[]
> I keep getting your emails for tech support on spambayes. Can you take
> me off your email response address?
Mailing lists are self-service - we don't add anyone, or take anyone
off, ourselves. At the bottom of every list email you get, there's a
link to unsubscribe yourself:
Info/Unsubscri
[Skip Montanaro]
> If we can't find someone with the time and inclination to dig into problems
> running SpamBayes in a Win7 64-bit+Outlook 2010 environment pretty soon, I
> think it might be time to think about closing up shop. Other than the
> occasional, "Help! I deleted my Junk Suspects folder
[Michael Kallay]
> I’d like to congratulate you on the quality of your product.
> I have donated in the past, and I will again in honor of this
> (next time I am connected to my corp network, so that
> Microsoft will match my gift)
>
> Yesterday a friend of mine sent me a chain letter (see
> below)
nd any help you can offer here. Tim
____
Tim Scott
e-mail: <mailto:t...@tscott.net> t...@tscott.net
___
SpamBayes@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes
Info/Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailm
[elaineschub...@aol.com]
> I have AOL and downloaded SpamBayes 1.1 a4.tar -- When I was downloading, I
> had used the category for AOL users and it said something to the effect they
> could not do that and instead another category downloaded.
Sounds to me like you use Windows, in which case downlo
[Timberwolf Creek]
> I've used SpamBayes V 1.0.4 with Outlook for several years now, and it works
> flawlessly. Thank you, thank you, thank you. However, since upgrading my
> MS Office to 2007 (meaning I am using Outlook 2007) it drives me nuts that I
> am constantly being notified, via the task
[Alan]
> I am receiving emails addressed to your organization with my address hooked
> onto it and I am getting sick of them.
>
> My SpamBayes doesn’t pick them up because they com from different address
> and anyway I don’t want them as I am sure they will only grow in number as
> time goes on.
>
[James Calfee]
>>> I see you have a popular project on Sourceforge. I have a similar
>>> dis-taste for SPAM (don't we all), so I have made a considerable
>>> investment by writing a SPAM complaint program.
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Please have a look, the web site is http://spamcomplaint.net ...
[Thoma
[Gene Mannacio]
> As a measure of the effectiveness of your product, or rather the lack
> thereof, please be advised that this automated reply to my prior e-mail
> ended up in my junk suspects file. That would be good advertising, don't
> you think? "So, effective we filter out our own messages t
rsion of Windows you are using: XP 2002
* the version of SpamBayes: Binary Version 1.0.4 (2005)
* any log files - what's this?
* MS Office Professional 2007
What do I need to do to get it to work again?
Thanks.
Tim Somers
550 Madison Street
Winfield, IL 6019
With Outlook 2002, SpamBayes automatically started filtering messages when
Outlook was opened. When I open Outlook 2003, I must use the Filter
Messages option once to perform this task manually before automatic
filtering is enabled.
Does anyone have an idea how to get SpamBayes to start filterin
[Eagle Accounting]
> HOW CAN I RETRIEVE SOMETHING I ACCIDENTALLY DELETED?
SpamBayes never deletes email, so your question is about how to use
your email program. If you're using Outlook, look in Outlook's
"Deleted Items" folder. If you don't know what that means, try asking
a coworker who uses O
mailboxes are hosted on Exchange 2003.
Can you provider any guidance on this issue? I have read the various
support documents, but I am unsure if it is just something I'm doing
wrong or if this is a bug. Any suggestion would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Sincerely,
Kernel Softwar
mailboxes are hosted on Exchange 2003.
Can you provider any guidance on this issue? Any suggestion would be
greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Sincerely,
Kernel Software, Inc.
Tim Sagstetter
___
SpamBayes@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailma
[Moty Koppes]
> I am truly disappointed to find the email I sent you regarding my problems
> with your software under my name in Google.
Sorry, but as it says at the top of:
http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/contact.html
There are currently five mailing lists of interest. All lists are
pu
[Brendon Whateley]
> I've just started using spambayes again after a while away from it.
> Now, 3 days in, I notice that I've trained on far more spam than ham.
> (Total emails trained: Spam: *432* Ham: *64) I seem to remember that
> this was previously my experience in the past.
>
> My question i
[Mark Hammond]
> ...
> See above - once you can demonstrate the problem is indeed
> deterministic and caused by spambayes, I'll be happy to look at ways
> to prevent spambayes doing it.
