k Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
/
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing
Nov 2003 11:16:03 -0600, maximo lopez wrote:
I don't know how to do that , that is why I can't
please help me
- Original Message -
From: "Evan Platt" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "SpamAssassin" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 10:22 AM
What he is saying is : include in your post the file procmail.rc . You'll have to find it, but on most redhat systems it is in /etc/mail/spamassassin ... you should probably do a find on the file though, for safety's sake.
Mairhtin
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 11:16:03 -0600, maximo lopez
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Log Question...
Below is a snippet from a recent post to the list:
Oct 30 14:12:40 ns1 MailScanner[3201]: Message h9UMAPR07828 from
61.59.154.73 ()
to userdomain.com is spam, SpamAssassin (score=28.325, required
5, BAYES_99
6.00
-Original Message-
From: Joe Julian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 8:07 AM
To: 'Spamassassin-Talk'
Subject: [SAtalk] This isn't Porn???
This message wasn't tagged by any porn rules. Looking at the rules, it
doesn't look like this is porn, hehe. I understand
Re: [SAtalk] PowerMail, PowerMTA, was (Grr, another one!)
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=6199187
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general/31476
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-talkm=106521332813096w=2
Jonathan Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED
-and-the-stick.com.')
Does not seem to be related to eval:check_rbl (2.60) vs rbleval:check_rbl
(2.55).
See also:
RE: Can't locate Net/DNS/RR/SOA.pm after updating from
Mail-SpamAssassin-2.55 to Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60
After updating from Mail-SpamAssassin-2.55
to Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60 {Installed
Error: Can't locate Net/DNS/RR/SOA.pm in @INC
Related to Received headers, and BlackList(s) query.
After much more testing, ...
spamassassin -D ~/saetc/mail/spamassassin/sample-nonspam.txt
results in an error: Can't locate Net/DNS/RR/SOA.pm in @INC
(@INC contains: /home/anitech/sausr/lib
Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60 {Installed for Personal Use (Not System-Wide)}
Can't locate Net/DNS/RR/SOA.pm
spamassassin -D ~/saetc/mail/spamassassin/sample-nonspam.txt
...
Can't locate Net/DNS/RR/SOA.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/home/anitech/sausr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0
... at (eval 19
After updating from Mail-SpamAssassin-2.55
to Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60 {Installed for Personal Use (Not System-Wide)}
Can't locate Net/DNS/RR/SOA.pm
perl, v5.8.0 built for i386-freebsd
Never came up with 2.55
spamassassin -D ~/saetc/mail/spamassassin/sample-spam.txt works fine
spamassassin
Settings in individual users' ~/usr/someuser/.spamassassin/user_prefs file
are not being utilized by SA.
Q: If I have in local.cf a setting of:
required_hits5
if in a user's individual user_prefs file they have:
required_hits1
will the fact that the global file contains 5
of course ;-)).
Balam
-Original Message-
From: Kristoffersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 1:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Test rule in spamassassin blocks my domains
Maybe it would be an idea to add domains that have problems
~/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf is:
required_hits 5
rewrite_subject 1
spam_level_stars0
subject_tag [PROBABLE SPAM: _HITS_]
fold_headers0
use_terse_report0
report_safe 1
clear_report_template
report This mail is probably spam
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
PROTECTED]
X-Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=7.9 required=5.0
tests=BAYES_95,NO_REAL_NAME,X_PURGATE_SPAM
version=2.55-8.08_31.08.2003_00_03
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55
-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55-8.08_31.08.2003_00_03
(1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
X-Spam-Report: Start SpamAssassin results
7.90 points, 5 required;
Message preview:
[skipped multipart/related attachment] [...]
Content analysis details:
NO_REAL_NAME (0.5 points) Absenderzeile enthält
Dirk,
I noticed that same effect while reading this list (sa-talk). Turns out
it was my flawed attempt at processed emails only once by spamassassin.
My faulty logic in procmail skipped piping through spamassassin if the
header X-Spam-Status already existed.
Since some of the emails from
SpamAssassin 2.55, personal use (single user install)
Mail::SpamAssassin
Is there a way to use a directory path for the userprefs_filename
or site_rules_filename instead of a single file,
to have multiple .cf files loaded?
