That's very unusual, it sounds like a setting on their server. It's been a
long time, but I remember a setting on old sendmail servers that would send an
"advisory message" if an email had been sitting in the queue too long. It was
just a "by the way" notice (and it always confused every user
A client using our Spamdyke-enabled mail server has reported someone sending
them an email received a "bounce" message notifying the sender that the
messages has been graylisted (see the delivery failure notification below).
They did receive the message (graylisting works well for us).
This is
Thanks Sam!
I have been using this settings w/o problems in other box.
I have folders for all desired domains (thus the 'only' level), but
never used the other options.
Should it be tested in the --config-test?
I will create one of the other files and see what happens.
-Sergio
Sam Clippinger
Hi list,
I have a new QMToaster box that I cannot make graylisting work.
I run the spamdyke test and produced no errors.
I used this same config in other box and worked perfectly for a couple of
years.
The graylisting folder is in the same folder as the Maildirs, so i think
permissions are OK.
Maybe the graylist folder for each domain
2010/8/25 Sergio Minini (NETKEY) smin...@netkey.com.ar
Hi list,
I have a new QMToaster box that I cannot make graylisting work.
I run the spamdyke test and produced no errors.
I used this same config in other box and worked perfectly for a couple
The problem is your graylist-level option. You have it set to only
which requires two things: first you must create a folder for each
domain that should be graylisted, and second you must also use one (or
more) of the options graylist-exception-ip-entry,
graylist-exception-ip-file,
Well I think I might have my own answer to my question.
It *appears* as though the messages that weren't getting graylisted were sent
using tls.
On Aug 1, 2010, at 1:11 PM, Anthony Ercolano wrote:
Please pardon me, if this comes through twice...
I've been using spamdyke for 6 months or so
Quoting Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net:
Anthony Ercolano wrote:
Well I think I might have my own answer to my question.
It *appears* as though the messages that weren't getting graylisted were
sent using tls.
Very interesting. Upon what are you basing this observation?
It depends upon
t...@uncon.org wrote:
Quoting Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net:
Anthony Ercolano wrote:
Well I think I might have my own answer to my question.
It *appears* as though the messages that weren't getting graylisted were
sent using tls.
Very interesting. Upon what are you basing this
Please pardon me, if this comes through twice...
I've been using spamdyke for 6 months or so on my server without graylisting
and with no problems.
A few days ago I decided to add graylisting. It seems to be working fine.
However, it exhibits a behavior that is confusing me.
I use tmda on
Quoting Demetrio López demetrio.lo...@idecnet.com:
In my case, this behavior provokes that, if I receive a legitimate
email, all the SPAM that I receive from any IP with the same sender and
recipient will be accepted by the greylisting filter.
I understand that these is not desirable when
Hello. I have a problem with greylisting. When an email is accepted by the
sender sen...@domain-from.com to the recipient recipi...@domain-rcpt.com
from an IP then all mail sent to that same sender and recipient are accepted
from any IP.
Software:
Qmail-LDAP
Spamdyke 4.1.0 (from source)
Debian
I believe that behavior is normal. Will you please explain why you think
this is a problem?
Note, a successful gray listing isn't necessarily a whitelist. Other
filtering rules are still applied to subsequent messages, but if a
message from a 2nd IP address passes other filters, it will not
Using the IP address of the remote server causes a lot of problems for
large mail hosts. I about this here:
http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/FAQ.html#SUGGESTION9
-- Sam Clippinger
On 7/11/10 9:39 AM, Demetrio López wrote:
Hello. I have a problem with greylisting. When an email is
In my case, this behavior provokes that, if I receive a legitimate
email, all the SPAM that I receive from any IP with the same sender and
recipient will be accepted by the greylisting filter.
I understand that these is not desirable when receive mail from ISPs
with many outbound servers but
I cannot get it work. Look:
cat /var/log/qmail/smtp/current | spamdyke-stats
spamdyke-stats build 2008110408
Summary
Allowed:0 0.00%
Timeout:0 0.00%
Errors :0 0.00%
Denied :0 0.00%
Total :0 0.00%
On 16.04.2010
there is a spamdyke-stats script, but me myself I would like to know how
get it work/installed
On 16.04.2010 01:02, nightduke wrote:
how do you get those stats from spamdyke?
Thanks
2010/3/26t...@uncon.org:
Quoting Eric Shuberte...@shubes.net:
Wow, that's a bunch. How many
mail-archive's wrapping of the code made it unusable via a plain
copy-and-paste, so I cleaned it up manually. Here's a copy:
http://gist.github.com/368405
On 4/16/10 8:05 AM, t...@uncon.org wrote:
Quoting Istvan Köpe ist...@advancetech.ro:
there is a spamdyke-stats script, but me myself I
how do you get those stats from spamdyke?
Thanks
2010/3/26 t...@uncon.org:
Quoting Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net:
Wow, that's a bunch. How many domains?
7 domains.
