[spring] A comment regarding the relationship between RLD and ERLD

人: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) [mailto:ket...@cisco.com] > 发送时间: 2017年12月21日 12:16 > 收件人: Xuxiaohu; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg); Christian Hopps; isis...@ietf.org > 抄送: isis-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-...@ietf.org > 主题: RE: [Isis-wg] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-segment-ro

[spring] 转发: New Version Notification for draft-xu-clad-spring-sr-service-chaining-00.txt

et-dra...@ietf.org] > 发送时间: 2017年12月22日 19:57 > 收件人: daniel.bern...@bell.ca; Xuxiaohu; Chaitanya Yadlapalli; Bruno > Decraene; Francois Clad; Daniel Bernier; Stefano Salsano; Shaowen Ma; Wim > Henderickx; Clarence Filsfils > 主题: New Version Notification for > draft-xu-clad-spring-sr

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

e the source port of the UDP tunnel header to carry the path identity, just like the idea of using the unified SR approach to address the load-balancing issue associated with the MPLS-SR. 徐小虎 Xuxiaohu M：+86-13910161692 E：xuxia...@huawei.com<mail

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

s/per flow/per path. 徐小虎 Xuxiaohu M：+86-13910161692 E：xuxia...@huawei.com<mailto:xuxia...@huawei.com> 产品与解决方案-网络战略与业务发展部 Products & Solutions-Network Strategy & Business Development Dept 发件人： Xuxiaohu 收件人： Jeff Tantsuramailto:jefftant.i...@gmai

Re: [spring] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

The beauty of MPLS-SR is less states are required. To keep it as beautiful as possible, it'd better for us to overcome the impulsion of adding more and more complicated functions. Best regards, Xiaohu 徐小虎 Xuxiaohu M：+86-13910161692 E：xuxia...@huawe

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

If so, why not directly use RSVP-TE if the per flow state is needed? 徐小虎 Xuxiaohu M：+86-13910161692 E：xuxia...@huawei.com<mailto:xuxia...@huawei.com> 产品与解决方案-网络战略与业务发展部 Products & Solutions-Network Strategy & Business Development Dept 发件人： Jef

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

徐小虎 Xuxiaohu M：+86-13910161692 E：xuxia...@huawei.com<mailto:xuxia...@huawei.com> 产品与解决方案-网络战略与业务发展部 Products & Solutions-Network Strategy & Business Development Dept 发件人： Greg Mirsky 收件人： Xuxiaohumailto:xuxia...@huawei.com>> 抄送： Zafar Ali (zali)mailto:z...@cisco.com&

Re: [spring] [mpls] Special purpose labels in draft-hegde-spring-traffic-accounting-for-sr-paths

Concur. Although it has some values, it's not cost-efficient from my point of view. Network simplicity should be the first priority object. Hence we would have to make some compromise. Best regards, Xiaohu 徐小虎 Xuxiaohu M：+86-13910161692 E：xuxia...@huawe

[spring] 答复: Slots requests for SPRING WG session - IETF 100 - Singapore

Hi Martin and Bruno, We would like a slot for draft-xu-mpls-unified-source-routing-instruction on the SPRING working group agenda in Singapore. We want to present a piece of work that we are doing in MPLS. Best regards, Xiaohu (on behalf of co-authors) > -邮件原件- > 发件人: spring [mailto:s

[spring] 答复: MPLS Segment Routing in IP Networks

Hi Leonid, The UDP payload type should be indicated by the UDP destination port. For instance, if the payload is an MPLS packet, the UDP port is 6635 as specified in RFC7510. If the payload is an IP packet, the UDP port is TDB as specified in (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-intarea-ip-in-

[spring] 答复: 答复: 答复: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bryant-mpls-unified-ip-sr-01.txt

> -邮件原件- > 发件人: Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) > [mailto:wim.henderi...@nokia.com] > 发送时间: 2017年8月14日 15:18 > 收件人: Xuxiaohu; Uma Chunduri; adr...@olddog.co.uk; spring@ietf.org > 主题: Re: 答复: 答复: [spring] FW: New Version Notification for > draft-bryant-mpls

[spring] 答复: 答复: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bryant-mpls-unified-ip-sr-01.txt

