Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist for Charlie Root

2002-03-19 Thread Craig Hughes
Oh, 62. I thought you were talking about 47. C On Mon, 2002-03-18 at 22:41, Rob McMillin wrote: > Craig R Hughes wrote: > > >Rob McMillin wrote: > > > >>1) Pick up the current CVS tree and set up a short-circuit rule that > >>allows multiple tests. > >> > > > >Wow! Did someone implement that

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist for Charlie Root

2002-03-18 Thread Rob McMillin
Craig R Hughes wrote: >Rob McMillin wrote: > >>1) Pick up the current CVS tree and set up a short-circuit rule that >>allows multiple tests. >> > >Wow! Did someone implement that while I wasn't looking? Seriously though, I >don't think that's in CVS yet. > It is according to bug 62: http://b

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist for Charlie Root

2002-03-18 Thread Craig R Hughes
Rob McMillin wrote: > 1) Pick up the current CVS tree and set up a short-circuit rule that > allows multiple tests. Wow! Did someone implement that while I wasn't looking? Seriously though, I don't think that's in CVS yet. > 2) Use ~/.procmailrc to do a multipart test and skip SpamAssassin

RE: [SAtalk] Whitelist for Charlie Root

2002-03-18 Thread CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
arch 17, 2002 5:03 AM > To: 'David G. Andersen' > Cc: 'CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson'; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Whitelist for Charlie Root > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hrm... > > I'm doin

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist for Charlie Root

2002-03-17 Thread Rob McMillin
David G. Andersen wrote: >Note that whitelisting from 'root' is probably a bad idea: > >593 eep:spam/raw> grep -i "^From: .*root" * | wc > 19 56 841 > >weekly run output, however, is far safer: > >595 eep:spam/raw> grep -i 'weekly run' * | wc > 0 0 0 > > -Dave > C

RE: [SAtalk] Whitelist for Charlie Root

2002-03-17 Thread Mike Loiterman
estions? Mike Loiterman [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key 0xD1B9D18E >-Original Message- >From: David G. Andersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2002 1:06 AM >To: Mike Loiterman >Cc: 'CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson'; >[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtal

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist for Charlie Root

2002-03-16 Thread David G. Andersen
gt; >CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 4:33 PM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Whitelist for Charlie Root > > > >Just realized that you did not try: > > > >whitelist_from root > > > > >

RE: [SAtalk] Whitelist for Charlie Root

2002-03-16 Thread Mike Loiterman
Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >> Mike Loiterman >> Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 4:43 PM >> To: 'CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson'; >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Whitelist for Charlie R

RE: [SAtalk] Whitelist for Charlie Root

2002-03-16 Thread CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
> Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 4:43 PM > To: 'CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson'; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Whitelist for Charlie Root > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Ugh...its still isn't working. I paste

RE: [SAtalk] Whitelist for Charlie Root

2002-03-16 Thread Mike Loiterman
L PROTECTED] >[mailto:spamassassin-talk- [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of >Mike Loiterman >Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 3:43 PM >To: 'CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson'; >[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SAtalk] >Whitelist for Charlie Root > > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-

RE: [SAtalk] Whitelist for Charlie Root

2002-03-16 Thread Mike Loiterman
n Razor, see http://razor.sourceforge.net/ >> * 0.2 -- From and To the same address >> * -0.8 -- AWL: Auto-whitelist adjustment >> >> This is driving me nuts. Any help would be appreciated. >> >> >> Mike Loiterman >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>

RE: [SAtalk] Whitelist for Charlie Root

2002-03-16 Thread CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
s Charlie Root score CHARLIE_ROOT -100.0 Now it will get thru. --- Ed. > -Original Message- > From: Mike Loiterman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 2:03 PM > To: 'CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson'; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

RE: [SAtalk] Whitelist for Charlie Root

2002-03-16 Thread Mike Loiterman
>== >Ed. > >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >> Mike Loiterman >> Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 7:41 AM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: [SAtalk] Whitelist for Charlie Root >

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist for Charlie Root

2002-03-16 Thread Thomas Hurst
* Mike Loiterman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > My weekly reports from my server are getting tagged as SPAM. How > can I effectively whitelist this without opening up a hole in my > defenses..?? Unless you're using SpamAssassin to do delivery, filter them out before you pass through spamassassin.

RE: [SAtalk] Whitelist for Charlie Root

2002-03-16 Thread CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike > Loiterman > Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 7:41 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] Whitelist for Charlie Root > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > My weekly reports from my server are gettin

[SAtalk] Whitelist for Charlie Root

2002-03-16 Thread Mike Loiterman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 My weekly reports from my server are getting tagged as SPAM. How can I effectively whitelist this without opening up a hole in my defenses..?? From: Charlie Root Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 4:25 AM To: root Subject: fat_man.ascendency.net wee