They can also get around the -H by upgrading to Razor 2.20. On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Justin Mason wrote:
> > Mark R. Cervarich said: > > On the front page of, http://www.spamassassin.org/ spam-idendification > > tactics are said to include: > > * Razor: Vipul's Razor.... > > > > I have Razor running as well as SpamAssassin. Procmail filters > > SpamAssassin caught mail into 1 folder and Razor mail into another > > (see snippet of my .procmailrc at end of message). > > > > My question is -- at what point does SpamAssassin use Razor? Because > > I'm not seeing any points attributable to Razor in the Spam headers. > > (http://www.spamassassin.org/tests.html tells me that there are 2 > > tests that use RAZOR: RAZOR_CHECK and RAZOR2_CHECK > > > > ...As I type this I realize I should mention that I'm using RedHat 8.0 > > with sendmail, procmail, and spamassassin, as well as spamd > > See the FAQ -- the -H argument for spamd. Also upgrade to 2.43. -- Mike Burger http://www.bubbanfriends.org Visit the Dog Pound II BBS telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000 ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL, click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate: http://www.gothawte.com/rd524.html _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