Hi Wim, > -邮件原件- > 发件人: Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) > [mailto:wim.henderi...@nokia.com] > 发送时间: 2017年8月14日 15:03 > 收件人: Xuxiaohu; Uma Chunduri; adr...@olddog.co.uk; spring@ietf.org > 主题: Re: 答复: [spring] FW: New Version Notification for > draft-bryant-mpls

[spring] 答复: FW: New Version Notification for draft-bryant-mpls-unified-ip-sr-01.txt

Hi Wim, > -邮件原件- > 发件人: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Henderickx, Wim (Nokia > - BE/Antwerp) > 发送时间: 2017年8月14日 14:27 > 收件人: Uma Chunduri; adr...@olddog.co.uk; spring@ietf.org > 主题: Re: [spring] FW: New Version Notification for > draft-bryant-mpls-unified-ip-sr-01.txt > > Als

Re: [spring] FW: New Version Notification for draft-bryant-mpls-unified-ip-sr-01.txt

Adrian and Stewart， When you submitted the -00 version of this draft with my name being listed in the coauthor list but without my permission, I tolerated it so as to give face to you, although it had caused unnecessary confusion in the IETF, especially among the coauthors of draft-xu-mpls-uni

Re: [spring] FW: New Version Notification for draft-bryant-mpls-unified-ip-sr-01.txt

徐小虎 M：+86-13910161692 E：xuxia...@huawei.com 产品与解决方案-网络战略与业务发展部 发件人： Adrian Farrel 收件人： spring@ietf.org 主题： [spring] FW: New Version Notification for draft-bryant-mpls-unified-ip-sr-01.txt 时间： 2017-08-12 02:4

[spring] 答复: 答复: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-spring-ipv6-use-cases-10

[mailto:rras...@gmail.com] 代表 Robert Raszuk 发送时间: 2017年5月9日 12:21 收件人: Xuxiaohu 抄送: stefano previdi; Stewart Bryant; Alvaro Retana (aretana); draft-ietf-spring-ipv6-use-cases@ietf.org; gen-...@ietf.org; IETF Discussion; spring@ietf.org 主题: Re: [spring] 答复: Genart last call review of draft

[spring] 答复: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-spring-ipv6-use-cases-10

Hi Robert, Except the function indicated by all zeros, it does require mappings between functions, function indications and locators. Take tenant network function as an example☺ Best regards, Xiaohu 发件人: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Robert Raszuk 发送时间: 2017年5月8日 20:13 收件人: Stewar

[spring] FYI//转发: New Version Notification for draft-xu-mpls-unified-source-routing-instruction-00.txt

This draft may be interesting to folks involved in 6man and SPRING WG as well. Best regards, Xiaohu > -邮件原件- > 发件人: mpls [mailto:mpls-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Xuxiaohu > 发送时间: 2017年3月14日 10:31 > 收件人: m...@ietf.org > 主题: [mpls] 转发: New Version Notification for > draft-xu-m

Re: [spring] Clarification on the motivation of draft-xu-spring-islands-connection-over-ip-05

Hi Bruno, > -Original Message- > From: bruno.decra...@orange.com [mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2016 4:18 PM > To: Xuxiaohu > Cc: m...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org > Subject: RE: Clarification on the motivation of > draft-xu-spring-islan

Re: [spring] Clarification on the motivation of draft-xu-spring-islands-connection-over-ip-05

Hi Bruno, Thanks a lot for your detailed clarification. Please see my response inline. > -Original Message- > From: bruno.decra...@orange.com [mailto:bruno.decra...@orange.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2016 6:33 PM > To: Xuxiaohu > Cc: m...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.or

Re: [spring] Clarification on the motivation of draft-xu-spring-islands-connection-over-ip-05

gards, Xiaohu > -Original Message- > From: mpls [mailto:mpls-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Xuxiaohu > Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 11:37 PM > To: spring@ietf.org > Cc: m...@ietf.org > Subject: [mpls] Clarification on the motivation of > draft-xu-spring-islands-con

Re: [spring] [mpls] Clarification on the motivation of draft-xu-spring-islands-connection-over-ip-05