Chuck, if this isn't clear, the developers don't know what you're
talking about ;-), but would be happy to pursu
[John F. DuPriest]
> Arjan:
>
>
>
> I found a message you wrote in July 2005;
>
>
>
> "Hi, I get this Error message every email I receive. HELP!
> Siffed through the faq and bugs couldnot find the answer there
> Included part of the report generated bij mickeysoft!1
> AppName: sispamfilterengine.ex
) is not around anymore. I have to track down that file to get a
scripting environment set-up on my computer (I guess...I'm new to
this)so, if you happen to stil have that file laying around on some
corner of the hard drivewould you please email it to me?
Thanks!
Tim Ga
iirc, the problem with incredimail was, at least at one time, that it
doesn't expose the functions necessary to redirect the client to
localhost. If it did that, then their prog would be able to client any
pop3 account, and they didn't want to be in that business. Maybe that's
changed, but th
[Alexander Kalman]
> Dear Sir, I would like to Download SpamBayes 1.0.4 (courtesy of PCUser
> magazine) in Sydney Australia but I am not with Optusnet but Telstra
> Bigpond Cable.
> Can I specify the Optusnet Mirror ? as there is no Telstra or Bigpond
> mentioned on your download page for Sydney.
Are you using Outlook, or a pop3 email account?
David Norcross wrote:
> Hello
>
>
>
> I have just downloaded spambayes and I am ready to begin
> configuration. I have multiple email accounts coming into my email
> client. I have searched through the site and cannot find the
> instructions fo
One thing to keep in mind when compiling with PIL using distutils, is
that PIL does dynamic inclusion, so you will get runtime errors on the
compiled executable. You have to code the include for the image types
you support, like:
import BmpImagePlugin
import JpegImagePlugin
Peter Barker wro
It will work just fine, you'll use the pop3proxy setup. However, the
thunderbird mailer has a spam filter built in that's based on the
spambayes filtering scheme. I use thunderbird and it works very well
for me. Just right click on mails and select "mark as junk" or "mark as
not junk" and mi
Spambayes is an open source project, written and maintained by
volunteers. Donations are certainly appreciated, but not required by
any means.
There may very well be products that work in concert with Exchange, but
ours is not one of them. Philosophically, we assert that the definition
of wh
To my knowledge, there's no way to get spambayes to work with Incredimail.
mel c wrote:
> Hello, I have loaded Spambayes onto my X P and use Incredimail Premium
> for all mail. I have reads the trouble shooter and have entered
> localhost in the incoming bow etc. Whatever I try Spambaye remains
Thunderbird is Mozilla's pop3 client. It has a builtin spam filtering
feature that's based on Spambayes. The Mozilla dudes used our codebase,
and reimplemented it in the base language for the browser, which is C, I
presume. I use the builtin feature with great results.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrot
[Tim Stone]
> I've got a bit of experience with the PIL, if I get a few spare minutes,
> maybe I'll mess with something. Can someone send me a typical spam
> image?
I just forwarded to you the most recent pump-&-dump scam I trained on.
The pitch is in a GIF displaying co
I've got a bit of experience with the PIL, if I get a few spare minutes,
maybe I'll mess with something. Can someone send me a typical spam
image? I don't seem to get them, ever.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Peter> For my spam and non-spam, a good indicator is that I very seldom
>Peter>
ould think that in a spam image the histogram would be much more spikey
with only a few rgb value counts above some percentage of the of the
total pixels in the picture.
Tim Peters wrote:
>[Alan Arndt]
>
>
>>Over the past month or more I have noticed a large increase in the amount
[Alan Arndt]
> Over the past month or more I have noticed a large increase in the amount of
> spam I receive with the Spam text translated into images. The actual text
> of the message is benign gibberish designed to pass Bayesian filters. They
> have even taken the step of inserting random bits
list LOL. Fortunately, I'm not a spammer. And the Spambayes project
has nothing to do with SpamFighter. You probably need to contact them
directly. Their site is www.spamfighter.com.
Tim Peters wrote:
>[Graeme/Deb]
>
>
>>I installed SPAMfighter a few days ago.
>>
>
[Graeme/Deb]
> I installed SPAMfighter a few days ago.
>
> The system did not block or blacklist emails from entering my inbox (OE).
>
> Worse, I got a flood of spam. It seems your system is a target for spammers,
> like a light is to moths!
