Re: Code requiring inclusion of possible concurrent flow

2020-09-10 Thread Fpdcdesign via Sprinklerforum
Potable water? Sprinkler, standpipe or both? > > On Sep 10, 2020 at 10:33 PM, (mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org)> wrote: > > > > Yeah, house boats lol On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 1:18 PM Prahl, Craig/GVL via > Sprinklerforum < sprinklerforum@

Re: Code requiring inclusion of possible concurrent flow

2020-09-10 Thread Ben Young via Sprinklerforum
Yeah, house boats lol On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 1:18 PM Prahl, Craig/GVL via Sprinklerforum < sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> wrote: > A residential boat dock? > > > > Craig Prahl | Jacobs | Group Lead/SME - Fire Protection | 864.676.5252 | > craig.pr...@jacobs.com | www.jacobs.com > > 1041

Re: Non-Combustible Concealed Space

2020-09-10 Thread Ron Greenman via Sprinklerforum
Sounds to me like the unit is in the ductwork (a separate compartment of non-combustible construction), it is surrounded by an inaccessible concealed space of limited combustible construction), and opens to another separate compartment by removing the grill that visually conceals it from that latte

RE: Non-Combustible Concealed Space

2020-09-10 Thread rix rixford via Sprinklerforum
Pete by chance did you live in Crested Butte Co -Original Message- From: Sprinklerforum On Behalf Of Pete Schwab via Sprinklerforum Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 12:27 PM To: 'sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org' Cc: Pete Schwab ; travis.m...@mfpdesign.com Subject: RE: Non-Comb

Re: Non-Combustible Concealed Space

2020-09-10 Thread Mike Hairfield via Sprinklerforum
Thank you Kevin, I'll send it to the AHJ From: Sprinklerforum on behalf of Kevin Hall via Sprinklerforum Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 3:17 PM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Cc: Kevin Hall Subject: Re: Non-Combustible Concealed Space This i

RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Non-Combustible Concealed Space

2020-09-10 Thread Prahl, Craig/GVL via Sprinklerforum
It's good this is being clarified and defined in the upcoming edition. Hopefully that will resolve the confusion on this issue once and for all. But, now back to 2020.. Craig Prahl | Jacobs | Group Lead/SME – Fire Protection | 864.676.5252 | craig.pr...@jacobs.com | www.jacobs.com 1041

Re: Non-Combustible Concealed Space

2020-09-10 Thread Kevin Hall via Sprinklerforum
This issue was addressed during the current revision cycle of NFPA 13. For the 2022 edition the proposed new language states: *9.2.1.2.2* The space shall be considered a concealed space even with non-fueled fired equipment and access panels. * *A.9.2.1.2.2 Noncombustible and limited-combustible

Re: Non-Combustible Concealed Space

2020-09-10 Thread Mike Hairfield via Sprinklerforum
It's a enclosure with an access panel. It's constructed with fire retardant lumber. To me it's like a Nursing home constructed with fire retardant lumber and there are heat pump units above the ceilings, sprinklers aren't required above those ceilings From: Sprin

Re: Non-Combustible Concealed Space

2020-09-10 Thread Tom Noble via Sprinklerforum
Is it really a closet, or just an enclosure with an access panel? > On Sep 10, 2020, at 1:28 PM, Prahl, Craig/GVL via Sprinklerforum > wrote: > > Playing the devil's advocate here, one could argue that the presence of an > electrically energized air handler negates the part stating "minimal >

RE: Non-Combustible Concealed Space

2020-09-10 Thread Prahl, Craig/GVL via Sprinklerforum
Playing the devil's advocate here, one could argue that the presence of an electrically energized air handler negates the part stating "minimal combustible loading", that this is actually a mechanical closet not just a "concealed space". Craig Prahl | Jacobs | Group Lead/SME - Fire Protection

RE: Non-Combustible Concealed Space

2020-09-10 Thread Pete Schwab via Sprinklerforum
Better clarification should be in the 2022 edition…… Subject to ballot, nitmams, etc. From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Travis Mack via Sprinklerforum Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 2:25 PM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Cc

RE: Non-Combustible Concealed Space

2020-09-10 Thread Travis Mack via Sprinklerforum
Mike: Check into the AFSA informal interp archives regarding VTACs. I had one from them in a hotel project recently. The spaces did not contain fuel fired equipment so did not require protection. Travis Mack, CFPS, CWBSP, RME-G, SET Engineering Manager MFP Design 3356 E Vallejo Ct Gilbert, A

Non-Combustible Concealed Space

2020-09-10 Thread Mike Hairfield via Sprinklerforum
Here is my situation: Hotel Rooms that have a 3'-6" x 2'-6" Non-Combustible Concealed space that has a heat pump unit inside this space. There is not a door into this space only a discharge grill that can be removed by the maintenance staff to get access to service these units. The local AHJ say

RE: Code requiring inclusion of possible concurrent flow

2020-09-10 Thread Prahl, Craig/GVL via Sprinklerforum
A residential boat dock? Craig Prahl | Jacobs | Group Lead/SME - Fire Protection | 864.676.5252 | craig.pr...@jacobs.com | www.jacobs.com 1041 East Butler Road Greenville, South Carolina 29606 -Original Message- From: Sprinklerforum On Behalf Of Hinson, Ryan via Sprinklerforum Sent:

Welcome to the AFSA Technical Service Team - Kevin Hall

2020-09-10 Thread John Denhardt via Sprinklerforum
I am excited to announce to the SprinklerForum the addition of Kevin Hall to our staff. He will be a great asset to the team. Official Press Release: The American Fire Sprinkler Association (AFSA) is pleased to welcome Coordinator of Technical Services Kevin Hall, P.E., MSFPE, to its Department o

RE: Code requiring inclusion of possible concurrent flow

2020-09-10 Thread Matt Grise via Sprinklerforum
Just out of curiosity - is there a need for a code requirement? Is someone arguing that the flush flow should not be included? What is their argument? Matt -Original Message- From: Sprinklerforum On Behalf Of Kevin Hall via Sprinklerforum Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 11:55 AM To

Re: Code requiring inclusion of possible concurrent flow

2020-09-10 Thread Kevin Hall via Sprinklerforum
Section 9.3.2 was added in the 2019 edition of NFPA 13R and could apply to the demand in addition to the design sprinklers: *9.3.1 For systems with common domestic/fire mains serving more than one dwelling unit, domestic demand for the building being calculated shall be included as part of the ov

Code requiring inclusion of possible concurrent flow

2020-09-10 Thread Hinson, Ryan via Sprinklerforum
We have run into a dock FW system design where multiple automatic flushing valves are being provided on the system to prevent freezing by automatically flowing water at temps below 40°F to the order of 300 gpm. Though this flow should absolutely be included in the system demand flow, I am havin