RE: [SAtalk] thank you guys: DEBUG attached

2004-01-28 Thread Gary Smith
I don't see much of a problem. logmsg: clean message (-4.9/4.0) for xadmin:500 in 3.6 seconds, 521 bytes. Is the key line. This isn't too unreasonable. What does sar say. One of my incoming mail spoolers (which receives a fairly light load) says: 12:40:00 PM all 2.21 0.01 0

RE: [SAtalk] the list itself???

2004-01-27 Thread Gary Smith
Again, it's been slow all weekend (only a couple posts). Since my last post never made it I assume that it's SF. This was send at 23:22 PST on Sunday. I guess I'll wait to see how long this thing takes before it hit's the list. Gary -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[

RE: [SAtalk] Blank mails with attachments make it through

2004-01-27 Thread Gary Smith
ut I don't know what they are. Gary Smith -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Van Gordon Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2004 12:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sourceforge. Net (E-mail) Subject: [SAtalk] Blank mails with attachm

[SAtalk] SF Slow, possible same problems as me...

2004-01-27 Thread Gary Smith
Not sure if this is why SF is slow but today I have been averaging 20 viruses a minute... Seems to be slowing now as it's getting later in the evening (10:12pm PST). God it's been a painful afternoon. I can delete the administrator notifications fast enough.

RE: [SAtalk] the list itself???

2004-01-26 Thread Gary Smith
ED] On Behalf Of Gary Smith Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 11:21 PM To: Tim B; Spamassassin List Subject: RE: [SAtalk] the list itself??? Slow all weekend. Only like 3 posts... Gary -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim B Sent: Sunday, Janu

RE: [SAtalk] the list itself???

2004-01-26 Thread Gary Smith
Slow all weekend. Only like 3 posts... Gary -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim B Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 8:44 PM To: Spamassassin List Subject: [SAtalk] the list itself??? did I get booted off the list, no list traffic or is sour

RE: [SAtalk] Automated ruleset download

2004-01-20 Thread Gary Smith
Yes, check the archives for an email from me (bigevil update) or Chris Peterson (all updates -ge, cp, weeds, etc). These were topics last week and last month -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of JRiley Sent: Tue 1/20/2004 10:52 AM To

[SAtalk] An automated way to keep upwith the latest rulesets

2004-01-20 Thread Gary Smith
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Chris Petersen Sent: Sat 1/17/2004 9:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Ann: "Rules De Jour": An automated way to keep upwith the latest rulesets

RE: [SAtalk] BigEvil Archive

2004-01-19 Thread Gary Smith
ou mileage might vary. Gary Smith -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carl Chipman Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 11:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] BigEvil Archive Does anyone have an older copy of BigEvil.cf? I downloaded toda

RE: [SAtalk] unfakeable Habeas watermark?

2004-01-14 Thread Gary Smith
it's is easy but it is doable. But then again, like every organization, politics usually play too much of a role to accomplish what was proposed anyways. Gary Smith -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Kettler Sent: Wednesday,

RE: [SAtalk] [MAILER-DAEMON@chips.sthomas.net: Returned mail: seetranscript for details]

2004-01-13 Thread Gary Smith
this problem he should use relay all of his email to the ISP. They will pass it along even if the domain matches. Gary Smith -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Robin Lynn Frank Sent: Tue 1/13/2004 10:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECT

RE: [SAtalk] [MAILER-DAEMON@chips.sthomas.net: Returned mail: see transcript for details]

2004-01-13 Thread Gary Smith
he one who gets yelled at all day because officedepot.com is spamming the boss again). In any event don't flame the people who are blocking you. Instead, ask why? Gary Smith -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Steve Thomas Sent: Tue 1/

RE: [SAtalk] Re: habeus

2004-01-12 Thread Gary Smith
I'll have to have my guy check again. It's also possible that it's beeing sent to his spam bucket now... Gary -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Bob Proulx Sent: Mon 1/12/2004 9:43 AM To: SpamAssassin listserve Cc:

RE: [SAtalk] forged habeus mark

2004-01-12 Thread Gary Smith
LOL... More lawyers... That's the problem :). The good spammers have them. Gary -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Bob Apthorpe Sent: Mon 1/12/2004 12:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: [SAtalk] forged

RE: [SAtalk] forged habeus mark

2004-01-12 Thread Gary Smith
As with all all other attempts we really need to see the proof in the pudding... If the zombies start using it then who do you sue? Then we receive 8400+ per 8400+ emails. Not to sound bad but I think that Habeas has an uphill battle trying to hit the spammers. They need to get some better l

RE: [SAtalk] habeus

2004-01-12 Thread Gary Smith
Updated :) (+0.1) Sorry www.habeas.com but if you were doing what you advertised and suing these suckers or lobbying congress for tougher (or actual) laws then I'd give you a -30... Try again next year. We did also report 4 emails to them recently (1 was questionable). We're still waiting

RE: [SAtalk] OT: My REALY REALY Crazy idea!! ahahahahahah

2004-01-09 Thread Gary Smith
It might have to mortgage it's house first so it can but the new cell phone booster so it can order those herbs and so it can afford that hot date tonight assuming it failed to make those ebay sales. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Todd Schuldt

RE: [SAtalk] Is BigEvil for me?

2004-01-09 Thread Gary Smith
... I know tweaking it to be smaller and possibly faster is the key but I must say that it doesn't even boggle down my system the way it is or the way it was... I started by just downloading and installing it and found that it worked great and I haven't looked back since. The bigevil catches

RE: [SAtalk] how to filter the MS Update virus?

2004-01-09 Thread Gary Smith
True regarding the file transfer but the problem is that I also provide email services for serveral small companies. It's not up to the ISP to decide what you view but we do provide virus filteration (to a limited extent) and spam markup. Gary Smith N¬HYÞéX¬²š'²ŠÞu¼

RE: [SAtalk] Another for BigEvil...

2004-01-09 Thread Gary Smith
on behalf of Gary Smith Sent: Fri 1/9/2004 10:09 AM To: Rubin Bennett; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Another for BigEvil... Rubin, The header has this line... Received: from morpheus.thatitguy.

RE: [SAtalk] Another for BigEvil...

2004-01-09 Thread Gary Smith
Rubin, The header has this line... Received: from morpheus.thatitguy.com [216.204.165.33] by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.4) for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop); Fri, 09 Jan 2004 11:25:38 -0500 (EST) Try making this change to your /etc/postfix/main.cf file: smtpd_recipient_restrictio

RE: [SAtalk] how to filter the MS Update virus?

2004-01-09 Thread Gary Smith
have something similar to please feel free to share them. Gary Smith. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Gary Funck Sent: Fri 1/9/2004 8:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: [SAtalk] how to filter the MS

RE: [SAtalk] Losing the war against spammers

2004-01-08 Thread Gary Smith
Are you running some of the additional checks such as the "BigEvil". I found that this made a world of difference. That catches 50% of my incoming spam alone. Gary -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Odhiambo Washington Sent: Thu 1/8/200

RE: [SAtalk] Where's all my spam at?

2004-01-07 Thread Gary Smith
this list though. Other sf lists are fine... Gary Smtih -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gary Smith Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 4:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Where's all my spam at? This might sound really odd

[SAtalk] Where's all my spam at?

2004-01-06 Thread Gary Smith
-out thing working :)? I thought it was just odd. Gary Smith N¬HYÞéX¬²š'²ŠÞu¼ˆÂâžìSºÚ+‰©lç(™æ§{^®Ø,ƒT^ŠãºËl…ªéz|¨º»$ŠYlJ('º—èL°ZÞx¸§»îâj[ yªçz÷«ÊØbžë¢kay¶¬†È^–[h³+vh§ Xœ’z0†ÛiÿöÊ&ý§bw]»ñ©e¡Èß~õ¢—%‰É¥©š²Æ²)íjY&j)bž b²Ôjf¬±«,Š{Z–Ib²Û,¢êÜyú+éÞm¦Ïÿ–+-²Ê.­Ç¢¸ë–+-³ùb²Ø~ìš²Æ²)íjY

