Hi Alvro:
Please see inline.
Thanks
Zhibo
From: rtgwg [mailto:rtgwg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alvaro Retana
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2024 8:55 PM
To: Yingzhen Qu ; spring-cha...@ietf.org; Ketan
Talaulikar
Cc: RTGWG ; rtgwg-chairs ;
draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection
Hi Ketan/ALL:
Please see inline.
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ketan Talaulikar
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 12:06 AM
To: Yingzhen Qu
Cc: RTGWG ; spring@ietf.org; rtgwg-chairs
; draft-cheng-rtgwg-srv6-multihome-egress-protection
Subject: Re: [spring] WG
Hi：
As a co-author of this two deafts.
· Do we need these different solutions?
YES，draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection-16 manually plan active/standby
and VPN protection relationships. Data packet needs to carry only one VPN SID.
It is applicable to scenarios where CE
I have reviewed the latest version of this document and it has achieved broad
consensus and has many deployments, thus I support its publication.
Best regards,
Zhibo
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Joel Halpern
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2024 10:28 PM
To: SPRING WG
Many thanks for Joel for handling the work. After reading all the resolutions,
I agree to close them all. Thanks to Authors for their excellent work！ PS. in
order to avoid sending a lots of emails, I share my POV in this email to close
issue 1,3,4 and 5.
Zhibo
From: spring
et-dra...@ietf.org]
> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2023 10:00 PM
> To: Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) ; xixing (A)
> ; Huzhibo
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-hu-lsr-igp-link-mtu-00.txt
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-hu-lsr-igp-link-mtu-00.txt has been successfully
> s
Hi folks:
Based on the discussions held at the 115th IETF meeting, we summarized the
comments related to SRv6 midpoint protection, and then let's see how this
document can be further move ahead.
Q: how does SRv6 Midpoint protection differentiate the condition the route is
not present vs. link
oh, sorry, I meant "1. the node will not process the TLV if the length of TLV
is NOT longer that (0+1)*2. ", sorry for missing the important word.
From: Huzhibo
Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2022 9:10 AM
To: 'spring@ietf.org'
Subject: Question of SRH.Last_entry=0 in Reduced mode
Hi SPRIN
Hi SPRING,
I have a simple question: Do we allow to have empty Segment list in SRH? For
instance, only carry common SRH header(8 Bytes) or carry the Common header with
option TLV without any SID.
According to the definition of RFC8754[1], "TLVs are present when the Hdr Ext
Len is greater
2287
Email: huzh...@huawei.com
发件人：slitkows.ietf
收件人：Huzhibo ;bruno.decraene
;'SPRING WG'
时 间：2022-01-31 21:06:57
主 题：RE: [spring] WG adoption call -
draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding
[HZB2]First: This document does not require that all affected traffic be
directed to "one
Please see inline.
From: slitkows.i...@gmail.com [mailto:slitkows.i...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2022 4:58 PM
To: Huzhibo ; bruno.decra...@orange.com; 'SPRING WG'
Subject: RE: [spring] WG adoption call -
draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding
Hi
[HZB2]First
during network upgrades.
From: Shraddha Hegde [mailto:shraddha=40juniper@dmarc.ietf.org]
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2022 4:41 PM
To: Huzhibo ; bruno.decra...@orange.com; SPRING WG
Subject: RE: WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding
Huzhibo,
Pls see inline
Shraddha,
Pls see inline for replies.
From: Shraddha Hegde [mailto:shraddha=40juniper@dmarc.ietf.org]
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2022 12:20 PM
To: Huzhibo ; bruno.decra...@orange.com; SPRING WG
Subject: RE: WG adoption call - draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding
Huzhibo,
Pls
From: slitkows.i...@gmail.com [mailto:slitkows.i...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2022 1:41 AM
To: Huzhibo ; bruno.decra...@orange.com; 'SPRING WG'
Subject: RE: [spring] WG adoption call -
draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding
Hi,
[SLI] Your statement is purely theoretical
Hi Shraddha:
Thanks for your comments, Please see inline.