As David's numbers show, if no pruning has ever been done, the % of old
(inactive) entries is quite high (96.6% in his
t...@uncon.org wrote:
Here's some stats:
1062951 59.03% DENIED_GRAYLISTED
565115 31.38% DENIED_LOCAL_FROM_TO
1529108.49% ALLOWED
108260.60% TIMEOUT
61420.34% DENIED_OTHER
24620.13% DENIED_TOO_MANY_RECIPIENTS
2460.01% ERROR
Quoting Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net:
t...@uncon.org wrote:
My mail servers graylisting was hitting filesystem limits in less than
24 hours.
Which limit(s) of which filesystem?
Number of directories within a directory, on ext3 (32k)
The qtp-prune-graylist script would take much longer
David Milholen wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
t...@uncon.org wrote:
Quoting Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net:
I think this is more complicated than it needs to be, and not any more
efficient than the qtp-prune-graylist script
David Milholen wrote:
I just a need a little primer to understand which method of graylisting
i need to use.
I have it set to always and those domain folders have are huge with
entries.
I am configuring a new server with qtp using centos5.4. All of the
installation went smooth.
I am
t...@uncon.org wrote:
Quoting David Milholen dmilho...@wletc.com:
I just a need a little primer to understand which method of graylisting
i need to use.
I just dont want those huge graylist entries lingering around.
Graylist pruning has always been a problem with spamdyke. You have a
Quoting Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net:
I think this is more complicated than it needs to be, and not any more
efficient than the qtp-prune-graylist script
(http://qtp.qmailtoaster.com/trac/browser/bin/qtp-prune-graylist). The
script is admittedly a little i/o intensive, but a) some of it is
t...@uncon.org wrote:
Quoting Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net:
I think this is more complicated than it needs to be, and not any more
efficient than the qtp-prune-graylist script
(http://qtp.qmailtoaster.com/trac/browser/bin/qtp-prune-graylist). The
script is admittedly a little i/o
|
| Which end is timing out the connection? You can use spamdyke's excellent
| detailed logging to find out. My guess is that the session times out
| before spam/virus scanning is complete. If that's the case, either tune
| up your scanning if possible (put working directory in tmpfs?) or
|
Greg Cirino wrote:
|
| Which end is timing out the connection? You can use spamdyke's excellent
| detailed logging to find out. My guess is that the session times out
| before spam/virus scanning is complete. If that's the case, either tune
| up your scanning if possible (put working
Hello,
Has anybody experienced issues when graylisting a domain and timeouts with
attachments (PDF files in my case)
Here is the scenario,
Remote users sends an email to a local domain user with a pdf attachment
The graylisting kicks in (normal)
After the initial graylist time, the user is
Greg Cirino wrote:
Hello,
Has anybody experienced issues when graylisting a domain and timeouts with
attachments (PDF files in my case)
Here is the scenario,
Remote users sends an email to a local domain user with a pdf attachment
The graylisting kicks in (normal)
After the
|
| Which end is timing out the connection? You can use spamdyke's excellent
| detailed logging to find out. My guess is that the session times out
| before spam/virus scanning is complete. If that's the case, either tune
| up your scanning if possible (put working directory in tmpfs?) or
|
Hi,
I use spamdyke 3 and got graylisting enabled. My expiration
time of graylisting token is set to one week. However,
despite continous mail exchange between two email addresses
I still see graylisting to take place. What I used to believe
was that once user A sent mail to B, then A's server
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Sam Clippinger s...@silence.org wrote:
Invalid recipients are not rejected by qmail at all; qmail accepts
messages for any user and later bounces them if the recipient doesn't
exist. This makes qmail a prolific source of backscatter spam.
Even if qmail did
Hi i wish to know if it's possible to add a domain at graylisting
directory, if it's added every email from that domain will be
automactly added and people start receiving emails from that domain.
I hope people can understand what i'm saying.
Nightduke
nightduke schrieb:
Hi i wish to know if it's possible to add a domain at graylisting
directory, if it's added every email from that domain will be
automactly added and people start receiving emails from that domain.
I hope people can understand what i'm saying.
Nightduke
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Marcin Orlowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if anyone tried to analyze his logs to find out how
effective gray listing is. I'd probably prefer to allow all
incoming mails (maybe with exceptions) and even disable
DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS blockers as it
The stats we have here (small 40 person company) are pretty much evenly
split between greylisting, early talkers and realtime blacklists :D
Marcin Orlowski wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if anyone tried to analyze his logs to find out how
effective gray listing is. I'd probably prefer to allow all
Hi,
I wonder if anyone tried to analyze his logs to find out how
effective gray listing is. I'd probably prefer to allow all
incoming mails (maybe with exceptions) and even disable
DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS blockers as it yet causes too much
collateral damages I can accept, even 99% of the mails
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 02:24:47PM +0200, Marcin Orlowski wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if anyone tried to analyze his logs to find out how effective
gray listing is. I'd probably prefer to allow all incoming mails (maybe
with exceptions) and even disable DENIED_IP_IN_CC_RDNS blockers as it yet
causes
When i first installed spamdyke, I used only greylisting. No other
blocks with it.
