ngamabobber.
Jennifer
>
> -Chris
>
> Jennifer Wheeler said:
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:spamassassin-
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Thielen
>>> Sent: Thursday, Octo
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:spamassassin-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Thielen
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 4:22 PM
> To: Spamassassin-Talk
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] [RD] Open source is Naughty!!!
>
> I figure now m
4:22 PM
>> To: Spamassassin-Talk
>> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] [RD] Open source is Naughty!!!
>>
>> I figure now might be a decent time to mention this:
>> http://www.exit0.us/index.php/ChrissMediocreObfuScript
>
>
> "Thingamabobbers" ...heh
>
&
F][sz52]\b/i
>
> Jennifer
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:spamassassin-
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Radford
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 3:13 PM
>> To: Antony Stone
>> Cc: "Spamassassin-Ta
rd
> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 3:13 PM
> To: Antony Stone
> Cc: "Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)"
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] [RD] Open source is Naughty!!!
>
> At Wed Oct 29 19:33:00 2003, Antony Stone wrote:
> >
> > Rather than focusing on what you *d
At 10/29/03 10:53 AM , Chris Santerre wrote:
I have to change a rule and I want to do it nicely. So suggestions needed.
The rule is :
SUBJECT_XXX
and in it, it has naughty words. One of which it looks for is :
/pen.s/i
Which was just trying to get past obfuscations. Well, anything that
mentions:
"O
Chris Santerre wrote:
I'm not sure if this is a Spam or legit! Anyone ever got one of these from
the list?
A bounce message from someone whose susbcribed e-mail address is no
longer valid? Sure, I see them all the time.
This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris
Santerre
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 3:12 PM
To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
Subject: [SAtalk] What on earth is this? FW: Undeliverable Mail: RE:
[SAtalk] [RD] Open source is Naughty!!!
I'm not sure if this is a Spam or legit! Anyone ever got o
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is a Spam or legit! Anyone ever got one of these from
> the list?
I got one of these too. I think a list subscriber has a broken 'bounce'
mechanism, or their domain just cavved, but the message did not provide
any details on whose
5.comingsoon.pool.com with local (Exim 4.20)
id 1AExKY-000194-2h
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 20:54:14 +
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: *SPAM* Undeliverable Mail: RE: [SAtalk] [RD] Open source is
Naughty!!!
In-
>
> Obvious examples are covered by /pen[i1l]s/i - presumably not
> too many things
> need adding to the middle regex to match the strings you're
> interested in?
>
> Just a thought.
>
> Antony.
>
One would think that. But I had never heard of an "galiec i" or whatever
the heck they were us
At Wed Oct 29 19:33:00 2003, Antony Stone wrote:
>
> Rather than focusing on what you *don't* want to catch with this
> rule, how about concentrating on what you do want to catch?
>
> Obvious examples are covered by /pen[i1l]s/i - presumably not too
> many things need adding to the middle regex t
At 01:53 PM 10/29/2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
SUBJECT_XXX
and in it, it has naughty words. One of which it looks for is :
/pen.s/i
Rather than do the ^oO thing, why not modify your . to exclude spaces:
/pen\Ss/
This will look for a "non whitespace" in that spot.
I'd also suggest putting a \b at
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> At 01:53 PM 10/29/2003, Chris Santerre wrote:
> >SUBJECT_XXX
> >and in it, it has naughty words. One of which it looks for is :
> >/pen.s/i
>
> Rather than do the ^oO thing, why not modify your . to exclude spaces:
On Wednesday 29 October 2003 6:53 pm, Chris Santerre wrote:
> I have to change a rule and I want to do it nicely. So suggestions needed.
> The rule is :
> SUBJECT_XXX
> and in it, it has naughty words. One of which it looks for is :
> /pen.s/i
> Which was just trying to get past obfuscations. Well
--On Wednesday, October 29, 2003 1:53 PM -0500 Chris Santerre
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have to change a rule and I want to do it nicely. So suggestions needed.
> The rule is :
> SUBJECT_XXX
> and in it, it has naughty words. One of which it looks for is :
> /pen.s/i
> Which was just tryin
I have to change a rule and I want to do it nicely. So suggestions needed.
The rule is :
SUBJECT_XXX
and in it, it has naughty words. One of which it looks for is :
/pen.s/i
Which was just trying to get past obfuscations. Well, anything that
mentions:
"Open source" in subject gets tagged as naught
17 matches
Mail list logo
