Concerning this aspect Avnery does not equate them he tells that the
discourse of the pope was mixing several things that appeared in alliance of
fact with the objectives of Bush.
Of course yes.
Why the pope would have corrected it as soon as possible if there would not
be a hard problem?
The
Why the pope would have corrected it as soon as possible if there would not
be a hard problem?
I dont think he has anything corrected, he just made clear what he had
allready said. Read that speech, it is at vatican.com, with a rather
ugly background gif.
Maybe I am a little bit picky
Heiko, what not give the active link of a translation in EN or the original
one in German, please?
I have searched but not found fro vatican.com
I have founded it in an integral translation in FR. Sorry I do not founded
it in EN:
http://www.lemonde.fr/web/article/0,[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL
english:
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/speeches/2006/
september/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20060912_university-
regensburg_en.html
français:
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/speeches/2006/
september/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20060912_university-
Thanks.
Very interesting philosophical discourse as anthropology of EU formation of
the thought; but EU hegemonic (not integrating the southern culture of FR,
SP, IT which is historically and philosophically a multi culture)
More the renewal of the scientific paradigm from experimental turning
Uri Avnery is putting things in a strange order, whatever this is good
for, and, most important, people like to overlook it, he forgets to tell
us that the question, it was not more than a question, was part of a
longer conversation amongst FRIENDS!
At the end of the
14th century, the Emperor
Hi! Heiko,
I am not a co-activist from Gush Shalom, but I appreciate their activism
more their traditional mode of aphorisms which tells from inside the one who
writes, a sort of subjective but certain tribute not a command, to others,
what respects self freedom; it is so much more interesting,