From: Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) [mailto:cpign...@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 8:23 AM To: Xuxiaohu Cc: Eric C Rosen; spring@ietf.org; m...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [mpls] Clarification on the motivation of draft-xu-spring-islands-connection-over-ip-05 On Apr 7, 2016, at 6:39 PM

Re: [spring] [mpls] Clarification on the motivation of draft-xu-spring-islands-connection-over-ip-05

> -Original Message- > From: Uma Chunduri [mailto:uma.chund...@ericsson.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 5:47 AM > To: Eric C Rosen; Xuxiaohu; spring@ietf.org > Cc: m...@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [mpls] Clarification on the motivation of > draft-xu-spring-islands-

Re: [spring] [mpls] Clarification on the motivation of draft-xu-spring-islands-connection-over-ip-05

Hi Eric, 发件人: Eric C Rosen [ero...@juniper.net] 发送时间: 2016年4月7日 4:48 收件人: Xuxiaohu; spring@ietf.org 抄送: m...@ietf.org 主题: Re: [mpls] Clarification on the motivation of draft-xu-spring-islands-connection-over-ip-05 On 4/6/2016 11:37 AM, Xuxiaohu wrote

Re: [spring] [mpls] Clarification on the motivation of draft-xu-spring-islands-connection-over-ip-05

[ero...@juniper.net] 发送时间: 2016年4月7日 4:48 收件人: Xuxiaohu; spring@ietf.org 抄送: m...@ietf.org 主题: Re: [mpls] Clarification on the motivation of draft-xu-spring-islands-connection-over-ip-05 On 4/6/2016 11:37 AM, Xuxiaohu wrote: > The situation in MPLS-SR is a little bit complex since the outgoing label

[spring] Clarification on the motivation of draft-xu-spring-islands-connection-over-ip-05

Hi all, According to suggestions from SPRING co-chairs, I would clarify the intention of this draft (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-spring-islands-connection-over-ip-05) as follows. If I understood the current MPLS-SR specification (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-segment-

Re: [spring] [sfc] New Version Notification for draft-xu-sfc-using-mpls-spring-02.txt

e- > From: Xuxiaohu > Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 8:49 AM > To: 'Jim Guichard (jguichar)'; Ron Parker > Cc: mpls at ietf.org; ; sfc at ietf.org > Subject: RE: [sfc] New Version Notification for > draft-xu-sfc-using-mpls-spring-02.txt > > Hi Jim, > > Underst

[spring] request to reconsider the new version of draft-xu-sfc-using-mpls-spring

e- > From: Xuxiaohu > Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 8:49 AM > To: 'Jim Guichard (jguichar)'; Ron Parker > Cc: mpls at ietf.org; ; sfc at ietf.org > Subject: RE: [sfc] New Version Notification for > draft-xu-sfc-using-mpls-spring-02.txt > > Hi Ji

Re: [spring] New Version Notification for draft-lw-spring-sid-allocation-01.txt

Hi Ting, IGP-SR is just another label distribution method. Therefore, just like LDP, it should not influence the best path selection result. Best regards, Xiaohu From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of liao.t...@zte.com.cn Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 4:14 PM To: Xuxiaohu

Re: [spring] New Version Notification for draft-lw-spring-sid-allocation-01.txt

Hi Ting, From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of liao.t...@zte.com.cn Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 3:10 PM To: Peter Psenak Cc: spring@ietf.org; rabah.gued...@orange.com; spring; Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) Subject: Re: [spring] New Version Notification for draft-lw-spring-si

Re: [spring] 答复: Re: New Version Notification for draft-lw-spring-sid-allocation-01.txt

Hi Ting From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of liao.t...@zte.com.cn Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 3:03 PM To: rabah.gued...@orange.com Cc: spring@ietf.org; spring; Stefano Previdi (sprevidi); Peter Psenak (ppsenak) Subject: [spring] 答复: Re: New Version Notification for draft-

Re: [spring] [sfc] New Version Notification for draft-xu-sfc-using-mpls-spring-02.txt

Hi Jim, I have remove those options which may cause changes to the MPLS architecture in the latest version (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-sfc-using-mpls-spring-03). Best regards, Xiaohu > -Original Message- > From: Xuxiaohu > Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 8:49 AM &

Re: [spring] [sfc] New Version Notification for draft-xu-sfc-using-mpls-spring-02.txt

