Re: [SAtalk] Attaboy

2003-05-31 Thread Bob Apthorpe
On Thu, 29 May 2003 15:49:40 -0700 Gary Funck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First, let me second those att-a-boys. Spamassassin is a demonstration of what a full spectrum, high technology implementation can do. It solves an important problem, and solves it well. Congrats to the SA team (and to the

Re: [SAtalk] Attaboy

2003-05-31 Thread Vivek Khera
SP == Steve Prior [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: SP I'd start to question what that employee is doing that is getting him SP on that many spammer lists - does this employee actually do stuff or just SP register his email address with pr0n sites all day... I've had the same email address since 1994.

RE: [SAtalk] Attaboy

2003-05-31 Thread Chris Santerre
/maillog.4 Relay denied 770 1004 996 1036 1228 SPAM Identified 353 438 391 353 328 Clean Emails 1652 1954 2216 1725 2081 -Original Message- From: Jack Gostl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 3:18 PM To: SpamAssassin listserve Subject: [SAtalk] Attaboy Someone

Re: [SAtalk] Attaboy

2003-05-31 Thread Kelly Corkill
Same here, just because I'm lazy and don't want to change my email address - used since 94 - not to mention having catch-alls for several domains, other addresses currently posted as mailtos on the web, in old deja/google archives etc. None ever submitted to a p0rn site. I also use domain

[SAtalk] Attaboy

2003-05-30 Thread Jack Gostl
Someone posted a message here saying that SA really kicks ass. I know it is an international community on this list, so let's make sure we all understand it was a compliment. It was also an understatement. Amidst all the questions in here, I wouldn't want the developers to lose sight of how well

Re: [SAtalk] Attaboy

2003-05-30 Thread Jonathan Nichols
I now have users complaining that they receive as much as 5 spams out of 500. This is absurdity worthy of the Marx brothers. Nice job. Keep at it guys. Amen to that! 5 spams? Heh, show them how much they WOULD get if it wasn't for SpamAssassin. :) spam-stats from one of the co-lo machines:

RE: [SAtalk] Attaboy

2003-05-30 Thread Stewart, John
Aye, ATTABOY! Definitely a kick ass piece of software. spam-stats from one of the co-lo machines: spam: 304 clean: 80 skipped: 0 total: 384 processed: 384 The mail log was rotated earlier this morning. And yes, the stats are accurate.. only 80 legit mails, everything else SPAM. If

Re: [SAtalk] Attaboy

2003-05-30 Thread Mark Thornton
- From: Jonathan Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: SpamAssassin listserve [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 2:50 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Attaboy I now have users complaining that they receive as much as 5 spams out of 500. This is absurdity worthy of the Marx brothers. Nice

Re: [SAtalk] Attaboy

2003-05-30 Thread Mike Batchelor
--On Thursday, May 29, 2003 12:50 PM -0700 Jonathan Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: spam-stats from one of the co-lo machines: spam: 304 clean: 80 skipped: 0 total: 384 processed: 384 OK, time for show and tell, I guess. This is yesterday on one of my two SA+MD relays: spam: 34,587 clean:

RE: [SAtalk] Attaboy

2003-05-30 Thread Marek Dohojda
PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 2:17 PM Subject: [SAtalk] Attaboy Someone posted a message here saying that SA really kicks ass. I know it is an international community on this list, so let's make sure we all understand it was a compliment. It was also an understatement. Amidst all

Re: [SAtalk] Attaboy

2003-05-30 Thread Jeremy Oddo
Jack Gostl said: Someone posted a message here saying that SA really kicks ass. Hee Hee. I know I posted that very saying about SA, but I did so on the vpopmail maillist. I know it is an international community on this list, so let's make sure we all understand it was a compliment. It was

Re: [SAtalk] Attaboy

2003-05-30 Thread Steve Prior
Jeremy Oddo wrote: I agree fully. I have a very light-traffic server (10 users across 3 domains). One of our employees would receive 120+ SPAM messages a day. I decided to put SA in place mainly for him (although I put every user on it). He's still getting a lot of SPAM...it's just not making

Re: [SAtalk] Attaboy

2003-05-30 Thread Mike Smith
OK, time for show and tell, I guess. This is yesterday on one of my two SA+MD relays: spam: 34,587 clean: 16,882 bounced: 426 discarded: 719 skipped: 6310 processed: 58,924 (I forgot to count access_db bounces, oh well... this shows what SA+MD alone processed) I have a 2nd one in

RE: [SAtalk] Attaboy

2003-05-30 Thread Matt Kettler
Wow, I don't think I've seen an AOL! thread on SATalk before :) But hey while were at it.. Me Too! :) ( For an explanation of AOL! see http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/A/AOL.html ) --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office

RE: [SAtalk] Attaboy

2003-05-30 Thread Gary Funck
First, let me second those att-a-boys. Spamassassin is a demonstration of what a full spectrum, high technology implementation can do. It solves an important problem, and solves it well. Congrats to the SA team (and to the supporting cast of Razor, Pyzor, DCC and the RBL's). OK, time for show

Re: [SAtalk] Attaboy

2003-05-30 Thread Steve Wilson
Jack Gostl wrote: Someone posted a message here saying that SA really kicks ass. I know it is an international community on this list, so let's make sure we all understand it was a compliment. It was also an understatement. Amidst all the questions in here, I wouldn't want the developers to lose

Re: [SAtalk] Attaboy

2003-05-30 Thread Jack Gostl
I now have users complaining that they receive as much as 5 spams out of 500. This is absurdity worthy of the Marx brothers. Nice job. Keep at it guys. Amen to that! 5 spams? Heh, show them how much they WOULD get if it wasn't for SpamAssassin. :) spam-stats from one of the

Re: [SAtalk] Attaboy

2003-05-30 Thread Jack Gostl
I'd start to question what that employee is doing that is getting him on that many spammer lists - does this employee actually do stuff or just register his email address with pr0n sites all day... No... it doesn't take much at all. The employee as the president of the company. He made a

Re: [SAtalk] Attaboy

2003-05-30 Thread Steve Prior
Jack Gostl wrote: No... it doesn't take much at all. The employee as the president of the company. He made a bunch of sales on eBay, purchased a handful of things from online outfits, and POW! He was getting upwards of 200 per day. I can understand it happening to me, I post in various newsgroups