Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin and LDAP

2003-06-04 Thread Keith Olmstead
Keith Olmstead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin and LDAP Keith Olmstead wrote: > Well it looks like it was not ldap that that was my problem. I don't think it was > perl either. I changed some options around now, using the -x option

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin and LDAP

2003-06-04 Thread Tony Earnshaw
Keith Olmstead wrote: Well it looks like it was not ldap that that was my problem. I don't think it was perl either. I changed some options around now, using the -x option (don't look at users prefs) and it filters fine. I don't know why it was not working without the -x but it is filtering fin

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin and LDAP

2003-06-04 Thread Keith Olmstead
e at the moment. Thanks for the help everyone. --Keith On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Keith Olmstead wrote: Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 13:40:41 -0500 (CDT) From: Keith Olmstead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Spamassassin and LDAP Hello, Trying to get SA working with LDAP users.

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin and LDAP

2003-06-04 Thread Jason Grove
Actually Solaris 9 comes with Iplanet LDAP 5.1 built in, so you may be having library problems I don't use nss_ldap or pam_ldap on my Solaris 9 boxes. They all use the pam_unix which has ldap support built in to it.. Make sure your person has both posixaccount and shadowaccount in their object

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin and LDAP

2003-06-04 Thread Tony Earnshaw
Keith Olmstead wrote: I am sorry, I just got caught up in something else and forgot to add version #s. Please forgive me. Believe it or not I don't even believe that pam_ldap is installed. nss_ldap is 205 and openldap version 2.0.27, running on solaris 9.

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin and LDAP

2003-06-04 Thread Keith Olmstead
TED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin and LDAP Keith Olmstead wrote: > Trying to get SA working with LDAP users. I know this can work, but I am running > into problems. I create a user local on the box and it filters fine, but when I try > to filter a user that

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin and LDAP

2003-06-04 Thread Tony Earnshaw
Keith Olmstead wrote: id and the user shows the correct uid and gid and getent passwd displays info like it would be in the passwd file. Openldap is currently working with Sendmail. Normally the users don't have shell accounts, but I am adding a shell in ldap for my test user and I can not su, o

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin and LDAP

2003-06-04 Thread Keith Olmstead
3 Jun 2003, Tony Earnshaw wrote: Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 11:10:21 +0200 From: Tony Earnshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin and LDAP Keith Olmstead wrote: > Trying to get SA working with LDAP users. I know this can work, but I am running > int

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin and LDAP

2003-06-03 Thread Tony Earnshaw
Keith Olmstead wrote: Trying to get SA working with LDAP users. I know this can work, but I am running into problems. I create a user local on the box and it filters fine, but when I try to filter a user that is in LDAP it is not working. I changed the shell to a valid shell, and it seems that

[SAtalk] Spamassassin and LDAP

2003-06-03 Thread Keith Olmstead
Hello, Trying to get SA working with LDAP users. I know this can work, but I am running into problems. I create a user local on the box and it filters fine, but when I try to filter a user that is in LDAP it is not working. I changed the shell to a valid shell, and it seems that it is pickin