Hi Jim, Understood. Best regards, Xiaohu > -Original Message- > From: Jim Guichard (jguichar) [mailto:jguic...@cisco.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 11:11 PM > To: Ron Parker; Xuxiaohu > Cc: m...@ietf.org; ; s...@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [sfc] New Version Notifi

Re: [spring] [sfc] New Version Notification for draft-xu-sfc-using-mpls-spring-02.txt

retrieve the label stack which has been stripped by that SFF before. Best regards, Xiaohu > -Original Message- > From: Ron Parker [mailto:ron_par...@affirmednetworks.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 12:41 AM > To: Xuxiaohu; s...@ietf.org; ; m...@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [s

Re: [spring] New Version Notification for draft-xu-sfc-using-mpls-spring-02.txt

., the NSH). Best regards, Xiaohu > -Original Message- > From: Xuxiaohu > Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 11:31 AM > To: s...@ietf.org; ''; m...@ietf.org > Subject: FW: New Version Notification for > draft-xu-sfc-using-mpls-spring-02.txt > > Hi all, >

[spring] FW: New Version Notification for draft-xu-sfc-using-mpls-spring-02.txt

M. Contreras; Xuxiaohu; Himanshu C. Shah; Xuxiaohu; > Himanshu Shah; Luis M. Contreras; Lizhenbin > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-xu-sfc-using-mpls-spring-02.txt > > > A new version of I-D, draft-xu-sfc-using-mpls-spring-02.txt > has been successfully submitted by Xi

[spring] FW: New Version Notification for draft-xu-spring-islands-connection-over-ip-04.txt

ssage- > From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] > Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 10:10 AM > To: Uma Chunduri; Luis M. Contreras; Robert Raszuk; Xuxiaohu; Luis M. > Contreras; Xuxiaohu; Uma Chunduri; Robert Raszuk > Subject: New Version Notification for > draf

[spring] FW: New Version Notification for draft-xu-spring-islands-connection-over-ip-03.txt

tf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:41 AM > To: Xuxiaohu; Robert Raszuk; Xuxiaohu; Uma Chunduri; Uma Chunduri; Robert > Raszuk > Subject: New Version Notification for > draft-xu-spring-islands-connection-over-ip-03.txt > > > A new version o

[spring] Do we really need such a diversity

Hi, As I had mentioned at the mic, the IPv6-SR-header draft proposes to use an ordered list of IPv6 addresses to represent an explicit path. In this way, there is no need for any IGP extension. That's fine although I don't know whether such a trade-off is much worthwhile (i.e., encapsulation ov

Re: [spring] [sfc] About the possibility of using MPLS source routing (i.e., MPLS-SPRING) mechanism for SFC//RE: SFC Honolulu meeting agenda

aohu From: Gregory Mirsky [mailto:gregory.mir...@ericsson.com] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 2:24 PM To: Xuxiaohu; Ron Parker Cc: m...@ietf.org; ; s...@ietf.org Subject: RE: [sfc] About the possibility of using MPLS source routing (i.e., MPLS-SPRING) mechanism for SFC//RE: SFC Honolulu meeting agenda

Re: [spring] [sfc] About the possibility of using MPLS source routing (i.e., MPLS-SPRING) mechanism for SFC//RE: SFC Honolulu meeting agenda

usage of the SPL and ESPL space (i.e., used as a protocol type identifier)? Best regards, Xiaohu From: Ron Parker [mailto:ron_par...@affirmednetworks.com] Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 4:45 AM To: Xuxiaohu Cc: s...@ietf.org; m...@ietf.org; Subject: Re: [sfc] About the possibility of using MPLS

[spring] About the possibility of using MPLS source routing (i.e., MPLS-SPRING) mechanism for SFC//RE: SFC Honolulu meeting agenda

4) how to convey metadata in an MPLS packet? This issue may be the same as issue 1. Any comments? Best regards, Xiaohu From: Jim Guichard (jguichar) [mailto:jguic...@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 8:15 PM To: Xuxiaohu; Thomas Narten Subject: Re: SFC Honolulu meeting agenda Hi Xi

