Is SA supposed to always insert a X-Spam-Status tag?
I just started using SA + Postfix + amavisd-new and it seems to me that
SA does not insert this tag into non-spam messages. Is this correct?
The reason I am asking is that I received few email messages that were
very obviously spam emails but
* Avi Schwartz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 09 20, 02 at 23:57:
> Is SA supposed to always insert a X-Spam-Status tag?
>
> I just started using SA + Postfix + amavisd-new and it seems to me that
> SA does not insert this tag into non-spam messages. Is this correct?
Correct. Amavisd-new on
I have "X-Spam-Status" in every message that SA scans.
On 20 Sep 2002, Avi Schwartz wrote:
> Is SA supposed to always insert a X-Spam-Status tag?
>
> I just started using SA + Postfix + amavisd-new and it seems to me that
> SA does not insert this tag into non-spam messages. Is this correct?
>
Aaahhh...oops...i'm not running through Amavis. Please ignore my last
reply.
On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, Mike Leone wrote:
> * Avi Schwartz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 09 20, 02 at 23:57:
> > Is SA supposed to always insert a X-Spam-Status tag?
> >
> > I just started using SA + Postfix + amav
* Mike Burger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 09 21, 02 at 00:50:
> I have "X-Spam-Status" in every message that SA scans.
SA scanning is different than when Amavisd-new calls SA modules to spam
scan. Amavisd-new does not call all SA modules, such as adding the
X-Spam-Status header for all ema
