On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Gary Funck wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mike Burger
> > Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 2:47 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [SAtalk] Suddenly, spamd runs me out of memory (physical and
> > swap)
>
stalled from RPM, anyhow), but redoing Time::HiRes took care of
it.
I am in your debt.
If I ever find myself in the SLC area (possible, as I have friends that
live there), I owe you, at the very least, a beer or two.
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
te
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Mike Burger wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Gary Funck wrote:
>
> > Theo recommended running 'strace -pid ' on the demon when it starts
> > going into the mode where it uses up all of system memory. BTW, I'm running
> > version 2.60(cvs), s
il for some unknown reason, so he may
> be a bit quiet on the -talk and -devel lists as a result for a few
> days. :(
>
> (it looks like a bug in their filtering, but they're being slow to
> respond.)
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
te
.
> >
> > Ah. I had thought it didn't work based on some testing I did, but
> > obviously my testing was flawed.
> >
> > Thanks.
> > -d
>
>
>
> ---
> This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free
On 13 Aug 2003, Angel Gabriel wrote:
> I guess the subject line says it all!
Save the message to a separate file called "not-spam", and then run:
sa-learn --ham --mbox not-spam
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
telnet://dogpound2.citade
d others read
> only).
Something else to check is in his /etc/postfix/main.cf file. He'll have
to make sure that postfix is configured to actually use procmail as the
lcoal delivery agent by setting:
mailbox_command = /usr/bin/procmail
Otherwise, postfix will use its own, internal d
it's a closed list, of
> course.
Agreed...it's not likely that that particular message is going to pass
through the list, again, in the same form, so the bayes database wouldn't
really mean squat at that point, insofar as that message goes.
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.
n via /etc/procmailrc, or running the spamd/spamc
combination and calling spamc from /etc/procmailrc), it should be simple
to put the following into your /etc/procmailrc file:
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Pound II
usr/bin/procmail
> >
> > Otherwise, postfix will use its own, internal delivery agent, and will
> > only use procmail if the directive is in the users' .forward files.
>
> Thank you, I have made the change to postfix, all seems to be working
> well.
You're qu
message
> is. The report is in message body.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mike Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Harri Pesonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Dan Wing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Theo Van Dinter&qu
No, the answer is yes. If the report is in the headers, the body gets
left alone, and sa-learn will parse the body, just fine.
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Harri Pesonen wrote:
> Okay, this is now clear. And the answer to my question is "no".
>
> - Original Message -----
&
>live there), I owe you, at the very least, a beer or two.
>
> HOORAY for free beer!
>
> -Dan Vande More
>
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000
To be notified of updates to
arn to handle it correctly?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mike Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Harri Pesonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Dan Wing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Theo Van Dinter"
> <[EMAIL PROT
is to call the
spamassassin executable, rather than run the spamc/spamd combo.
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000
To be notified of updates to the web site, send a message to:
[EMAIL PRO
uming you store your local settings in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf,
the upgrade probably won't break anything.
However, you shouldn't be able to upgrade via CPAN, yet...unless I missed
an announcement, it hasn't been released, yet.
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.o
> > Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---
e to see the tradition continue.
>
> Rob M.
>
>
>
> ---
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
> SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
> http://www.vasoftware.com
>
> NOT be destroyed by the mark-up removal process.
>
> The script around 'spamassassin -d' being specified as the $editor,
> fulfills this, but like I said, I don't like clobbering the $editor
> function for it.
>
> Thanks for any help.
>
--
Mike Burg
hat could be better.
>
> The address is: http://www.cloudmark.com/products/spamnet/
>
> Good luck and Happy New Year!
>
> Scotty
>
>
>
> ---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
Spam e mail comes onto your
> inbox you click on the block button and it moves the message to the new Spam
> folder.
>
>
>
> BTW, I have no interest in this company other than I love the product and of
> course the price, free. what could be better.
>
> The address is: ht
ot;. when a Spam e mail comes onto your
> # inbox you click on the block button and it moves the message to the new Spam
> # folder.
> #
> #
> #
> # BTW, I have no interest in this company other than I love the product and of
> # course the price, free. what could be better.
>
Definitely not postfix.
Postfix's entries would look like:
domain.com 550 Blocked due to spamming
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 12:43:05AM -0500, Mike Burger wrote:
> > Those checks, in the syntax listed, would be added to an a
had posted these checks :
> /^From: .*@sendfree\.com/ REJECT Blocked due to spamming
> /^From: .*@hi-speedemail\.com/ REJECT Blocked due to spamming
> ...
