLICK_BELOW,
*sigh*
HABEAS_SWE
Do people read this list or just post questions? Sorry, not meant to lash
out, but this Habeas topic has been all the rage today. Don't know how
anyone could miss it.
Wow, way to be rude about it.
There might exist the possibility that not every subscriber of this list
Just wanted to let everyone know, my bayes journal sync problems went away
with SA 2.61
I'm using bayes_learn_to_journal 1 and bayes_journal_max_size 0, then
running an sa-learn --rebuild twice a day. That seems to be working very
well for me.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 02:12:31PM -0800, Chip
And again this morning:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] chip]$ ls -la .spamassassin/
total 30048
drwx--3 chip chip 4096 Nov 26 09:33 .
drwxr-xr-x 13 chip chip 4096 Nov 26 09:44 ..
-rw---1 chip chip 13 Nov 26 09:33 bayes.lock
-rw---1 chip chip
If I recall the annoucement details correctly, the IP is still going to
resolve for a little while (few months?), but will not return any results.
Unlike Osirusoft's wildcard positive behavior, I don't see Dynablock's
shutdown having any immediate negative consquences.
Am I mistaken?
On Wed,
Can someone explain to me what this debug log entry means:
debug: bayes: something fishy, calculating atime (first pass)
I get it every time I run sa-learn --force-expire
Is that normal?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net
I've had this problem randomly. Bayes tends to lock itself for some sort
of DB operation, dies midway, and then dosen't clear the lock. I've
disabled my bayes in the meantime until I move over to spamd or amavisd-new.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 06:33:25AM -0500, MIKE YRABEDRA wrote:
I had
So amavisd-new does use bayes, you just need to set the perms right?
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 05:22:09PM +, Casper Gasper wrote:
debug: bayes: no dbs present, cannot scan:
/root/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
Have you got the DB_File module installed? You need it for bayes. I
take it
I have bayes_auto_learn turned off in .spamassassin/user_prefs:
bayes_auto_learn 0
So how come when I get this spam:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 24 21:25:58 2003
Subject: hi
Folder: /home/chip/mail/spam/spam.to-be-archived 5578
I see bayes_journal getting some action:
[EMAIL
I'm still having this locking problem, so I've disabled bayes.
I'll look to either moving to spamd/spamc or amavisd-new over the next
couple of weeks to see if that resolves my lock contention problems.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 03:51:49PM -0800, Chip Paswater wrote:
I'm having some trouble
This problem has caused me to stop using Spamassassin to do individual
reporting, and instead strip the emails and use razor itself to send spam
in batches. I've found this to decrease the errors substantially.
Additionally, now that I send in batches every 5 minutes, if razor refuses
the
Razor does a lookup to the Razor server every time. Nothing is cached.
I assume the same for DCC
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 03:48:51PM +1100, Zlatko Hristov wrote:
Hello,
Does Razor and DCC do a direct lookup to same database on the internet
every time SA scans a message? Or its storing
I'm having some trouble with Bayes. Occasionally, mail will stop flowing
in my system. This is because my procmail spamassassin.lock file becomes
stale. I've futher discovered that it's because the bayes DB gets locked
and somehow dies midway during a rebuild. This causes my whole mail system
I'm having some trouble with Bayes. Occasionally, mail will stop flowing
in my system. This is because my procmail spamassassin.lock file becomes
stale. I've futher discovered that it's because the bayes DB gets locked
and somehow dies midway during a rebuild. This causes my whole mail
Does anyone else have trouble with procmail not cleaning up
spamassassin.lock when it's done?
I see a series of these in the procmail log:
procmail: Locking spamassassin.lock
procmail: [2425] Mon Nov 17 14:06:56 2003
procmail: Locking spamassassin.lock
procmail: [2425] Mon Nov 17 14:07:04 2003
Have you gotten razor working by itself?
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 05:20:44PM -0500, MIKE YRABEDRA wrote:
on 11/13/03 4:49 PM, David B Funk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Other thing to try, run spamd with the '-D' flag to turn on
debugging output. (But don't run it that way for too long unless
Also, check vmstat or top instead of relying on your system load average.
The load average is not necessarily indicitave of your actual system load.
If you find it taking too many resources, try bumping it's nice level way
down when you run it.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 11:30:21PM +0100,
If you use Windows and Outlook, try Cloudmark's Spamnet product. It's
the commercial version of razor, and feeds the same backend database.
I think it's still free to use. http://www.cloudmark.com
As far as looking up status, there's no official way to do it. You could
create a unique
Guys,
Awesome product!
I've been hiding my email address for years. Also, years ago I turned off
my webmaster@ hostmaster@ and other email addresses because the spam level
was getting insane. Not to mention my global @chipware.net which would
catch everything else.
Now with spamassassin, all
Hey Guys,
I apologize if these questions are asked somewhere, but I did browse the
FAQ and documentation and didn't see an answer.
I have a good understanding of Razor v2, but I just started using SA.
1. When reporting spam via spamassassin -r, can I supply an mbox instead
of a single
20 matches
Mail list logo