>
> Or is this some sort of scam?!!
>
> I would like some
Continue to "recover from spam" messages from that source until
spambayes learns that this mail is not spam.
Douglas Winton (Spearhead) wrote:
> spambayes is deleting an email from a good source. How do I correct this?
> Regards
> Douglas
>
>--
It does not specifically work with either of those two products,
although gmail does have a pop3 interface that spambayes could be used
with. Gmail, however, has considerable spam filtering built in, and
most users find their filtering to be adequate. Where spambayes
differentiates itself is
[yahoo.de]
> I believe that spambayes has no functionality to search in attachmennts?
> I send an attachment with spam content and i see in spam clue, that there is
> no Token from the attachhment and the email is classified as ham!!!?
While some details depend in part on which version of SB you'r
Nothing is 100% true, but in this case, Tim's as close as you can get.
Amedee Van Gasse wrote:
>On Fri, June 16, 2006 5:07, Tim Peters said:
>
>
>>You know where you live, but the mirrors don't know where you live, so
>>they can't make that choice for you
[Okulitch, Andrew]
> I requested a download. I was asked to select a mirror. I have no idea
> what this is or why I need to do this.
"A mirror" is a machine on which a copy of the software lives. The
software lives on many mirrors. In theory, it would be nice if you
picked a mirror that's geogr
send me :)
> ??
There is no such documentation, although as Tim Stone said:
Even if you're not a programmer, the comments are quite readable.
So try that. Feel free to ask questions if you get stuck. That _has_
to work better than continuing to ask for something that doesn't exist
In this instance, the system is fairly well self-documented. There are
extensive comments in the code, including a fairly detailed explanation
of the tokenization scheme. I'd suggest that you check out the source
files and look at them. Even if you're not a programmer, the comments
are quite
As the Open Source adage goes... you itch, you scratch Who
itches enough to implement this? IIRC, we had a long discussion about
this a long time ago, and decided that if enough image spam were being
misclassified, we might take a look at it this idea. I don't have
enough misclassifications
[Amedee Van Gasse]
> Uhhh... I have been subscribed for a few months now, and it's teh first
> time I get this annoying autoreply.
> Did something go wrong on the listserver?
The Mailman software happens to send this in response the first time
someone posts, and every 90 days thereafter if they co
PS: please don't do "reply all", reply to the list.
The problem here is if the sender is not subscribed, they'll never get the
response. If you respond to the sender only, then the list doesn't see the
response... Sorry, but reply-all is the solution. If you dig back about three
years in
I'm not sure why this would be the first time, unless this is the first
time you've forwarded to the list rather than replied, or your spam
filter for some reason didn't recognize the autoreply this time .
It may be an annoying autoreply for some of us, but who knows how many
untold billions o
[digital tuning, inc.]
> ...
> Is there any way to get spambayes to process emails before outlook runs it's
> rule list??
Sorry, no way that we know of. Left to its own devices, Outlook
appears to _interleave_ running its own rules with SpamBayes, so that
you can't predict much of anything, and t
[Gary Smith]
> It's spam alright. The first one tells Jennifer to go to Apolo beach in
> Florida
> but the message was sent from Amsterdam.
>
> This message was "from" someone saying the email was from Alltel.net but it
> was from the same server in Amsterdam. ( server 194.109.24.25 )
All add
No kidding. I seriously doubt that Jennifer Aniston wants to go to 756
Flamingo Drive to chill out... LOL
Tony Meyer wrote:
>On 28/05/2006, at 5:37 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
>>I do not have a question for Miss Aniston, but a lot of good things
>>to compliment her on.
>>
>>Friends:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I've switched from anydbm to ZODB for my SpamBayes database file. Just to
> confirm, I can read and write simultaneously, correct? I'm going back to
> using sb_mboxtrain for training and using sb_bnfilter for scoring should
> that make a difference. I'd like to make sure the
Believe me, if you read back through the archives in... 2003?... the
training debate went on ad-infinitum.
I think the original question though, was "I want to train ham as ham
and I don't know how to do that easily." I can't answer that question,
cause I don't use Outlook (on purpose). Maybe s
Spambayes operates on a the basis of statistics. It's keeps track of
words that have appeared in mails you've told it as spam, and based on
the frequency both of the occurrance of those words in mail you've told
it as spam, and the frequency of those words occurring in a particular
mail that's
[Tim]
>> That too: ZODB uses Python pickles to store object state, and
>> inherits platform-independence from that. ZODB's FileStorage format
>> is also platform-independent. If we're using "I" flavors of ZODB
>> BTrees,
[Tony]
> I don't
[Jason Ahrens]
>> The only problem program at this point is Spambayes. The database
>> is not compatible between 32bit and 64bit systems.