Thanks
Zhibo Hu
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Shraddha Hegde
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2022 3:15 PM
To: bruno.decra...@orange.com; SPRING WG
Subject: Re: [spring] WG adoption call -
Hi,
Please find more inline.
From: slitkows.i...@gmail.com [mailto:slitkows.i...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2022 4:54 PM
To: Huzhibo ; bruno.decra...@orange.com; 'SPRING WG'
Subject: RE: [spring] WG adoption call -
draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forwarding
Hi,
Please
Hi slitkows :
Thanks for your comments, Please see inline.
Thanks
Zhibo Hu
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
slitkows.i...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2022 1:13 AM
To: bruno.decra...@orange.com; 'SPRING WG'
Subject: Re: [spring] WG adoption call -
Hi WG,
I support its adoption as author. It provides a complete FRR mechanism for
SR-TE Node/Link/Binding Sid failure. Including before IGP convergence,and
after IGP convergence to before TE convergence.
Best Regards,
Zhibo Hu
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Hi WG:
I'm not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this draft.
Best Regards,
Zhibo Hu
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
bruno.decra...@orange.com
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 6:18 PM
To: SPRING WG ;
draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-proxy-forward...@ietf.org
Hi SPRING,
>From my understanding, REPLACE-CSID flavor and NEXT-CSID flavor just like PSP,
>USP, USD flavor defined in RFC8986. I cannot treat PSP, USP, USD as different
>data planes. All the SRv6 behaviors will have different data plane behaviors,
>but they are built under the same data
yes, I support the adoption. Many thanks to DT's excellent contributions!
Zhibo Hu
发件人: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 bruno.decra...@orange.com
发送时间: 2021年9月7日 21:13
收件人: spring@ietf.org
主题: [spring] WG Adoption call - draft-srcompdt-spring-compression-requirement -
Hi,
I have read the draft and support the publication.
Thanks,
Zhibo
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
bruno.decra...@orange.com
Sent: Friday, March 5, 2021 1:45 AM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-spring-nsh...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] WG Last Call
Hi:
I am not aware of any IPR related to this document.
Thanks
Zhibo Hu
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2021 1:06 AM
To: James Guichard ; spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] Completion of WG Adoption
Support,. It is a specific application scenario of resource-aware-segments.
Best Regards,
Zhibo Hu
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 7:47 PM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call
Hi all：
I think this draft is a useful topic，However, I think there is still space
for improvement in this solution. According to the solution in the draft, the
size of the context table of each node is the number of neighbors * (the number
of network nodes + the number of neighbors of
Hi Jim, Joel & Bruno,
As a co-author I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this document.
Thanks,
Zhibo
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 6:43 PM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring]
Hi Joel and all:
I think node protected is used when the SLA of a path cannot be quickly
repaired. E2E detection cannot be deployed in some scenarios. As a result, the
faulty path cannot be repaired at the headend.
To prevent SR policy from bypassing Service Sid, if the Per Sid
Hi WG,
I support the WG adoption. It is a useful enhancement to SR and can provides
better network SLA assurance capabilities.
Thanks,
Zhibo
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2020 7:17 PM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc:
support the adoption.
Thanks
Zhibo
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 11:38 PM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-raza-spring-sr-policy-yang
Dear WG:
This email begins a
Hi spring:
Support as a co-author. I think it's ready to move forward.
Thanks
Zhibo
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James Guichard
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2020 5:52 AM
To: spring@ietf.org
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call for
Yes, If it isn`t the last Sid,It will execut other protection behavior.
Thanks
Zhibo
From: Heminhong [mailto:he.minh...@h3c.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 2:37 PM
To: Huzhibo ; huaimo.c...@futurewei.com;
chenhu...@chinatelecom.cn; Wupeng (Baggio, VRP MKT) ;
mehmet@verizon.com; cao
。Or It will execut other
protect behavior.
Thanks
Zhibo
From: Heminhong [mailto:he.minh...@h3c.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 9:42 AM
To: Huzhibo ; huaimo.c...@futurewei.com;
chenhu...@chinatelecom.cn; Wupeng (Baggio, VRP MKT) ;
mehmet@verizon.com; cao...@chinaunicom.cn; he
+1
Thanks
Zhibo
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lizhenbin
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 7:55 PM
To: bruno.decra...@orange.com; 'SPRING WG List'
Cc: 6...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
Subject: [spring] Request to close the LC and move
+1 support Jingrong's point.
