On 25 Nov 2003, Scott A Crosby wrote:
> But to everyone else bitching about how SA and Perl is easy to install
> and 'not a problem'. You're wrong. Unlike the other systems reviewed
> SA isn't a drop-in system or box. It *does* require more effort to set
> up. Stop maligning him for claiming other
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Daniel Quinlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-27 20:12:53 -0700]:
> > My problem with SPEWS is that it is not an accurate way to tag spam.
> > There are too many FPs.
>
> I have heard a lot of derisive commentary about relays.osirusoft.com
> but people still
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> The advantage of Osirusoft.com is that you need only one net query to get
> results from all those RBLs merged by Osirusoft. Also should it avoid
> double scores because a site listed in two lists returns only one result.
>
> Malte
>
> P.S.: Those are
ition from lots of
Spamassassin users.
As a start, I wonder if there's any general consensus, one way or the
other, on this list.
Miles Fidelman
**
The Center for Civic Networking PO Box 600618
Miles R. Fidelman
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Matt Kettler wrote:
> As far as trustworthy goes, I trust osirusoft to pretty much list everyone
> that's questionable and all their neighbors. I don't trust it to be low
> collateral damage, hence I don't use them as a flat-out blocklist, and I
> generally assign them fewer
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Darren Coleman wrote:
> Has anyone had any experience of dealings with Osirusoft and can
> comment/suggest a course of action? Their website doesn't seem to provide
> any specific contact information and - and this would be funny if it weren't
> tragic - attempting to email
Hi Folks,
I've been running spamassassin 2.20, and been waiting to upgrade to 2.41
until it seems stable. At this point, I've been seeing a lot fewer bug
reports, and a variety of references to patches, but... I don't see either
a patch directory or a 2.42, and all the development seems to be fo
---
(C) Copyright 2002, Onion, Inc.
---
www.theonion.com/onion3825/anti-spam_legislation.html
AMERICA'S FINEST NEWS S
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, tang wrote:
> Just installed SpamAssassin on our Sun's Ultra10 running Solaris 7,
> but it doesn't work:
>
> tang@bionmr3:~/bin/SpamAssassin 124>./spamassassin < sample-nonspam.txt
> Can't locate Time/HiRes.pm in @INC (@INC contains: ../lib lib
This isn't a version problem.
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Simon Lyall wrote:
Does the latest release of spamassassin support Razor v2 now?
**
The Center for Civic Networking PO Box 600618
Miles R. Fidelman, President & Newtonville, MA 0
Is there a specific test for Korean characters?
**
Network Technology Corporation PO Box 600618
Miles R. Fidelman, PresidentNewtonville, MA 02460-0006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]617-
On Tue, 7 May 2002, Doug Crompton wrote:
> I don't know. I changed mine in the 50_scores file. It obviously works
> there.
I think I'll try that next.
I was just hoping to avoid making changes in the rules files, to keep
upgrading simple.
Miles
___
Hi,
Per a recent suggestion, I put the following in my local
.spamassassin/user_prefs file:
score LARGE_HEX 5.00
in an attempt to catch some of the various viruses floating around.
The thing is, that while a number of messages are getting caught by the
LARGE_HEX test, the score is bein
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Vivek Khera wrote:
> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 09:54:46 -0400
> From: Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Pete O'Hara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spamassassin on a mail relay
>
> > "PO" == Pete O'Hara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
Ed and Bart,
Thanks for your suggestions. By putting them together, and adding one item
(see below), I solved my problem.
Thanks!
Miles
> > > On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> > > >
Ed,
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote:
> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 12:58:30 -0400
> From: CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Miles Fidelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Spam Assassin L
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote:
> >
> > > :0 fw
> > > |spamassassin -d
> > >
> > > :0:
> > > $MAIL
> >
> >
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote:
> > The two obvious approaches seem to have problems:
> >
> > |spamassassin -d |mail $MAIL -- spamassassin will simply reprocess the
> > message, and, in any case, the original headers won't show up properly
> >
> > |spamassassin -d >>$MAIL
Dan,
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Daniel Liston wrote:
> Here is another idea, and requires monitoring, but is easier than
> trying to unmunge a majordomo bounce to a spammer;
>
> /etc/aliases
> majordomo: "|/usr/lib/majordomo/wrapper majordomo",filename
>
> Filename is actually an archive of all message
Theo,
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> majordomo doesn't actually change anything. the bounce is essentially a new message
>with the old
> message as the body. so you could do something like this:
>
> perl -nle 'next if (1../^\s*$/) or /^>From /; print;' < bounce > fresh
>
> > So.
essage to razor.
So... has anybody already solved this problem - say by writing a script
that does this all automagically?
Thanks very much,
Miles Fidelman
**
Network Technology Corporation PO Box 600618
Mi
On 6 Apr 2002, Nils Vogels wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 00:44, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> > Maybe somebody can help me with the following:
> >
> > - I've just installed spamassassin 2.11 on my machine (Sun, Solaris)
> > - it works from the command line
> > -
ed into the ozone
Anybody have any suggestions as to what's going on and how to fix it?
Thanks much,
Miles Fidelman
**
Network Technology Corporation PO Box 600618
Miles R. Fidelman, PresidentNew
23 matches
Mail list logo
