The errata to RFC8754 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7102) improved the
definition of the segments left field for all SID behaviors and flavors
(including CSID).
I agree, this issue is closed.
Darren
On 2023-08-08, 11:00 AM, "spring" wrote:
Issue #3 in the datatracker reads
The defi
The protections described in RFC8754 apply to any SRv6 deployment and any SID
behavior or flavor. While writing RFC8754 text, there was a great deal of
discussion and consideration given to protecting SIDs from misuse, and that
resulted in the filtering described in 5.1, SRH filtering was never
The adopted version of this document really needed to do a better job at
describing ICMP error processing (iirc it said nothing :). I’m glad the new
text describes the process and closes that hole.
I believe the new text in the draft is sufficient to close this issue.
Thanks
Darren
On 2023-
Hi Nick,
Thanks for your email - sorry for delayed response as I am out-of-office.
Yes, and the section 7.2 explains how to compress SID list using the next
flavor or the replace flavor or both. Emails from Changwang Lin and Darren
Dukes on this tread provides further explanation. I hope that cl
Hi Zafar,
thank you for pointing out the text in Section 7.2. I think that it might
be the right place to illustrate that the defined behaviors indeed are part
of the same data plane. And it can be started with an update of the first
sentence like the following:
OLD TEXT:
An SR source node MAY c
A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Alvaro Retana, a
Chair of the SPRING Working Group.
-
Working Group Name: Source Packet Routing in Networking
Area Name: Routing Area
Session Requester: Alvaro Retana
Number of Se
Hi Greg, thanks for clarifying your concerns with proposed text. I like the
inclusion of “and/or”, it makes it clear to the reader immediately that a
segment list consisting of both flavors is compressible by the following
processes. I would not include “in a single SRH” since the presence of t
Hi Joel,
I believe that draft-ietf-6man-sids addresses the concerns brought up and
this issue should be resolved.
Thanks
Suresh
> On Aug 15, 2023, at 9:30 PM, Joel Halpern wrote:
>
> As mentioned earlier, we also need to confirm the resolution of issue #2 on
> the subject document.
>
> Thi
Hi Joel and WG,
I think this issue can be closed.As illustrated in the draft,all the SRv6 SIDs
can co-exist.It is coherent with the one data plane solution objective.
Best Regards,
Liyan
邮件原文发件人：Joel Halpern 收件人：SPRING WG List
抄 送: (无)发送时间：2023-08-01 05:08:34主题：[spring] Issue