>>
>> I don't suppose anyone has found a way to use spambayes between 32
>> and 64 bit systems?
[Tony Meyer]
> What database are you using? I'm 95% sure that p
I believe this is a thunderbird issue. It happens in my non-spambayes
installation that uses AVG antivirus. The "virus free" notification
gets added as an attachment rather than inline, as well. I don't think
there's anything that spambayes can do to alter this behavior.
Amedee Van Gasse wro
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Is the spambayes mailing list spamproof?
Nope, not at all. Because spam is routinely discussed here, and
samples of spam routinely posted here, "almost all" of python.org's
content-based anti-spam gimmicks are intentionally disabled for the
SpamBayes lists. In addition, this
What is the serious pop3proxy bug? Is it in the bug reports?
Bill Hely wrote:
>TONY MEYER SAID:
>
>
>>>Uninstalled SB 1.0.4 which I could not get to work.
>>>
>>>
>Installed
>
>
>>>1.1a1 per your FAQ 4.21 setup for Outlook Express.
>>>
>>>
>>No! The POP3 proxy (what you use for
[David Gillbanks]
> Thanks for your reply, Tony.
>
> The thing is, graphics/pics in HTML e-mails were displaying perfectly
> well in my Outlook until I enabled Spambayes. So naturally I assumed it
> was Spambayes stripping them out.
Proximity doesn't imply causality ;-)
> I've since disabled Spam
If I recall correctly, we've had several discussions about Incredimail
and determined that there's not much that Spambayes can do to help the
spam situation for users of that mail system.
Tom Milligan wrote:
> Is there a way to make the program send the spam and unsure items
> anywhere except
Nope. While that would be a rather simple program to write, that's not
the one we wrote...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi,
>Someone directed me to your group in the hopes of solving my problem.
>I want a cell phone user to send an email to me, containing only one
>character in the body. Based o
Outlook Web Access is built in a completely different way than Outlook,
and does not programs like Spambayes any point at which spam filtering
could possibly occur. Unfortunately, when you use OWA, you're going to
see the spam.
Dill Sharon A Ctr SRS wrote:
>
> > Thanks so much for creating th
The pop3proxy uses the same filtering as all of the other spambayes
interfaces. There is no difference there.
There is no function at this point to always flag a unique sequence of
characters as non-spam. Presuming that the unique sequence of
characters occurs only in ham for you, and you tra
You can unsubscribe yourself by visiting
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes. Nobody else can
unsubscribe you, for obvious reasons ;)
Oliver Marshall wrote:
>So long all. I have moved to a server side antispam package now, and am
>wanting to sign off the spambayes list.
>
>Can an
Spambayes does not keep lists of addresses that have been "declared" to
be spammer addresses. I suspect having classified your friend's email
as spam will have done little harm. Simply continue training ham and
spam as you would and all will be well.
Van Wade-Day wrote:
> I have tried to fin
Did you download the version of Spambayes that you were installing from
spambayes.sourceforge.net? If not, please do so and try again. I
suspect that the version you got had been corrupted.
Bernie Dwyer wrote:
>Hi - I was attempting to install SpamBayes 1.04 from the current Australian
>PCUse
Unfortunately, this translation is not available. If you would like to
contribute this translation to the project, that would be great!
Zhenya wrote:
>Здравствуйте, spambayes.
>
>Dear friends!
>I address you from Ukraine! I am very interested in your programme but
>for better understanding of i
The message in your log is normal, and indicates that you haven't
installed the spambayes server as a windows service. Provided
everything is working as you expect, there shouldn't be any reason to
worry about that message.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I am using SpamBayes POP3 Proxy Version 1.0
[bob posert]
> Spambayes is great; I love it; can't say enough good things. I was going
> crazy with > 100 spams per day and this has saved my sanity. My family
> thanks you too - I'm in a much better mood now!
