Re: [spamdyke-users] My logfile parser (Script)

2009-02-27 Thread Otto Berger
you could also use fail2ban for that. You just have to specify a custom rule (filter) for the spamdyke-log output. Then the sender ip will be released after a specified timeframe and not blocked forever ;). (IMHO it is still not a very good idea to block by firewall) Otto Sebastian Grewe

[spamdyke-users] spam analysis

2009-02-27 Thread Kulkarni Shantanu
Hi, i am happily using spamdyke on few of my mail servers. i have put a small page on comparison of some easy spam blocking ways. please do check it out at, http://www.shantanukulkarni.org/spam_analysis.html Shantanu -- ___ spamdyke-users mailing

Re: [spamdyke-users] spam analysis

2009-02-27 Thread Joe Canner
I'm not a big fan of UCEProtect right now, as their list blocks our outgoing mail because our ISP is associated with large amounts of spam. This methodology, while no doubt effective at blocking spam, must generate a lot of false positives because of this guilt by association philosophy. Our ISP

Re: [spamdyke-users] spam analysis

2009-02-27 Thread Kulkarni Shantanu
yes, but i use their level 1 protection. level 2 3 are indeed aggressive. but i am also of the opinion that isps are partly responsible for their clients using their bandwidth to spam and they should blacklist these customers and take legal action against them. Shantanu -- * Joe Canner

Re: [spamdyke-users] spam analysis

2009-02-27 Thread Joe Canner
Yes, Level 1 protection seems reasonable. We passed level 1 but failed level 2 and 3 because of other clients using our ISP. I've only had one recipient so far block us because of this, but I fear this might be just the beginning. I agree that ISPs should take some responsibility for their

Re: [spamdyke-users] spam analysis

2009-02-27 Thread Eric Shubert
A possible solution to this problem is to bring your mail server in-house, and/or use an affordable outbound mail service such as DynDNS's Mailhop Outbound. If you don't have a static IP address in-house, DynDNS's CustomDNS service solves that problem affordably. Disclaimer: I'm not associated

Re: [spamdyke-users] My logfile parser (Script)

2009-02-27 Thread Sebastian Grewe
I totally forgot about that - but I am not using the script to block them forever, just to monitor qmail when a large amount of connections is coming in (which happens ever so often). Even so I did turn off the blocking feature since qmail handles it just fine and connections clear up after a

Re: [spamdyke-users] My logfile parser (Script)

2009-02-27 Thread Eric Shubert
Sorry to say that I haven't had a chance to check out your script yet, Sebastian. :( Speaking of colored and filtered qmail logfiles though, there's a nice 'qmlog' script at qtp.qmailtoaster.com (part of the qmailtoaster-plus package). It allows easy viewing and searching of qmail (et al)

Re: [spamdyke-users] spam analysis

2009-02-27 Thread Joe Canner
We actually have a block of static IPs, so that is not our problem. I suspect our ISP uses the same Class B network that we are on to also provide dynamic IP addresses to residential customers. There may also be commercial customers with static IPs engaged in spamming for all I know.

Re: [spamdyke-users] My logfile parser (Script)

2009-02-27 Thread Sebastian Grewe
Hey Eric, As I undestand it qmlog is just a tool to find a specific logfile entry if you are looking for certain times where a connection has been made. My script is just checking for spamdyke output, and only specific output at that. I also am using a while loop to read the lines in instead of

Re: [spamdyke-users] spam analysis

2009-02-27 Thread Joe Canner
Sorry, I ignored the first part of your post. Our mail server is already in-house with a static IP. However, the outbound mail service idea may be a useful way to approach this problem. If it gets worse and the ISP doesn't do anything about it, that may be worth investigating. -Original

Re: [spamdyke-users] spam analysis

2009-02-27 Thread Eric Shubert
I've found that using DynDNS services along with a regular dynamic address is more affordable than going the static IP route (no pun intended). Such a service level is adequate for most SMBs, but not appropriate for mission critial environments. Joe Canner wrote: Sorry, I ignored the first

Re: [spamdyke-users] My logfile parser (Script)

2009-02-27 Thread Sebastian Grewe
After checking out the code in that script I think it might be easier for me to just start on my script and extend it's functionality to look for all lines in those logfiles instead of just spamdyke. I will see what I can do. Cheers, Sebastian Eric Shubert wrote: Sorry to say that I haven't

Re: [spamdyke-users] My logfile parser (Script)

2009-02-27 Thread Eric Shubert
Thanks. I'm sure you'll keep us posted! :) Sebastian Grewe wrote: After checking out the code in that script I think it might be easier for me to just start on my script and extend it's functionality to look for all lines in those logfiles instead of just spamdyke. I will see what I can do.

Re: [spamdyke-users] My logfile parser (Script)

2009-02-27 Thread Sebastian Grewe
Sure will, so here we go. Attached a modified qmlog script that can be run with the -c option to add colored output for most log entries in Qmail Toaster. If something is missing or doesn't match correctly it will have the FIXME tag before the line. When running in color mode less output will