Prior to spamdyke: 40-60 spams a day (my personal account)
Post spamdyke: 2 in 6+ months.
Now of course your millage may vary based on how you use your account,
server setup, etc. But for me on a personal note,
On 5/9/2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So - graylisting - how effective it really is for you?
The only spam blocking I use presently is spamdyke with graylisting.
Pre-spamdyke I was getting 1000 spams/day into my personal mailbox.
Since installing spamdyke with graylisting I get 3-4
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of BC
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2008 11:09 AM
To: spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] Graylisting - how effective it really, is?
On 5/9/2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So - graylisting - how
The classic gotcha is not giving the user under which Spamdyke runs
permission to create directories in the graylist folder.
Spamdyke can check this, and other things, itself: follow instructions
for the unit test here:
http://www.spamdyke.org/documentation/README.html#CONFIGURATION_TEST
Ben
Andrew Liles wrote:
The classic gotcha is not giving the user under which Spamdyke runs
permission to create directories in the graylist folder.
You were right. For some reason I couldn't get the config test to work,
but I changed the ownership from root and graylisting started working
?
I wish to know if the graylisting it's working.
Thanks a lot
Nightduke
- Mensaje original
De: night duke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: spamdyke users spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado: lunes, 5 de noviembre, 2007 16:47:41
Asunto: Re: [spamdyke-users] graylisting
Thanks
night duke ha scritto:
I have not added at /var/qmail/graylist gmail.com but i still
receiving emails from gmail.
Well .. i think you have some problems to understand at least my poor
english :)
I'll try to re-explain all the stuff ...
The domain you must add it's not the source domain ,
]
Para: spamdyke users spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
Enviado: lunes, 12 de noviembre, 2007 16:21:12
Asunto: Re: [spamdyke-users] graylisting
night duke ha scritto:
I have not added at /var/qmail/graylist gmail.com but i still
receiving emails from gmail.
Well .. i think you have some problems
Sorry i'm a little bit lost with graylisting...
I must add manually the domains from where i want to receive emails from?
Thanks a lot
Nightduke
Filip RembiaÅkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: 2007/10/4, davide bozzelli :
night duke ha scritto:
So i must add only my domains there.I must
2007/10/4, davide bozzelli [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
night duke ha scritto:
So i must add only my domains there.I must add the domains from where
i want to receive?
Yes, more precisely the domain(s) you want to enable graylist for.
hehe
Yes, more precisely, no.
--
Filip Rembiałkowski
So i must add only my domains there.I must add the domains from where i want to
receive?
NIghtduke
BC [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On 10/3/2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok but i must add a directory on /var/qmail/spamdyke/graylisted/
Like gmail.com
It's not done automactly?I must do with
night duke ha scritto:
So i must add only my domains there.I must add the domains from where
i want to receive?
Yes, more precisely the domain(s) you want to enable graylist for.
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
If i don't add the domanin manually it's a problem to me.
Can not be automactly added?
Thanks
Nightduke
davide bozzelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: night duke ha scritto:
So i must add only my domains there.I must add the domains from where
i want to receive?
Yes, more precisely the
To activate graylisting:
1) Create a top-level folder, like /var/qmail/graylisting
2) Create one folder for each domain _you_host_. On my server, I
created /var/qmail/graylisting/silence.org. On your server, you don't
host silence.org, so you will use your own domain name(s).
3)
2007/10/3, night duke [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ok but i must add a directory on /var/qmail/spamdyke/graylisted/
Like gmail.com
It's not done automactly?I must do with all the domains i want receive
emails from?
you must create a subdirectory for each domain you RECEIVE emails.
F.
night duke ha scritto:
Ok but i must add a directory on /var/qmail/spamdyke/graylisted/
Like gmail.com
It's not done automactly?I must do with all the domains i want receive
emails from?
Thanks
Nightduke
I think you have'nt read the docs at all .
You should create a folder for you
On 10/3/2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok but i must add a directory on /var/qmail/spamdyke/graylisted/
Like gmail.com
It's not done automactly?I must do with all the domains i want
receive emails from?
You tell spamdyke the DOMAIN for which the greylisting will occur.
For example, I have
I have this problem in local partition (xfs), see the same messages:
INFO(graylist-dir): Testing graylist directory:
/var/cache/graylist/DOMAIN.COM.BR
ERROR(graylist-dir): Found non-regular file in graylist folder where
Note: error in /var/cache/graylist/DOMAIN.COM.BR, not in
Hi i'm a little bit lost.Can anyone tell me what must have
/var/qmail/graylisting directory.
I must add there a file with the domains i want to receive emails from?.
Thanks.
Nightduke
-
Sé un Mejor Amante del Cine
¿Quieres saber cómo?
night duke ha scritto:
Hi i wish to know if i can use graylisting with spamdyke i don't have
vpopmail.
It's possible?
Vpopmail is simply a user manager tool aka virtual user tool for qmail .
Spamdyke does not speak at all with vpopmail for graylist.
So the answer is: yes, you can,
59 matches
Mail list logo