Re: [spring] Request WG adoption polling//FW: The rationale of draft-xu-spring-islands-connection-over-ip

incremental deployment purpose and some special use cases and therefore it should be specified somewhere. Therefore we co-authors request you to issue a WG adoption poll on this draft. Thanks. Best regards, Xiaohu (on behalf of all co-authors) -Original Message- From: Xuxiaohu Sent: Monday

Re: [spring] Request WG adoption polling//FW: The rationale of draft-xu-spring-islands-connection-over-ip

; From: Xuxiaohu > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 11:59 AM > To: > Subject: Request WG adoption polling//FW: [spring] The rationale of > draft-xu-spring-islands-connection-over-ip > > Hi co-chairs, > > We have addressed all comments received so far in the following revision

[spring] Request WG adoption polling//FW: The rationale of draft-xu-spring-islands-connection-over-ip

: Xuxiaohu Cc: Subject: Re: [spring] The rationale of draft-xu-spring-islands-connection-over-ip Hi Xu, We discussed this work before, however I have a new question ... It is an informational draft so you relay on proper configuration of RS nodes in the islands. Note that today you may have

[spring] FW: New Version Notification for draft-xu-spring-islands-connection-over-ip-01.txt

FYI. Best regards, Xiaohu > -Original Message- > From: internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] > Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 10:56 AM > To: Uma Chunduri; Robert Raszuk; Siva Sivabalan; Xuxiaohu; Siva Sivabalan; > Xuxiaohu; Victor Lopezalvarez; Vict

Re: [spring] Comments on draft-li-mpls-global-label-usecases

> -Original Message- > From: Nobo Akiya (nobo) [mailto:n...@cisco.com] > Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 7:33 AM > To: Xuxiaohu; Lizhenbin; draft-li-mpls-global-label-useca...@tools.ietf.org > Cc: m...@ietf.org > Subject: RE: Comments on draft-li-mpls-global-label-useca

Re: [spring] SPRING MPLS and Entropy Label

Concur. Best regards, Xiaohu 发件人: mpls [mpls-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Kireeti Kompella [kire...@juniper.net] 发送时间: 2014年7月24日 20:12 收件人: Robert Raszuk 抄送: Kireeti Kompella; m...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org; draft-kini-mpls-spring-entropy-la...@tools.ietf.org 主题: R

[spring] Flexibility of SCH or NSH

Hi all, I have said the following word at this thread (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sfc/current/msg02172.html): I'm glad to see that the Service Path Header is decoupled from the Base Header of the NSH while the MD Type field is introduced. With such MD Type fie

Re: [spring] SPRING MPLS and Entropy Label

[stephane.litkow...@orange.com] 发送时间: 2014年7月22日 22:51 收件人: Xuxiaohu; Rob Shakir 抄送: m...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org; draft-kini-mpls-spring-entropy-la...@tools.ietf.org 主题: RE: [spring] SPRING MPLS and Entropy Label So let's find the best compromise ... but we can't stay stuck ... ---

Re: [spring] SPRING MPLS and Entropy Label

I personally don't believe there is any possibility of making that recommendation at present since each option is only applicalbe in a certain condition. Best regards, Xiaohu 发件人: spring [spring-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 stephane.litkow...@orange.com [stepha

[spring] 答复: SPRING MPLS and Entropy Label

Hi Rob, 发件人: spring [spring-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Rob Shakir [r...@rob.sh] 发送时间: 2014年7月21日 23:04 收件人: Xuxiaohu 抄送: m...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org; draft-kini-mpls-spring-entropy-la...@tools.ietf.org 主题: Re: [spring] SPRING MPLS and Entropy Label Hi

Re: [spring] SPRING MPLS and Entropy Label

Hi Rob, > In terms of discovery of the capabilities of a mid-point -- do we need to > consider how, in a multi-area network, we discover the capabilities of a > mid-point which might not have information about it leaked between areas? Did you mean that when propagating the capabilities TLV/sub

Re: [spring] How to carry metadata/context in an MPLS packet

attached to the MPLS packet, it seems that you still need some way to indicate the presence of that “reference_id” in the MPLS packet. Best regards, Xiaohu From: rras...@gmail.com [mailto:rras...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Robert Raszuk Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 3:27 PM To: Xuxiaohu; s...@ietf.org