I am passing rules_filename a directory path for the main
rules
/spamassassin/local.cf -- I made a typo in the bayes_path
setting (/var/amavisd/var/amavis/.spamassassin/bayes instead of the
correct /var/amavis/.spamassassin/bayes).
Thanks to the author of the README.chroot document that comes with
amavisd for suggesting using the absolute path to the symlink (doh
if
you are at all likely to interested in viaragas, porn or bankers from
Nigera.
Would it be best if I did not borrow spam from other people?
Worked for me. I needed to learn/test spamassassin before rolling it
out on a client's mail server, so I borrowed a bunch of spam to prime
the bayesian
Any ideas on how to get SpamAssassin to query one of the
osirusoft mirrors? (Osirusoft has been experiencing
DOS/DDOS on and off for a few weeks, but some of the other
(not *.osirusoft.com) authoritive DNS seem to be working fine.)
The SA config is as follows
header RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, SpamAssassin wrote:
Any ideas on how to get SpamAssassin to query one of the
osirusoft mirrors? (Osirusoft has been experiencing
DOS/DDOS on and off for a few weeks, but some of the other
(not *.osirusoft.com) authoritive DNS seem to be working
Anyone have an idea of the Mail::SpamAssassin
memory requirements?
I realize it will vary depending on configuration /
options / rules / ... in use.
(SpamAssassin 2.55 on a per user install
through IMAPAssassin. {perl 5.008}))
Current config
# ok_languagesen
ok_locales en
Your mail to 'Spamassassin-announce' with the subject
Re: Movie
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Post to moderated list
Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive
notification of the moderator's
I am trying to evaluate SpamAssassin 2.55 on a per user install
through IMAPAssassin. (perl 5.008)
When the message is passed to Mail::SpamAssassin,
the score always comes back as 0 point,
If the message is written to a file,
then passed to spamassassin -t input output,
the score points
jm writes:
SpamAssassin writes:
I am trying to evaluate SpamAssassin 2.55 on a per user install
through IMAPAssassin. (perl 5.008)
When the message is passed to Mail::SpamAssassin,
the score always comes back as 0 point,
If the message is written to a file,
then passed to spamassassin -t
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http://hpc.devchannel.org/
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL
--On Thursday, December 12, 2002 3:07 PM -0500 Tom Allison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| My question is if anyone knows anything about running
| spamassassin/spamc/spamd under sieve.
Sure, sort of. Though, I'm using amavisd-new[1] with postfix[2]. It's not
that it runs under sieve, you simply
LMTP-SPAMASS-RELAY
A SpamAssassin daemon which trivially accepts LMTP connections
(usually from sendmail). It immediately starts proxying/relaying the
connection to some other pre-existing LMTP socket. When the data
commands are seen, the headers and body of the email
Hello,
Is there a way to tell spamassassin to show me all the email addresses and
thier associated scores that are in my whitelist? I know how to add and
remove them, but I'd also like to know what is actually in the list.
Thanks!
-Ron Roth
--On Wednesday, December 4, 2002 11:13 AM -0500 Allison, Thomas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I've been looking at bogofilter for a while and they have a number of
| options that I hope will be somewhat replicated in SpamAssassin:
Could perhaps SA simply call bogofilter?
Amos
to use the rsync file?
Amos
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https
Looks like we are having a razor problem?
Servers seem to have not been responding, for about 2 hours now.
Anyone else noticed that?
Yup, I got way more spam than usual this morning... When I looked
through the headers of the messages I noticed that SpamAssassin hadn't
even touched them
is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
-Original Message-
From: Frank Pineau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Martes, 08 de Octubre de 2002 18:49
To: Spamassassin List
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] New spammer trick (aka: stupid browser trick)
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 14:37:57 -0700, you wrote:
| 0xD5.0xEF.0x8F.0x9D
I'm running SpamAssassin 2.01 on a FreeBSD box, build from
the FreeBSD ports collection. I recall that when I built it
it also pulled in p5-Net-DNS.
I recently updated the ports collection and see that SpamAssassin
is now at 2.20. However if I do a make in the ports dir it starts
pulling
, this fixed it fine.
Hard to know where to look.
It's a pity that there isn't a way to integrate SpamAssassin into
sendmail without using milter since (for me) it's two new software
items and therefore two unknowns added to a reliable system.
I saw another poster mention MimeDefang, I had a quick
47 matches
Mail list logo
