Hi i would like to know when will we released a new version of
spamdyke, i still using version of 2008.
Thanks
___
spamdyke-users mailing list
spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
http://www.spamdyke.org/mailman/listinfo/spamdyke-users
nightduke wrote:
> Hi i would like to know when will we released a new version of
> spamdyke, i still using version of 2008.
>
> Thanks
4.0.10 was released 12/17/08. I'm not aware of any bugs since then.
Only Sam can say for sure when a new release will be coming. Are you
looking for something
More featues with graylisting.Better perfomance.
2010/2/10 Eric Shubert :
> nightduke wrote:
>> Hi i would like to know when will we released a new version of
>> spamdyke, i still using version of 2008.
>>
>> Thanks
>
> 4.0.10 was released 12/17/08. I'm not aware of any bugs since then.
>
> Only
Which graylisting features are you looking for specificallly?
Have you run the qtp-prune-graylist script I posted recently? Perhaps
that will solve your performance issue? If not, what are you seeing that
leads you to believe there is a problem with performance?
nightduke wrote:
> More featues
The SpamDyke works great! without bugs.
But is Very usefull (Excellent), if you can set some features per
domain.
Two Level to filter SPAM
- General Level for all domains (the actual level)
- And add a Domain Level Filter with features like: blacklist and
whitelist lists (sender-blacklist, ,
Jorge R. Constenla wrote:
> The SpamDyke works great! without bugs.
>
> But is Very usefull (Excellent), if you can set some features per domain.
>
> Two Level to filter SPAM
> - General Level for all domains (the actual level)
> - And add a Domain Level Filter with features like: blacklist and
More features with graylisting,fast enable graylisting, gui for
spamdyke, log level,log analyser, warnings, error, dspam options to
integrate with dspam.
I mean those features, will be great, subdomain options too...
In my modest opinion.
2010/2/10 Eric Shubert :
> Jorge R. Constenla wrote:
>>
nightduke wrote:
> More features with graylisting,fast enable graylisting,
I don't know what you mean by this. Perhaps Sam does.
> gui for spamdyke,
There has been talk about this, and I believe someone has written
something for this. I don't recall off hand though. You'll need to do
some sear
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org
[mailto:spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org] Im Auftrag von nightduke
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Februar 2010 21:10
An: spamdyke users
Betreff: Re: [spamdyke-users] new version of spamdyke?
More features with graylisting,fast
The directory configuration is very complex but I think that I can't
block senders (domains or email) per domain that I hosts.
Do you know if you can do?
Thanks in advance.
Eric Shubert wrote:
> Jorge R. Constenla wrote:
>
>> The SpamDyke works great! without bugs.
>>
>> But is Very usefull
If you give me some examples of what you're trying to do, I might be
able to tell you how to do it. I'm not sure though, as I don't use this
capability myself. Sam would know best.
Jorge R. Constenla wrote:
> The directory configuration is very complex but I think that I can't
> block senders (
Could you be more specific? spamdyke's graylisting feature is done to
the best of my knowledge -- it does everything a graylist should do.
As far as I know, there is a GUI for spamdyke available as a plugin for
Plesk, written by haggybear. You can find it here:
http://www.haggybear.com/en/spa
Yes, you can. The "config-dir" option basically lets you specify a
different spamdyke configuration file for every domain you host. If you
want, you can specify different configuration files for each user as
well. You can also give different configurations for sender addresses,
rDNS names or
Sam,
Thanks, It's really cool!. Do you know about Server Performance?
Consuming?
Another question, Can I block invalid users? I need to receive emails
only to a valid users.
Is there any way to accept only valid users and block non-existent
users?
For example: The users in example.com are 3:
I'm not sure what you're asking about Server Performance or Consuming.
If you want to know if the "config-dir" option causes spamdyke to run
slower, the answer is yes, but just barely. With that option enabled,
spamdyke has to do more work to look for additional configuration files,
but not v
I'm going to change to the "config-dir" option in
our servers, so that each domain can set your options and integrating
with our control panel.
I'll wait the next version for "block mail to invalid recipients"
feature.
Thanks.
Best regards.
Sam Clippinger wrote:
I'm not sure what you're a
Jorge,
I know that qmail-toaster (http://qmailtoaster.com) can block mail to
invalid recipients. Well, it doesn't exactly block. It bounces, or
deletes, or delivers to a catchall account. I'm not suggesting you
convert, but you might have a look at it to see how it accomplishes
this. I believe
Yes I know. They use CHKUSER 2.0.
But, I'm looking for a solutions to block SMTP sessions in our MXs.
Thanks anyway.
Eric Shubert wrote:
> Jorge,
>
> I know that qmail-toaster (http://qmailtoaster.com) can block mail to
> invalid recipients. Well, it doesn't exactly block. It bounces, or
> dele
18 matches
Mail list logo