Re: [spring] How to carry metadata/context in an MPLS packet

> -Original Message- > From: Xuxiaohu > Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 2:33 PM > To: 'l.w...@surrey.ac.uk'; m...@ietf.org > Cc: spring@ietf.org; s...@ietf.org > Subject: RE: How to carry metadata/context in an MPLS packet > > > > > -Original

Re: [spring] How to carry metadata/context in an MPLS packet

> -Original Message- > From: l.w...@surrey.ac.uk [mailto:l.w...@surrey.ac.uk] > Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 11:22 AM > To: Xuxiaohu; m...@ietf.org > Cc: spring@ietf.org; s...@ietf.org > Subject: RE: How to carry metadata/context in an MPLS packet > > No, my &qu

Re: [spring] How to carry metadata/context in an MPLS packet

The presence of metadata within an MPLS packet must be indicated in the encapsulation. I think that's the "why" you may want to know. Best regards, Xiaohu > -Original Message- > From: l.w...@surrey.ac.uk [mailto:l.w...@surrey.ac.uk] > Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014

[spring] How to carry metadata/context in an MPLS packet

Hi all, I'm now considering how to carry metadata/context in an MPLS packet. I just noticed that draft-guichard-mpls-metadata-00 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-guichard-mpls-metadata-00#page-6) proposes a way to carry metadata/context in an MPLS packet (see below): "3. Metadata Channel Hea

Re: [spring] Taking the MPLS label stack representing an SFP as an overlay=Transport Derived SFF

/draft-xu-spring-pce-based-sfc-arch-01 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-pce-sr-sfc-01 Best regards, Xiaohu > -Original Message- > From: sfc [mailto:sfc-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Xuxiaohu > Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 10:12 AM > To: Ron Parker > Cc: ; s...@ietf.org

[spring] Taking the MPLS label stack representing an SFP as an overlay=Transport Derived SFF

(Note that I changed the subject since this is a totally different topic) Hi Ron, I agree there are some cases where the underlay network is not MPLS-capable. In those cases, you could actually just take the MPLS label stack which represents a given SFP (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-spri

Re: [spring] The rationale of draft-xu-spring-islands-connection-over-ip

:rras...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Robert Raszuk Sent: Friday, July 04, 2014 5:29 PM To: Xuxiaohu Cc: Subject: Re: [spring] The rationale of draft-xu-spring-islands-connection-over-ip Hi Xu, We discussed this work before, however I have a new question ... It is an informational draft so you relay on p

[spring] The rationale of draft-xu-spring-islands-connection-over-ip

Hi all, This draft (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-spring-islands-connection-over-ip-00) describes a use case about interconnecting spring islands over IP networks. The rationale for this draft is as follows: Suppose LSR A and LSR B are separated by an IP network. Assume LSR A receives

Re: [spring] FW: New Version Notification for draft-xu-spring-sfc-use-case-01.txt

> -Original Message- > From: rras...@gmail.com [mailto:rras...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Robert > Raszuk > Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2014 2:00 PM > To: Xuxiaohu > Cc: > Subject: Re: [spring] FW: New Version Notification for > draft-xu-spring-sfc-use-case-01.txt >

Re: [spring] FW: New Version Notification for draft-xu-spring-sfc-use-case-01.txt

Hi Robert, > -Original Message- > From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Robert Raszuk > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 8:06 PM > To: Xuxiaohu > Cc: > Subject: Re: [spring] FW: New Version Notification for > draft-xu-spring-sfc-use-case-01.txt &g

Re: [spring] FW: New Version Notification for draft-xu-spring-sfc-use-case-01.txt

Hi Robert, Thanks a lot for your comments. Please see my response inline. > -Original Message- > From: rras...@gmail.com [mailto:rras...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Robert > Raszuk > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 2:59 PM > To: Xuxiaohu > Cc: > Subject: Re: [sp

[spring] FW: New Version Notification for draft-xu-spring-sfc-use-case-01.txt

4 AM > To: Lizhenbin; Xuxiaohu; Himanshu C. Shah; Xuxiaohu; Himanshu Shah; > Lizhenbin > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-xu-spring-sfc-use-case-01.txt > > > A new version of I-D, draft-xu-spring-sfc-use-case-01.txt > has been successfully submitted by Xiaohu Xu and po

