Hi Mark,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Ritchie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Exessive HTML Code
Do you really think it would be a problem if we found more
than 3 instances of i/i in each
I've
added the popcorn, blackhair, and weeds rules a while back, but I've noticed
that I'm still getting quite a few spams messages per day. It always seems
to be the most offensive porn and such that makes it
through.
Here
is an example of the source that get's through
HTMLhtmlbody
Mark Ritchie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, as you can see the trick here to fool spamassassin is the
i and b tags.
I don't think that's what's fooling SA. SA strips all that
stuff out before looking for phrases. The problem is the lack
of phrases to trigger on.
Would it be possible to
]
Subject: [SAtalk] Exessive HTML Code
I've added the popcorn, blackhair, and weeds rules a while back, but I've
noticed that I'm still getting quite a few spams messages per day. It
always seems to be the most offensive porn and such that makes it through.
Here is an example of the source that get's
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:35 AM
To: Mark Ritchie; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Exessive HTML Code
Yes, this would be possible.
describe MY_RBDY_EXSV_TAGMY: Excessive HTML Tags
rawbody MY_RBDY_EXSV_TAG/[bi]\/[bi]/i
scoreMY_RBDY_EXSV_TAG
a single test in 20_head_tests.cf called TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL that
uses backreferences in this way, so I'm presuming it works.
-- Scott
-Original Message-
From: Mark Ritchie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Exessive HTML
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark
Ritchie
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Exessive HTML Code
I've added the popcorn, blackhair, and weeds rules a while back, but
I've
Do you really think it would be a problem if we found more
than 3 instances of i/i in each email to mark it as spam?
Maybe I could just score it lower per instance, say .2
There were 58 instances of i/i in this email and 63
instances of b/b.
A test that counted .1 per instance in a
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Mark Ritchie wrote:
Now, as you can see the trick here to fool spamassassin is the i and
b tags. Would it be possible to make a rule or adjust the rules so
the i/i scores high? There is nothing inbetween and I'd have to
say anyone sending messages like this is obviously
.
Jennifer
-Original Message-
From: Mark Ritchie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Exessive HTML Code
I've added the popcorn, blackhair, and weeds rules a while back, but
I've
noticed that I'm still getting quite
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Mark Ritchie wrote:
Now, as you can see the trick here to fool spamassassin is
the i and
b tags. Would it be possible to make a rule or adjust
the rules so
the i/i scores high? There is nothing inbetween and I'd have to
say anyone sending messages like this
11 matches
Mail list logo