Re: [SAtalk] thank you guys

2004-01-29 Thread Matt Kettler
At 10:22 AM 1/23/2004, JRiley wrote: HolyMoly...69.27 seconds?! How'd you port SpamAssassin to run on a Commodore Vic-20? Something tells me that most of that time is likely due a couple of network tests that are timing out for _every_ email. ie: he might have DCC installed, but not allow the

RE: [SAtalk] thank you guys: DEBUG attached

2004-01-28 Thread Gary Smith
message (-4.6/4.5) for filter:120 in 2.0 seconds, 44790 bytes. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Kinghorn Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 1:13 AM To: 'Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)' Subject: RE: [SAtalk] thank you guys: DEBUG attached Hi

RE: [SAtalk] thank you guys: DEBUG attached

2004-01-28 Thread Thomas Kinghorn
: Spamassassin List Subject: Re: [SAtalk] thank you guys Most likely network tests are all timing out on him. Run spamd -D and it will tell you if and which ones are timing out. Martin Hepworth wrote: I get about 4 seconds per message on a Celeron 600 512MB ram with about

Re: [SAtalk] thank you guys: DEBUG attached

2004-01-28 Thread Martin Hepworth
Thomas Kinghorn wrote: Hi Guys. I have attached the contents on spamd -D. I have no idea as to why the scan time is so high. The other, identical server, runs at about 4 seconds... Thanks to all. Tom snip debug: RBL: success for 18 of 19 queries debug: RBL: timeout for relay after 2

Re: [SAtalk] thank you guys

2004-01-26 Thread Tim B
HolyMoly...69.27 seconds?! How'd you port SpamAssassin to run on a Commodore Vic-20? -JR BAHAHA... that ALMOST got me to spew coffee out my nose. --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools

RE: [SAtalk] thank you guys: DEBUG attached

2004-01-26 Thread Thomas Kinghorn
: Spamassassin List Subject: Re: [SAtalk] thank you guys Most likely network tests are all timing out on him. Run spamd -D and it will tell you if and which ones are timing out. Martin Hepworth wrote: I get about 4 seconds per message on a Celeron 600 512MB ram with about

RE: [SAtalk] thank you guys

2004-01-23 Thread Covington, Chris
AM To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) Subject: [SAtalk] thank you guys To all the contributors of SPAMASSASSIN, exiscan sa-exim... Thank you all here are some stats for the last 4 weeks This is for 4 domains. Total number of emails processed by the spam filter : 200942 Number of spams

RE: [SAtalk] thank you guys

2004-01-23 Thread Tom Meunier
: [SAtalk] thank you guys To all the contributors of SPAMASSASSIN, exiscan sa-exim... Thank you all here are some stats for the last 4 weeks This is for 4 domains. Total number of emails processed by the spam filter : 200942 Number of spams : 91592 ( 45.58%) Number

Re: [SAtalk] thank you guys

2004-01-23 Thread JRiley
snip Total number of emails processed by the spam filter : 200942 Number of spams : 91592 ( 45.58%) Number of clean messages:109350 ( 54.42%) Average message analysis time : 69.27 seconds Average spam analysis time :

Re: [SAtalk] thank you guys

2004-01-23 Thread Martin Hepworth
Logic Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Kinghorn Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 4:32 AM To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) Subject: [SAtalk] thank you guys To all the contributors of SPAMASSASSIN, exiscan sa-exim

Re: [SAtalk] thank you guys

2004-01-23 Thread JRiley
snip Something tells me that most of that time is likely due a couple of network tests that are timing out for _every_ email. ie: he might have DCC installed, but not allow the UDP packets past the firewall, which would add 10 seconds to every email (by default, more if he upped the timeout