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-martin-spring-segment-routing-ipv6-use-cases

> -Original Message- > From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Eric Vyncke > (evyncke) > Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 5:48 PM > To: Hannes Gredler; Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) > Cc: Yakov Rekhter; ; John G. Scudder; Alvaro Retana (aretana) > Subject: Re: [spring] WG Adopt

Re: [spring] [Isis-wg] Request for WG adoption of draft-xu-isis-mpls-elc-00

6790 and something else (e.g., the capability of accessing the max label stack deepth) Best regards, Xiaohu > -Original Message- > From: Xuxiaohu > Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 10:37 AM > To: 'stephane.litkow...@orange.com'; Hannes Gredler > Cc: isis-cha...@t

Re: [spring] [Isis-wg] Request for WG adoption of draft-xu-isis-mpls-elc-00

> -Original Message- > From: stephane.litkow...@orange.com [mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 9:34 PM > To: Hannes Gredler; Xuxiaohu > Cc: isis-cha...@tools.ietf.org; draft-xu-isis-mpls-...@tools.ietf.org; > isis...@ietf.org list; &g

Re: [spring] [Isis-wg] Request for WG adoption of draft-xu-isis-mpls-elc-00

e way that can be supported by RFC6790, IMHO. Best regards, Xiaohu > -Original Message- > From: Isis-wg [mailto:isis-wg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hannes Gredler > Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 5:47 PM > To: Xuxiaohu > Cc: isis-cha...@tools.ietf.org; ; > draft-xu-

[spring] 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: draft-gredler-spring-mpls-05.txt as SPRING WG document

> -邮件原件- > 发件人: rras...@gmail.com [mailto:rras...@gmail.com] 代表 Robert Raszuk > 发送时间: 2014年5月22日 11:10 > 收件人: Xuxiaohu > 抄送: Yakov Rekhter; spring@ietf.org; Hannes Gredler; John G. Scudder; Alvaro > Retana (aretana) > 主题: Re: 答复: 答复: [spring] 答复: 答复: 答复: > draf

[spring] 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: draft-gredler-spring-mpls-05.txt as SPRING WG document

> -邮件原件- > 发件人: rras...@gmail.com [mailto:rras...@gmail.com] 代表 Robert Raszuk > 发送时间: 2014年5月22日 9:33 > 收件人: Xuxiaohu > 抄送: Yakov Rekhter; spring@ietf.org; Hannes Gredler; John G. Scudder; Alvaro > Retana (aretana) > 主题: Re: 答复: [spring] 答复: 答复: 答复: draft-gredler-

[spring] 答复: 答复: 答复: 答复: draft-gredler-spring-mpls-05.txt as SPRING WG document

word, when receiving a packet with top label of either 1033 or 44, that top label would be swapped to 33. Best regards, Xiaohu > -邮件原件- > 发件人: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Robert Raszuk > 发送时间: 2014年5月21日 22:08 > 收件人: Xuxiaohu > 抄送: Yakov Rekhter; spring@i

[spring] 答复: 答复: 答复: draft-gredler-spring-mpls-05.txt as SPRING WG document

> -邮件原件- > 发件人: rras...@gmail.com [mailto:rras...@gmail.com] 代表 Robert Raszuk > 发送时间: 2014年5月21日 16:12 > 收件人: Xuxiaohu > 抄送: Yakov Rekhter; Hannes Gredler; spring@ietf.org; John G. Scudder; Alvaro > Retana (aretana) > 主题: Re: [spring] 答复: 答复: draft-gredler-spring-mpl

[spring] 答复: 答复: draft-gredler-spring-mpls-05.txt as SPRING WG document

ive a concrete example to illustrate why the forwarding result is rather poor? Best regards, Xiaohu > -邮件原件- > 发件人: rras...@gmail.com [mailto:rras...@gmail.com] 代表 Robert Raszuk > 发送时间: 2014年5月21日 15:41 > 收件人: Xuxiaohu > 抄送: Hannes Gredler; spring@ietf.org; Alvaro Retana (aretana

