On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 22:11, Jay Levitt wrote:
One problem: If a spamassassin --lint fails (because if you, oh, had
outdated directives in your sa-mimedefang.cf file), then once you correct
that, on the next run, rules_du_jour won't update anything, because it
thinks everything is up to date.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Thielen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jay Levitt [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 3:01 AM
Subject: Re: [WL] [SAtalk] Yikes.. rules_du_jour
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 22:11, Jay Levitt wrote:
One problem: If a spamassassin --lint
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Chris Thielen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 January 2004 14:17
To: Alan Munday
Subject: RE: [WL] [SAtalk] Yikes.. rules_du_jour
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 20:12, Alan Munday wrote:
Chris
Maybe the other way to do this is to have all
Hi,
Correct. The only set going through frequent revisions right now is
Chickenpox. I think I'm about to post a revision on Backhair/Popcorn,
but that will be the first change in months. Still, they will not go
i've found a major problem with blachhair set today: it catches most of
the
Hi,
Correct. The only set going through frequent revisions right now is
Chickenpox. I think I'm about to post a revision on
Backhair/Popcorn,
but that will be the first change in months. Still, they will not
go
i've found a major problem with blachhair set today: it catches most
of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Martin Radford [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Charles Gregory
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 6:02 PM
Subject: Re: [WL] [SAtalk] Yikes.. rules_du_jour
All, this message tried to address most of the comments made regarding
RulesDuJour so far
Hi,
Correct. The only set going through frequent revisions right now is
Chickenpox. I think I'm about to post a revision on Backhair/Popcorn,
but that will be the first change in months. Still, they will not go
i've found a major problem with blachhair set today: it catches most of
the
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
rules_du_jour is kind of neat, but I hope it's not going to drive up
Chris Jennifer's bandwidth bills or som 'em over a quota. :P
A thought, and a suggestion:
Thought: Some of the rules in 'rules du jour' look like they are fairly
'stable'. There
(Didn't mean to go offlist with my reply. Here it is again)
On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
rules_du_jour is kind of neat, but I hope it's not going to drive up
Chris Jennifer's bandwidth bills or som 'em over a quota. :P
A thought, and a suggestion:
Thought: Some of the
At Sun Jan 18 16:06:13 2004, Charles Gregory wrote:
A thought, and a suggestion:
Thought: Some of the rules in 'rules du jour' look like they are fairly
'stable'. There is no reason to be downloading 'backhair' or 'weeds'
everyday, is there?
Suggestion: For frequent changers, like
HTTP provides a straightforward way to avoid repeated
downloads of a file that hasn't changed, by sending
If-Modified-Since requests.
Unfortunately wget doesn't yet support this, though it is
mentioned in its TODO file. (This is with wget 1.9.1, which
is the current
version.)
At Sun Jan 18 20:41:08 2004, Scott Harris wrote:
HTTP provides a straightforward way to avoid repeated
downloads of a file that hasn't changed, by sending
If-Modified-Since requests.
Unfortunately wget doesn't yet support this, though it is
mentioned in its TODO file. (This is
My wget client checks for a newer file, or did I miss your point?
wget cheats. It issues a HEAD command, and checks the timestamp.
If it turns out that it needs the file, then it issues a
GET command for it.
This obviously saves downloading the file multiple times, but
it means
All, this message tried to address most of the comments made regarding
RulesDuJour so far.
On Sun, 2004-01-18 at 12:50, Martin Radford wrote:
At Sun Jan 18 16:06:13 2004, Charles Gregory wrote:
A thought, and a suggestion:
Thought: Some of the rules in 'rules du jour' look like they are
14 matches
Mail list logo
