[spctools-discuss] Re: Problem with XPressPeptideParser

2011-10-21 Thread Ping
me know. > > Since you're using linux, build XPressPeptideParser from either the > trunk or branch4-5 code. > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Ping wrote: > > Hi, > > > I installed tpp 4.5 on a Ubuntu 10.04 system. While I run > > XPressPeptideParser o

[spctools-discuss] Problem with XPressPeptideParser

2011-10-20 Thread Ping
something with mzXML file. Can anyone help? Thanks, Ping -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spctools-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to spctools-discuss@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to spctoo

[spctools-discuss] Re: Announcing TPP release: 4.5.0 "Rapture"

2011-10-04 Thread Ping
e_t temp= fread(buffer,1,200,f); saxmzxmlhandler.cpp:size_t temp= fread(buffer,1,200,f); Thanks, Ping On Oct 4, 11:37 am, Ping wrote: > No I tired to on ubuntu 10.4 using installer_linux > > The error message I got is after I run > > sh ./install-prerequisites-ubuntu

[spctools-discuss] Re: Announcing TPP release: 4.5.0 "Rapture"

2011-10-04 Thread Ping
No I tired to on ubuntu 10.4 using installer_linux The error message I got is after I run sh ./install-prerequisites-ubuntu-9_04.sh cd ../src/ make Thanks, Ping On Oct 3, 4:34 pm, Joseph Slagel wrote: > Are you trying to install using the window's installer, or build it?  and if

[spctools-discuss] Re: Announcing TPP release: 4.5.0 "Rapture"

2011-10-03 Thread Ping
/mzParser/mzParser.h:3617: error: ‘uint32_t’ has not been declared Parsers/mzParser/mzParser.h:3618: error: ‘uint64_t’ does not name a type Did I do something wrong? Thanks, Ping On Sep 21, 4:50 pm, Joseph Slagel wrote: > Announcing the availability of Trans-Proteomic Pipeline (TPP) "Rapt

[spctools-discuss] Re: Proteome Discoverer

2010-03-04 Thread Ping
le).  Example > > modifications include a +16 variable mod on methionine and a static > > mod of +57 on cysteines: > >    http://proteomicsresource.washington.edu/sequest_params.php > > > What we really need is someone to contribute a .msf to pep.xml converter! > > > On Thu, Ma

[spctools-discuss] Re: Proteome Discoverer

2010-03-04 Thread Ping
cysteines: >    http://proteomicsresource.washington.edu/sequest_params.php > > What we really need is someone to contribute a .msf to pep.xml converter! > > > > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Ping wrote: > > Thanks Jimmy! > > > Is there any sequest.params sample wi

[spctools-discuss] Re: Proteome Discoverer

2010-03-04 Thread Ping
Thanks Jimmy! Is there any sequest.params sample with modifications I can get? Thanks again! Ping On Mar 3, 5:16 pm, Jimmy Eng wrote: > unless there's a way to convert .msf to pep.xml, and I'm not aware of > any tool that does this, you'll have to go the .out route.

[spctools-discuss] Proteome Discoverer

2010-03-03 Thread Ping
Hi All, The output of the Proteome Discover is *.msf. Is there an easy way to compute peptide prophet from it? Or I have to run sequest.exe to get *.out to do so? Thanks! Ping -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spctools-discuss" group.

[spctools-discuss] build OMSSA under Ubuntu 64 bit

2009-09-04 Thread Ping
Hi All, Has anyone build OMSSA under Ubuntu 64 bit? I got it successfully complied along with NCBI tool kit, but it got very slow now. I noticed that it only use one processor instead of original 8 processors to run the omssacl. Does anyone have any suggestion on this? Thanks! Ping

[spctools-discuss] Re: The problem with running xinteract on OMSSA pepxml

2009-07-14 Thread Ping
That is where I got the NAN error at the first point. Thanks, Ping On Jul 14, 8:46 am, GATTACA wrote: > Ping, > > Could you post what changes you made to the > NonParametricDistribution.cxx to fix the NAN error? > > Thanks. > > On Jul 9, 1:21 pm, Ping wrote: &

[spctools-discuss] Combine Search Results

2009-07-13 Thread Ping
Hi, I got a list of the search results which used different search parameters, I already run InteractParser and PeptideProphetParser on each of them. Is there an easy way to merge individual pep.xml into one pep.xml file and with the hits ranked by peptide prophet? Thanks, Ping

[spctools-discuss] Re: The problem with running xinteract on OMSSA pepxml

2009-07-09 Thread Ping
suggested, I do not need to replace the value in the "protein" with the first word from the "protein_descr" in each search_hit entry. Thanks again, Ping On Jul 6, 1:55 pm, Jimmy Eng wrote: > Has anyone been able to feed OMSSA native pepXML output (using -op > option)