[spring] 答复: draft-gredler-spring-mpls-05.txt as SPRING WG document

Robert, > -邮件原件- > 发件人: rras...@gmail.com [mailto:rras...@gmail.com] 代表 Robert Raszuk > 发送时间: 2014年5月21日 15:25 > 收件人: Xuxiaohu > 抄送: Hannes Gredler; Yakov Rekhter; spring@ietf.org; Alvaro Retana (aretana); > John G. Scudder > 主题: Re: [spring] draft-gredler-spring-mpl

Re: [spring] draft-gredler-spring-mpls-05.txt as SPRING WG document

Hi Robert, > -邮件原件- > 发件人: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Robert Raszuk > 发送时间: 2014年5月20日 23:27 > 收件人: Hannes Gredler > 抄送: Yakov Rekhter; spring@ietf.org; John G. Scudder; Alvaro Retana (aretana) > 主题: Re: [spring] draft-gredler-spring-mpls-05.txt as SPRING WG document > > H

Re: [spring] [sfc] Fragmentation and Path MTU text in nvo3 dataplane reqts draft

> -邮件原件- > 发件人: sfc [mailto:sfc-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Linda Dunbar > 发送时间: 2014年5月15日 6:03 > 收件人: Black, David; ts...@ietf.org; tsv-a...@ietf.org > 抄送: s...@ietf.org > 主题: Re: [sfc] Fragmentation and Path MTU text in nvo3 dataplane reqts draft > > I think that the "fragmentation and path

[spring] 答复: [sfc] Why Transport Dependence is deemed as a problem?//re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-problem-statement-04.txt

Hi Robert, 发件人: rras...@gmail.com [mailto:rras...@gmail.com] 代表 Robert Raszuk 发送时间: 2014年4月21日 18:29 收件人: Xuxiaohu 抄送: Ron Parker; s...@ietf.org; spring@ietf.org 主题: Re: [sfc] Why Transport Dependence is deemed as a problem?//re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-problem-statement-04.txt Hi Xu, How

Re: [spring] [sfc] Why Transport Dependence is deemed as a problem?//re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-problem-statement-04.txt

Hi Ron, Thanks for your comments. Please see my response inline. > -邮件原件- > 发件人: sfc [mailto:sfc-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Ron Parker > 发送时间: 2014年4月18日 20:43 > 收件人: Xuxiaohu; s...@ietf.org > 抄送: spring@ietf.org > 主题: Re: [sfc] Why Transport Dependence is deemed as a

[spring] Why Transport Dependence is deemed as a problem?//re: [sfc] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-problem-statement-04.txt

Hi all, It said in section 2.6. Transport Dependence of the PS draft: "Service functions can and will be deployed in networks with a range of transports, including under and overlays. The coupling of service functions to topology requires service functions to support many transport e

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-martin-spring-segment-routing-ipv6-use-cases

> -邮件原件- > 发件人: rras...@gmail.com [mailto:rras...@gmail.com] 代表 Robert Raszuk > 发送时间: 2014年3月28日 17:49 > 收件人: Xuxiaohu > 抄送: Yakov Rekhter; spring@ietf.org; Alvaro Retana, (aretana) > 主题: Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for > draft-martin-spring-segment-routing-ipv6

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-martin-spring-segment-routing-ipv6-use-cases

> -邮件原件- > 发件人: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Robert Raszuk > 发送时间: 2014年3月28日 16:38 > 收件人: Xuxiaohu > 抄送: Yakov Rekhter; spring@ietf.org; Alvaro Retana, (aretana) > 主题: Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for > draft-martin-spring-segment-routing-ipv6

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-martin-spring-segment-routing-ipv6-use-cases

Hi Robert, I think Yakov’s point could be interpreted as “you can use MPLS-SR in conjunction with MPLS-over-GRE to realize the goal that you have mentioned, i.e., only those 4 out of those 1000 nodes need to support segment routing. None of the transit nodes needs to be SR aware”. For more deta

Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for draft-martin-spring-segment-routing-ipv6-use-cases

> -邮件原件- > 发件人: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Stefano Previdi (sprevidi) > 发送时间: 2014年3月26日 17:50 > 收件人: Yakov Rekhter > 抄送: Alvaro Retana (aretana); > 主题: Re: [spring] WG Adoption Call for > draft-martin-spring-segment-routing-ipv6-use-cases > > Hi Yakov, > > thanks for t