>
> I was wondering if this would be the right solution and where I could add
> them ? Would it be in the user_prefs file
I haven't received one in a while, I'm afraid. Mainly because of my MTA
filtering.
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Jeremy Nixon wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 03:39:44PM -0500, Mike Burger wrote:
>
> > Check the footers...the end of their messages always have "High Spee
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>
--
Mike Burge
extensive local.cf, and no false positives yet. So if these high
> speed media guys are spamming me, I'm catching it. I use my real,
> unmunged address on usenet, so I'm on everyone's list.
>
> -Jeremy
--
Mike Burger
http://w
ne about these guys in the
> next version of SA. RBLs don't seem to have been blocking them yet.
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000
--
fine
> people for your assistance!
>
> Thank you in advance,
> Gregg
>
>
>
>
> ---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> __
by passing the whole spam file - i.e.
> > 'spamassassin -r < wholefile' or do I need to break out each spam email?
>
> It only accepts a single message. If you look around
> (http://www.kluge.net/~felicity/random/handlespam.txt for instance),
> there are 3rd party scri
>
> How do i put hat in my .procmailrc ?
> Just:
> --
> :0fw
> * < 256000
> | spamassassin
>
> :0:
> * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
> | spam assassin -r
> --
> doesn't seem to work, because it mai
.it's in the same documentation that tells you how to set up the
initial sitewide global procmail recipe.
You can either do this in the global procmail file, or on a user by user
basis:
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
AFter that, set up whatever actions you like.
--
Mike Burger
http://www.
eat Responsibility
> Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
> http://hpc.devchannel.org/
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamas
ger - Systems & Networking
> Hunter Engineering Company
>
>
>
> ---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTE
Thanks, Theo...much appreciated.
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 10:24:23PM -0500, Mike Burger wrote:
> > Out of curiosity..I've been rejecting with a code of 550...what's the
> > difference between 550 and 553?
>
> R
h437.com 553 REJECTED - Spammers are not
> welcome here.
> # Adpro jerks -- 20020805
> 66.148.63.0/24 553 REJECTED - Spammers are not
> welcome here.
> 66.240.190.0/24
If we're looking at methods to deal with HSM and its ilk, AdPro should
also be added to the list, if it's not, already. Seems that they're using
the same tactics as HSM, containing their spam in an image file rather
than in text.
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Hibbing MN 55746
>
> tel: 218.262.1130
> email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> _
>
>
>
> ---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
>
come to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
tel
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Mike Burger said the following on 04/12/02 15:21:
>
> > Haven't run into that problem on any of the 5 or 6 systems on which I run
> > spamd...including 2 fairly high traffic systems.
>
> None of my computers have ever be
gt; memory?
>
> You can run it ulimited.
>
> Best regards
> Martin
>
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000
---
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Mike Burger said the following on 04/12/02 12:37:
> > On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> >
> >
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] said the following on 03/12/02 22:23:
> >>
> >>>On that note, is it bes
gain (and protect
> against looping die/restarts).
Daemontools isn't/shouldn't be necessary to run spamd. In fact, the
system on which I run spamd doesn't have anything called "daemontools" (or
"daemon-tools") installed on it.
--
Mike Burger
http://w
the
> docs.
>
> Thanks again!
>
> On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Mike Burger wrote:
>
> > Hi, James...long time no see (since my time on the inet-access list).
> >
> > There's no catch-22, and I'll tell you why...and you said it yourself.
> > You need
t; ---
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tungsten T
> handheld. Power & Color in a compact size!
> http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0002en
> ___
> S
R05)
>
>
>
> -------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&
s started with
> spamd --auto-whitelist --daemonize --pidfile=/var/run/spamd.pid --local
>--allowed-ips=127.0.0.1,196.0.0.36 -D
> host is 196.0.0.38, client is 196.0.0.36
>
> > telnet 196.0.0.38 783
> Trying 196.0.0.38...
> telnet: connect to address 196.0.0.3
d
> possibly be tcpwrappers (host.allow, host.deny) too, but who uses
> those any more? :)
xinetd makes use of tcpwrappers, so it is possible to use them on a
system.
However, I'm not aware of spamd using tcpwrappers.