It is a lot better than suicide ;-)
> I wonder if you have any ideas on how to deal
[Coe, Bob]
> Can someone with a knowledge of the plugin code tell me whether it violates
> the modern fad of scrupulously avoiding the execution of data? Old-time
> coders like me used to do it all the time. (You can get away with it even in
> recursive and reentrant programs if you're careful.) Bu
[Coe, Bob]
> That's a bit like letting the gas out of a helium balloon and then asking
> the Weather Channel to help you get it back. But one thing puzzles me: If Ms
> [OP's name] was already embarrassed that the original message put her name
> into
> the public domain, why did her subsequent plea
> Hi I just did a google search of my full name, and this came up.
> ...
> Would you please remove my last name from this message or any other
> messages I've posted.
I'm sorry, but we have no more ability to alter public archives than
you have. As it says:
http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/c
[Karen Kreps]
> Sorry, no sooner did I send this request for help but I solved the problem
> myself, using this guidance from the help files.
Very good! I especially appreciate that this message arrived two
minutes _before_ your original message -- if that's a repeatable
skill, they don't pay you
That's actually a bit of a complex question you're asking ;) but the
short answer is: no. It does no harm to train on correctly classified
messages.
Monte wrote:
>I've been running SpamBayes for a couple days now, it's getting better
>pretty fast. Does it do anygood to "train" on messages t
Does the userid you're logged on to windows as have administrator
permission?
Harry P Begier Jr wrote:
> > This is what is in outlook_addin.register.exe,log:
> >
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File "addin.py", line 72, in ?
> > IOError: [Errno 13] Permission denied:
> > 'C:\\DOCUME
Interesting. Yes, Thunderbird does seem to be too smart for our own
good in this instance. Thanks for the heads up.
Monte wrote:
>I got it working, set the server to "localhost", set username to
>"username" and it works.
>
>Here's something I ran into. I've got 3 email addresses I get with
There's not enough information here to indicate you have a Spambayes
related problem. Please provide some evidence that Spambayes is causing
this problem, as it normally does nothing with outgoing mail, and this
seems to be caused by a malformed email address.
glehmuth wrote:
>I'm getting thi
Forwarding my response to you :)
Tim Stone wrote:
>This is possible if you are the administrator of the mail server, and
>you wish to impose your definition of exactly what is spam on everyone
>who uses your mail server. As a user of someone else's mail server, it
>is not po
This should help you:
http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#does-spambayes-work-with-outlook-express
Christine Polk wrote:
> My e-mail comes over broadband, but the computer is connected with
> wireless. The emails aren't being filtered. I think I'm supposed to
> tell it somewhere how to
This is possible if you are the administrator of the mail server, and
you wish to impose your definition of exactly what is spam on everyone
who uses your mail server. As a user of someone else's mail server, it
is not possible to do that.
You may be able to configure your mail client to not a
[avw]
> How do I unsubscribe from the mailing list. I am going on holiday and need
> to conserve all my in box for needed email.
Go to
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes
and change your delivery options to whatever you like. Note that it's
also possible there to suspend deliv
I'm sorry, but it isn't clear to me what question you're asking. 110 is
the standard pop3 port, and 25 is the standard smtp port. Does that
answer your question?
Harry Sigerson wrote:
>Dear Mailing list,
> I may be blaming NAV2006 (which I recently upgraded to) for this
>next when it is
Assuming you're using Outlook Express, this url should help:
http://spambayes.sourceforge.net/faq.html#how-do-i-set-up-spambayes-and-outlook-express
If you're using another email client, the instruction details will vary
slightly, but the idea is there. You tell your email client to retrieve
m
Now -that's- the kind of report we like to hear! Thanks, Mike.
Mike Jackson wrote:
> I noticed that my install of SpamBayes wasn't working - so I found the
> troubleshooting guide and used the steps under "Toolbar items appear,
> but fail to work," and it solved my problem immediately. thanks!
If Incredimail can be configured to retrieve pop3 mail from any pop3
server, then yes. If I recall correctly, though, this is not the case
with Incredimail. I believe it is "hard-wired" to retrieve mail from
Incredimail's servers only. If this is the case, then spambayes will
not work for yo
To get the spambayes proxy to work correctly, you'll need to configure
Eudora to get its mail from the proxy. Eudora will use localhost as its
mail server, and a port that you chose. We suggest either 110 or 8110.
Put this port number into Eudora. Then bring up the spambayes pop3proxy
config
[douglas cohn]
> ... as well as extending the lag between the time Spambayes kicks in before
> it allows Outlook filtering to work.