Thanks
Zhibo
-Original Message-
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Xiejingrong
(Jingrong)
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 5:51 PM
To: Mark Smith ; Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
Cc: Ron Bonica ; spring@ietf.org; Joel M. Halpern
Support.
Best regards
Zhibo Hu
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
bruno.decra...@orange.com
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2019 12:54 AM
To: SPRING WG
Subject: [spring] draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming - 2 week Early
Allocation Call
Hi SPRING WG,
This begins
Hi Shraddha:
You say can keep forwarding plane longer. I don't know which stage of the
forwarding state you are maintaining. The IGP determines the node fault by
sensing multiple link faults. Because the nodes are aware of the link faults in
different order, the state before the forwarding
Support these two drafts.
Best Regards,
Zhibo
From: Idr [mailto:idr-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 2:13 AM
To: 'idr wg' ; 'SPRING WG List'
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption: draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03.txt
and
uzh...@huawei.com>
发件人：Mark Smith
收件人：Huzhibo
抄 送：Robert Raszuk ;Ron Bonica
;spring@ietf.org
;6...@ietf.org <6...@ietf.org>
时间：2019-09-07 17:36:11
主题Re: [spring] Regaining Focus on SRv6 and SRv6+
Hi,
On Sat, 7 Sep 2019 at 18:08, Huzhibo wrote:
>
> Hi Mark:
> I don't t
: Saturday, September 07, 2019 2:04 PM
To: Huzhibo
Cc: Robert Raszuk ; Ron Bonica
; spring@ietf.org; 6...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] Regaining Focus on SRv6 and SRv6+
On Sat, 7 Sep 2019 at 14:58, Huzhibo wrote:
>
> Hi Robert:
>
>
>
> Agree with you.
>
> SRv6 i
Hi Robert:
Agree with you.
SRv6 is a completely different technology from SR MPLS. The biggest difference
is that SRv6's Sid itself has routing capabilities. For example, it is
aggregatable, it is programmable, it is globally unique over a larger scope.
of. Sid's routing capabilities bring
support the adoption.
Zhibo
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Rob Shakir
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2019 2:14 PM
To: SPRING WG List
Subject: [spring] WG Adoption Call: draft-guichard-spring-nsh-sr
Hi SPRING WG,
This email initiates a two week working group adoption call
@dmarc.ietf.org]
发送时间: 2019年4月1日 16:26
收件人: chenhn8...@chinatelecom.cn; Huzhibo; Huaimo Chen
抄送: SPRING WG; i...@ietf.org
主题: [spring]
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-rtgwg-srv6-midpoint-protection/
Hi All,
Section 2.3 Endpoint x Node as PLR
Here we are handling 2 times failure (One layer-3
.It cann`t work.
3: if using anycast address,CE1 is connect to PE1/PE2,CE2 is connect PE2/PE3，It
will be hard to develop.
4: if using anycast address,PM is unavailable.
Ths
Zhibo
From: Rajesh M [mailto:mraj...@juniper.net]
Sent: Monday, April 01, 2019 2:08 PM
To: Huzhibo ; Huaimo Chen ; Wupeng
(Baggio
Support!
Ths
Zhibo Hu
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
bruno.decra...@orange.com
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 2:50 AM
To: SPRING WG
Cc: draft-filsfils-spring-srv6-network-programm...@ietf.org
Subject: [spring] Working Group Adoption Call for
Hi Bruno,
I would like to get a 15 minute slot (10 to present, 5 Q) to present
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hu-spring-segment-routing-rsvp-te-interop/..
speaker will be Xia Chen.
Thanks!
Zhibo Hu
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
bruno.decra...@orange.com
Hi Martin and All
This is my request for the YANG Data Model for SRv6 presentation slot
Draft name : draft-hu-spring-srv6-yang
Speaker: Zhibo Hu, Robin, Satoru Matsushima
Duration: 10min
Thanks
Zhibo
-邮件原件-
发件人: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Martin Vigoureux
46 matches
Mail list logo