RE: [SAtalk] BigEvil.cf working or not

2004-01-06 Thread Gary Smith
Brian, I thought we already answered that question... Mail headers will look something like: X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on vjo-lxutil-07.primeexalia.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8.6 required=4.0 tests=BigEvilList_1

[SAtalk] Clearing the bayes database

2004-01-06 Thread Gary Smith
Hello, What is the easiest way to reset the bayes database. I setup a test environment last night and want to start "playing" with it. We have a couple emails marked as spam (fp's) that we want to filter as ham and see how that would affect other emails. Gary Smith áŠ

RE: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin for SMTP gateway

2004-01-06 Thread Gary Smith
hand off to internal system BTW, we are not using amavisd or any other product on this box. Gary Smith -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Matt Kettler Sent: Tue 1/6/2004 7:12 AM To: Chris Maher; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc:

RE: [SAtalk] BigEvil.cf

2004-01-05 Thread Gary Smith
Wait for a while to get some spams. Then check the log file. Also, check the header of the spams in your inbox and see if they have the rules in there. If they do then it is working... You have to wait for it to catch something to know that its working. Example from an email: X-Spam-Flag:

RE: [SAtalk] Distributed HTTP server blocklist system [dhttp-bl]

2004-01-02 Thread Gary Smith
It's interesting but they keep points of failure are clear... One authority, anyone contributes, and completely resistant to pointing don't really seem to go together with what we have seen in many other blacklists. This was similar to another idea that a few of us had (not regarding blacklist b

RE: [SAtalk] Bigevil rules not being used..

2003-12-31 Thread Gary Smith
Did you restart SA? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Mathieu Nantel Sent: Tue 12/30/2003 8:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: [SAtalk] Bigevil rules not being used.. Good day,

RE: [SAtalk] Postfix unknown user (peripherally related)

2003-12-30 Thread Gary Smith
ar to this: :>/var/mail/blackhole on a 1 hour interval or something like that. Alternatively you can choose not to erase it and use it as a spam catch for feeding bayes. It should work... Gary Smith -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of

RE: [SAtalk] el1t3 h@ck0rz dictionary needed..

2003-12-30 Thread Gary Smith
in subject and they had the words credit approval on a bottom disclaimer that seemed to send it over the top. Gary Smith -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Evan Platt Sent: Monday, December 29, 2003 4:32 PM To: SpamAssassin Su

[SAtalk] spamd memory usage.

2003-12-24 Thread Gary Smith
I was wondering how much memory spamd should be using (running default rules and bigevil.cf only). It's currently using about 30mb and a decently light load day. I'm just trying to get a baseline so I can watch it grow/shrink as I add/remove rules.

[SAtalk] RE: We have big evil now we need big good...

2003-12-20 Thread Gary Smith
Makes sense. Gary Smith -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2003 12:45 PM To: Gary Smith Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: We have big evil now we need big good... On Sat, 20 Dec 2003 09:52:00 -0800

[SAtalk] We have big evil now we need big good...

2003-12-20 Thread Gary Smith
So we implemented SA some time ago because our clients were getting too much spam. Lately we have found that several html marked up emails have been getting marked as spam. These ones are clearly fp's. Some of the domains include Morningstar.com, charlesswab.com and several other financial in

RE: [SAtalk] daily / weekly reports

2003-12-17 Thread Gary Smith
Hey, Can you repost the perl script but in a text file or resend it to me? The email got mangled and I'm not a good enough perl monkey to fix it. Gary Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jens Madsen

RE: [SAtalk] Clever spam (first of many, I'm afraid...)

