riginal Message -
From: "W. Trevor King" <wk...@tremily.us>
To: "David A Wheeler" <dwhee...@ida.org>
Cc: "Richard Fontana" <rfont...@redhat.com>, "J Lovejoy"
<opensou...@jilayne.com>, "SPDX-legal" <spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org&
Richard Fontana:
> The way I read the matching guidelines this license does not actually match
> to BSD-3-Clause, even though it obviously should. I think the problem is
> that I am reading the matching guidelines more literally than they may be
> intended to be read, but given that this is
To: "David Wheeler" <dwhee...@ida.org>
Cc: "SPDX-legal" <spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org>, "David Parrish"
<daveparr...@tutanota.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 12:02:03 AM
Subject: Re: New License Request: The Glasgow Haskell Compiler License
H
Hi David (P),
David W is right - this is the same license as BSD-3-Clause. The only
difference is in the “replaceable” text (i.e., the names) as per the license
matching guidelines and which you can see visually in the red text on the
license webpage here:
David Parrish:
> 1. Provide a proposed Full Name for the license or exception.
> The Glasgow Haskell Compiler License
> 2. Provide a proposed Short Identifier.
> ghc
>3. Provide a functioning url reference to the license or exception text,
>either from the author or a community recognized source.
1. Provide a proposed Full Name for the license or exception.
The Glasgow Haskell Compiler License
2. Provide a proposed Short Identifier.
ghc
3. Provide a functioning url reference to the license or exception text, either
from the author or a community recognized source.