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog P
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Dark Alchemist wrote:
> Mike Burger wrote:
> >
> > I'm already dumping anything in razor. I have the following in my
> > .procmailrc file:
> >
> > :0:
> > * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
> > * SPAM: RAZOR2_CHECK
> > /dev/null
> 3+ to be sent to /dev/null?
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek
d by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit t
---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>
Can that be done and if so how?
>
> Thanks.
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to
should mention that I'm using RedHat 8.0
> > with sendmail, procmail, and spamassassin, as well as spamd
>
> See the FAQ -- the -H argument for spamd. Also upgrade to 2.43.
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000
--
ith leting the ContentType alone, is that the SA-Report will be
> in the begining of the html (an so not formated).
Not if you use "report_header 1"...this puts the report into the email
message header, instead of having it make a mess of the message, itself.
--
Mike Burge
s en
> defang_mime 1
>
>
> ---
> I still get the subject line rewritten every single time!
> I have nothing in ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs. It does exist, but
> there's nothing in it.
>
> How do I fix this globally?
>
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.o
spamc via the
/etc/promailrc file.
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome
mething obvious here. I have also tried just -H with no path and that
> also isn't working. Not all of my users have home directories so I can't
> rely on them being there.
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dog
On 7 Nov 2002, Chad Sorrell wrote:
> Has anyone tried integrated the f-prot virus scanner into SpamAssassin?
> Is it even possible?
Better to integrate both F-Prot and SA into a mail scanner, such as
MailScanner or AMaViS.
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Po
ive
> with them.) How can I write a test that will look at the two or
> three or N topmost Received headers?
>
>
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000
--
ve noticed that some incarnations of smrsh actually look in /usr/adm/sm.bin
> instead of /etc/smrsh.
>
>
> hth,
>
>
> Dave
>
> On Wednesday 06 November 2002 12:36 pm, Mike Burger wrote:
> > First, and foremost, try renaming your .forward to soemthing else, and
> &g
ing anything anywhere. can this be
> done.
>
> I hope I have an option other then writing a mail proxy
> to scan each mail for the tag, and then rewrite the "To:"?
> field.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Po
uda en Computación
>
>
>
> ---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm
> Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size!
> http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en
> __
by: See the NEW Palm
> Tungsten T handheld. Power & Color in a compact size!
> http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spa
> At 8:32 am -0500 31/10/02, Mike Burger wrote:
> >I saw that, last night, for the first time.
> >
> >I just restarted SA, and it started working again.
>
> Restarting hasn't worked for me, I'm afraid.. Could this be a Perl version thing? I
>am using 5.
there anything I can tweak in Spam Assassin
>to stop the errors?
>
> cheers
> Ben
>
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000
--
e that. Personally, I believe that posting
should be restricted to members, as well...but since I'm running SA and
Razor, I'm doing.ok.
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000
-
Put "defang_mime0" into your /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf file.
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Joerg Frings-Fuerst wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to disable the Body-Rewrite to text/plain, but I don't found any
> hints.
>
> Thanks for help
>
l/mail/kibab
> everything has been working great.
>
> --Kaleb
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike
> Burger
> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:07 PM
> To: Kaleb Pederson
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sub
2:59 myhostname postfix/local[12060]: 2D4FE308C4:
> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=local, delay=1, status=sent ("|IFS='
> ' && exec
> /usr/bin/procmail -f-||exit 75 #kibab")
>
> So I can now tell that it is getting forwarded through procmail but
>
COMDEX), the only Apache event to be
> fully supported by the ASF. http://www.apachecon.com
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>
--
Mike Burger
http:
ll Razor, but can
still be configured to call SpamAssassin, which in turn will call Razor2,
then it will end up doing exactly what I want to do, in the first place.
So, the question, now, is when do we figure amavisd-new-20020630 to be
"stabilized" enough to be used?
Thanks.
--
s the option of not running razor
from within amavisd? Or will it support the use of Razor2?
20020517 can't seem to run my properly installed Razor 2.20, so the
spamscan consistently fails.
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
telnet://dogpound2.cita
s.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0002en
>
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
t
And you sent this to the list...why?
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Martin Balvers wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:15:24 -0700
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Spamassassin-talk -- confirmation of subscription -- request 737097
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the D
other people are finding that these rules are actually
> effective in flagging more spam than false positives.