[spctools-discuss] Re: The problem with running xinteract on OMSSA pepxml

2009-07-06 Thread Ping
! Is there anything else I need to fix? Thanks! Ping Here is the example of the result after I replace protein/ protein_descr for not decoy string, it looks like this: For decoy string, it looks like this: On Jul 2, 4:44 pm, Jimmy Eng wrote: > Ping, > > I just downloa

[spctools-discuss] Re: The problem with running xinteract on OMSSA pepxml

2009-07-06 Thread Ping
Jimmy, As you suggested, I replace the value in the "protein" with the first word from the "protein_descr" in each search_hit entry: for not decoy string, it looks like this: For decoy string, it looks like this: Is there anything else I need to fix? Thanks!

[spctools-discuss] Re: The problem with running xinteract on OMSSA pepxml

2009-07-03 Thread Ping
.cpp", line 228: Error: NCBI-BlastDL::Blast-def-line.title Ping On Jul 3, 3:46 am, Jake W wrote: > One solution to this is to use the indexing option ("-o T") in > formatdb when formatting your BLAST database for OMSSA searching.  In > my experience, that will result

[spctools-discuss] Re: The problem with running xinteract on OMSSA pepxml

2009-07-02 Thread Ping
alert the developer !!! I will try Jimmy's suggestion and see how it goes. Thanks again! Ping On Jul 2, 7:15 pm, David Shteynberg wrote: > If you are running the tpp on the commandline you can correct this > problem in theomssaoutput by running the steps of xinteract > separatel

[spctools-discuss] Re: The problem with running xinteract on OMSSA pepxml

2009-07-02 Thread Ping
Jimmy, Thanks a lot for your explanation. I am going to write a script to fix the pep.xml file and see how it goes. Ping On Jul 2, 4:44 pm, Jimmy Eng wrote: > Ping, > > I just downloadedOMSSA2.1.4 and tried the direct pep.xml export > myself.  I do see a problem with the resul

[spctools-discuss] Re: The problem with running xinteract on OMSSA pepxml

2009-07-02 Thread Ping
Does any one have suggestion on this problem? I used the omssacl -op option to generate the pepxml result. Will this cause problems? Thanks, Ping Yan --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spc

[spctools-discuss] Re: The problem with running xinteract on OMSSA pepxml

2009-06-30 Thread Ping
Is this something else and suppose to be a new post? YP On Jun 30, 11:08 am, "Zhi Sun" wrote: > Hi all, > > I just checked in two programs, and did not put the log message. > > I will give a short description here: > > createChargeFile.pl: this program reads the ms2 file generated by CPM > (cha

[spctools-discuss] The problem with running xinteract on OMSSA pepxml

2009-06-30 Thread Ping
t is still not working. InteractParse went through, but PeptideProphetParser got stuck by a segmentation fault. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Many Thanks, Ping * output for interactParser and PeptideProphetParser InteractParser 'interact.pep.xml' 'omssa.pep.xml' -

[spctools-discuss] Re: Question about Qualscore

2009-04-16 Thread Ping
Luis, Thanks a lot! I just realize that the xml file from TPP output is already run through PeptideProphet with 0.05 cutoff. I will try to rerun the xtandem along to see how it works. Best, Ping On Apr 16, 11:52 am, Luis Mendoza wrote: > Hello Ping, > Yes, please make sure you run xin

[spctools-discuss] Re: Question about Qualscore

2009-04-16 Thread Ping
searched under X!tandem. The result I used is from TPP. Thanks again! Ping On Apr 15, 3:42 pm, Luis Mendoza wrote: > Hi Ping, > By "the same results", do you mean that all of the program output is > identical? (e.g. the number of spectra used, etc)  Or just that you also get >

[spctools-discuss] Re: Question about Qualscore

2009-04-15 Thread Ping
search for the same topic in the group. Someone said it might because of the mzXML files? Thanks again! Ping On Apr 15, 11:44 am, Luis Mendoza wrote: > Hello Ping, > Qualscore uses a pepXML file with *all* PeptideProphet probabilities (i.e. > P>=0.0).  As such, you will first need to

[spctools-discuss] Re: Question about Qualscore

2009-04-15 Thread Ping
searched the post in the group, and used -p0 option, but still I got the same results. Does that mean my original mzXML has too little low quality spectral data? Thanks again, Ping On Apr 15, 11:44 am, Luis Mendoza wrote: > Hello Ping, > Qualscore uses a pepXML file with *all* PeptideP

[spctools-discuss] Question about Qualscore

2009-04-15 Thread Ping
forgive me if the question is too simple. Thanks! Ping --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spctools-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to spctools-discuss@googlegroups.com To u