RE: Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX) specification for Public Domain, Government Works? Possible New License/Exception Request

2016-04-17 Thread Robinson, Norman
license - that always confuses me! -Original Message- From: Philippe Ombredanne [mailto:pombreda...@nexb.com] Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 10:03 AM To: Robinson, Norman Cc: spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org Subject: Re: Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX) specification for Public Domain, Gove

RE: Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX) specification for Public Domain, Government Works? Possible New License/Exception Request

2016-04-17 Thread Robinson, Norman
From: Philippe Ombredanne [mailto:pombreda...@nexb.com] Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 10:58 AM To: Robinson, Norman Cc: spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org Subject: Re: Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX) specification for Public Domain, Government Works? Possible New License/Exception Request On Thu, Apr 14, 2

RE: Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX) specification for Public Domain, Government Works? Possible New License/Exception Request

2016-04-17 Thread Zavras, Alexios
rom: spdx-legal-boun...@lists.spdx.org [mailto:spdx-legal-boun...@lists.spdx.org] On Behalf Of Philippe Ombredanne Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 6:06 PM To: spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org Subject: Re: Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX) specification for Public Domain, Government Works? Possible New License/Excep

Re: Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX) specification for Public Domain, Government Works? Possible New License/Exception Request

2016-04-15 Thread Philippe Ombredanne
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Wheeler, David A wrote: > Gisi, Mark: >> The absence of Public Domain from the license list was not an oversight. A >> fair amount of discussion took place to decide how to handle a public domain >> designation. The current practice is to create a LicenseRef (a use

Re: Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX) specification for Public Domain, Government Works? Possible New License/Exception Request

2016-04-15 Thread Philippe Ombredanne
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 11:12 PM, Robinson, Norman wrote: [...] > While it could be argued UPL or public domain or CC0 1.0 > (creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) (SPDX CC0-1.0) does that, I > believe citing the reasoning it is public domain, because it is a US > Government work, will be mo

RE: Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX) specification for Public Domain, Government Works? Possible New License/Exception Request

2016-04-15 Thread Wheeler, David A
Gisi, Mark: > The absence of Public Domain from the license list was not an oversight. A > fair amount of discussion took place to decide how to handle a public domain > designation. The current practice is to create a LicenseRef (a user defined > license reference that is local to an SPDX file)

RE: Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX) specification for Public Domain, Government Works? Possible New License/Exception Request

2016-04-15 Thread Gisi, Mark
Hi Norman, >> In review of SPDX specification (spdx.org/), I'm not seeing a clear >> annotation for U.S. Public >> Domain. Could you please clarify if such a license currently exists and I >> have failed >> to understand or find it? The absence of Public Domain from the license list was not an

Re: Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX) specification for Public Domain, Government Works? Possible New License/Exception Request

2016-04-14 Thread Philippe Ombredanne
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Robinson, Norman wrote: > Greetings! > > In review of SPDX specification (spdx.org/), I’m not seeing a clear > annotation for U.S. Public Domain. Could you please clarify if such a > license currently exists and I have failed to understand or find it? Any > links o