2003-12-15 Thread Gary Smith
that we see out of it. Gary Smith -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rubin Bennett Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2003 9:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:[SAtalk] Clever spam (first of many, I'm afraid...) <

RE: [SAtalk] filtering spam tagged email before hitting exchange 2000

2003-12-10 Thread Gary Smith
d a SMTP/postfix cluster. Best investment we ever made. Coincidentally, we have 4 new P4 servers to be put into place sitting idle for last 4 months but because the system as a whole works so well we just haven't gotten around to changing it. So for now they are backups. Gary Smith

RE: [SAtalk] Content Analysis

2003-12-09 Thread Gary Smith
OTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 9:43 AM To: Gary Smith; 'Matt Kettler'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:RE: [SAtalk] Content Analysis The answer to your question, Gary... We are an incentives marketing firm with an affiliate element. Our members can send virtual promo

RE: [SAtalk] Content Analysis

2003-12-09 Thread Gary Smith
The better question is why? Why would you need to scan your email before sending it? Are you trying to generate a threshold to see how much spam related content can go into an email before SA marks it or are you trying to find a way to get around SA? Gary Smith -Original Message

RE: [SAtalk] bigevil.cf + rsync? - Windows version - sort of

2003-12-06 Thread Gary Smith
Barry, There are some freeware dll's that you can use to do the FTP/wget so you don't have to do the shell. I don't see where you restart/reload the service??? Gary -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry Porter Sent: Saturday, D

[SAtalk] reverse scoring question

2003-12-06 Thread Gary Smith
a new rule that filteres on a specific piece of text (like the normal rules) but apply a negative score value. This would allow the NPO to tell the sender to put a key into the email to allow it to pass through. What's the best way to accomplish this? Gary Smith †+w­zf¢–+,¦‰ìo"0¸§»îâ

RE: [SAtalk] bigevil.cf + rsync?

2003-12-05 Thread Gary Smith
Sorry but brain dead me forgot to mention that the /etc/init.d/spamd file is a home cooked one (doing much more than just restart). I noticed that some people were naming it spamassassind, etc... I just took for granted people would just replace it with their own items and leave them with ju

RE: [SAtalk] bigevil.cf + rsync?

2003-12-05 Thread Gary Smith
en a character issue with the source forge footer as well. It started after the email from Peter... Peter, if your still listening what character set are you running? Gary Smith -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Chris Santerre Sent: Fri 1

RE: [SAtalk] bigevil.cf + rsync?

2003-12-04 Thread Gary Smith
5:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SAtalk] bigevil.cf + rsync? So how are you getting this cf to be included with local.cf without combining? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Smith Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:50

RE: [SAtalk] bigevil.cf + rsync?

2003-12-04 Thread Gary Smith
Thanks, I learn something new every day. Gary -Original Message- From: Peter Kiem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 12/4/2003 5:02 PM To: Gary Smith Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SAtalk] bigevil.cf + rsync

RE: [SAtalk] bigevil.cf + rsync?

2003-12-04 Thread Gary Smith
I'm actually a windows guy who has been converting to linux for some time so my scripting is rusty and primitive (cause that's what I know) but it works. This came from my /etc/cron.hourly/bigevil.sh file. #!/bin/sh # This file updates the big evil policy file for spam assassin DATE=`date +"%Y

[SAtalk] spamc question

2003-12-04 Thread Gary Smith
de to STDOUT so sendmail is sending that instead. #!/bin/sh /usr/bin/spamc | /usr/sbin/sendmail -i "$@" retval=$? echo `date` "$@" "$retval" >> /tmp/currentspamlist.txt retval=0 exit $retval Gary Smith †+w­zf¢–+,¦‰ìo"0¸§»îâj[yÊ&y©ÞÆ«¶)Ë Õ¢¸î²Û!jº^

RE: [SAtalk] reverse scoring question

2003-12-03 Thread Gary Smith
Thanks for the quick response guys... 14 minutes... Your betting Dell for their award winning response :) This will surely help. Gary Smith -Original Message- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 8:44 AM To: Gary Smith; [EMAIL

[SAtalk] reverse scoring question

2003-12-03 Thread Gary Smith
a new rule that filteres on a specific piece of text (like the normal rules) but apply a negative score value. This would allow the NPO to tell the sender to put a key into the email to allow it to pass through. What's the best way to accomplis