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000
> ---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, local.spamassassin wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 14:58:04 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike
> Burger) wrote:
>
> >The answer to this question is in the SA FAQ at www.spamassassin.org
>
> Damn! Sorry, I normally do look in places like that first.
No problem
Oh, heck...how'd I miss that? If I had seen that, I'd not have been
bothering to build from SRPM. Doh!!!
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 03:29:38PM -0500, Mike Burger wrote:
> > Except that you built them for athlon, and there is on
> > below.
>
> Yeah, there seems to be some issue with MakeMaker that is causing these
> issues. If you're running 5.6.1, you can just download the actual RPMs
> since that's what I built them for.
>
>
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit th
Permission
> denied Can't call method "log" on unblessed reference at
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Razor2/Client/Agent.pm line 211.
>
> My object-oriented perl isn't good enough to really
> understand what's going on here so any
Well, the man directories...that showed up for the first time with 2.43.
With 2.41 and 2, It was just /var/tmp/spamassassin-root/usr/bin/* that
wasn't "found by glob".
I'll try the rpm -bi...
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 09:57:
I'll send you the new
> version, give it a shot and let me know how it goes.
>
> It won't solve the problem with no /usr/bin and no perl modules, but...
>
>
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Pound I
/var/tmp/spamassassin-root/usr/share/man/man3/*
Any ideas on what I need to do to get past this so that I can create an
installable RPM?
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
telnet://dogpound2.citadel.
Follow up from the Razor folks, regarding razor-for-pay.
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 12:29:05 -0700
From: Vipul Ved
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Simon Matthews wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Mike Burger wrote:
>
> > keeping in mind, also, that you didn't include the headers, so from what
> > you presented us, there was no way for us to know from whence it came.
>
> Hey, I just posted
keeping in mind, also, that you didn't include the headers, so from what
you presented us, there was no way for us to know from whence it came.
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Simon Matthews wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Mike Burger wrote:
>
> > It is possible that Mr. Bob is subscri
Well, I did say "possible"
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Simon Matthews wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Mike Burger wrote:
>
> > It is possible that Mr. Bob is subscribed to one of the same lists as you.
> >
> Except that both of the SPAMs came from very similar IP ad
;
>
>
> ---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
uot;The box said 'Requires
> >Wananchi Online Ltd. www.wananchi.com Windows 95, NT, or better,'
> >Tel: +254 2 313985-9 +254 2 313922 so I installed FreeBSD."
> >GSM: +254 72 743223 +254 733 744121 This sig is McQ! :-)
> >
> >
> >If you only have a hammer, you tend to se
;
> >> Doing the blogging thang again at http://www.groovymother.com/ <<
>
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000
---
This
---
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>
--
M
If you have multiple network interfaces, and you want other systems to be
able to run spamc to connect to your spamd daemon, you might tell the
system to listen on all interfaces/ip addresses to accomplish this.
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Robin Lynn Frank wrote:
> >From man spamd
> -i ipaddress, --l
It's a normal behavior. If you do not have a specific MX record for the
domain, the mail servers will look to the A record for the domain. So, if
www.domain.com has the same A record as domain.com, or if domain.com is
CNAME'd to www.domain.com, than that system will receive the mail for
doma
In that case, my suggestion is to download/install mailscanner or
amavisd-new, and configure it to make use of spamassassin for you. I
personally use amavis to do virus scanning, and SA via procmail, but am
planning on configuring amavis to call SA.
In any event, amavis (and mailscanner) acts
I believe this is a result of calling procmail from within procmail.
Current distributions of sendmail are configured for procmail to be used
as the default delivery agent. Adding a call to procmail in your .forward
file, which has already been read by procmail, just means that procmail
gets
Yup...Sendmail was already configured to use procmail as the local
delivery agent...calling it, again, via the .forward file, was confusing
the issue.
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Fogarty, Chris wrote:
> Oddly when I removed the .forward, I stared getting the
>
> ***SUSPECTED SPAM***
>
> he
No...you're probably right on that one...I don't think the drones at
Mindspring are that far-thinking.
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 07:17:46AM -0500, Mike Burger wrote:
> > According to the dsbl.org removal system, there's
According to the dsbl.org removal system, there's already a request in to
have the mindspring IP removed from their list.
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Someone poisoning DSBL?
>
> Sep 21 00:30:45 eclectic sendmail[13924]: g8L4Uim5013924: ruleset=check_rcpt,
>arg1=<[EMAIL PRO
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