BTW, that's backwards. Outlook doesn't give us any direct control
over when SpamBayes runs versus Outlook's own rules, and it's
impossible for SpamBayes to stop (or
[douglas cohn]
> For the life of me I do not understand what I need to do to prevent messages
> with a score of 0% from going into my Junkmail folder. ...
I don't believe SpamBayes is moving these messages into your Junkmail
folder to begin with. There's nothing in the log file saying that
SpamBa
There is a configuration step you have to run, it should be in the
instructions. You open a browser and go to http://localhost:8880 . That
will bring up some a config panel that you'll need to put your pop3
server name, port, and some other stuff. It's loaded with plenty of
help text, so you
he problem but have not found any information about a solution to the
problem.
Any ideas?
Regards,
Tim H.
___
SpamBayes@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes
Check the FAQ before asking: http://spambayes.sf.net/faq.html
[James Gilmour]
> I am extremely concerned to find detailed data about my computer on your
> mail archive.
>
> Please delete this information ASAP, especially the first file, which in my
> opinion, should NEVER have been posted on a publicly accessible website.
>
> Please confirm when these deletio
[Tennessee Leeuwenburg]
> Could the list admin please remove me? Maybe I'm being dense, but I
> can't find the unsubscribe instructions.
Go to:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/spambayes
and look for:
To unsubscribe from SpamBayes, get a password reminder, or
change your subs
[Erik Brown]
>> How did SpamBayes perform in the TREC 2005 testing? Do you have any
>> numbers?
[Tony Meyer]
> For a start, you can see the information here:
> http://plg.uwaterloo.ca/~gvcormac/trecspamtrack05/
Lots of info, but kinda dry ;-)
> At some point during the registration process TREC
I presume you mean Windows XP Media Center Edition? What version of
Outlook are you now running?
Sharon Frischling wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I love SpamBayes! It worked great on my old computer running Windows
> XP. However, I installed it on our new machine that is running Windows
> VP Media Center
[Mark Hammond]
> ...
> I keep hearing rumours of COM related errors with Python 2.4. While bug
> http://www.python.org/sf/1163244 remains alive I don't quite trust 2.4 -
> although I thought pywin32 worked around the bug it apparently doesn't do so
> in all cases.
I suspect bug 1163244 should be
[Coe, Bob]
> I was all set to ignore this whiner totally, but something in your reply
> puzzles me a little: If you can't subscribe other people to the list,
> how could someone have subscribed a corporate email address? (I'm
> assuming you meant a corporate mailing list of which Mr Garrison is a
>
[Kerry Garrison]
> UNSUBSCRIBE
>
> PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD TAKE ME OFF THIS IMPOSSIBLE TO
> GET OFF OF LIST!!!
I checked, and [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not subscribed to this list.
You're not getting messages from this list from us, at least not to
that address. Is it possible you subscribed using
[Lisa Pankow]
> I am currently dealing with an internet stalker and would VERY much
> appreciate it if you can take down my information in the links below:
I'm sorry, but as you've discovered, public mailing lists get
duplicated all over the world. In general nothing can be done to
remove message
[Jesse Pelton]
> Yuck. Don't wanna go there.
>
> I'm pretty sure I've seen discussion on the list of a training regimen
> that involved discarding aged messages (you could even have been
> involved),
Testing frameworks hold on to all messages for as long as a test is
running, and store whatever m
[Jesse Pelton]
> ...
> Developers: would it be feasible and sensible to add UI to allow users to
> remove messages older than a user-specified cutoff? If so, I'll log a
> feature request.
The database doesn't hold training messages, it only contains
statistics computed from the union of tokens se
[Martin Leinneweber]
> I want to remove Spam bites as it is taking emails that I want God knows
> where, and leaving the spasm. Tell me how to remove it, I don't want to fix
> it, I want it off now.
You didn't say which version of SpamBayes you're using. Since you
appear to have used Outlook to
[Finkbeiner, Karin (KR)]
|> We have some questions regarding using your SpamBayes Anti-span
> Client software.
SpamBayes comes in several versions, and I don't know which one you're
thinking about here.
> Can you confirm if there are any Export Restrictions for this software?
Not that we know of
[Tim Peters]
>> A way to get what you want is turn this into a moderated
>> list, with all postings held for moderator review. ...
[Herb Martin]
> I was (of course) mostly just venting and offering a
> hint to others that this referenced message was "just
> another phi
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
