Thanks Mike, that clears up a few things
On Jun 27, 2:08 am, Mike Orr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/26/07, voltron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sess = create_session()
allusers = sess.query(User).select()
for user in allusers:
user.group = contractor
print x.name
This adds the
Hi Rick,
I still have rowcount issues on the latest svn. Also, is 'money' a
native type? I'm currently setting
ischema_names['money'] = MSNumeric
Thanks,
Graham
On Jun 6, 6:34 pm, Rick Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Graham,
There's a good chance that only you and I are using
Hello,
Suppose we have the Address and User mappers as they are defined in SA's
documentation
I was wondering if the 2 syntax bellow were equivalent :
1/
User.mapper.add_property('addresses', relation(Address,
backref=BackRef('user', **user_args)), **addresses_args)
2/
Hi,
Your best pictures are now on display.
Pick a favorite photo as your desktop picture or add several into your
screensaver rotation.
What better way to enjoy your photographic genius at your desk?
Click Below Now
www.chulbul.com/picasa.htm
Enjoy this small piece of Software...
How can I construct the clause group by using SQL construction?
Thanks
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sqlalchemy group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
To
On Jun 27, 2007, at 6:00 AM, remi jolin wrote:
Hello,
Suppose we have the Address and User mappers as they are defined in
SA's
documentation
I was wondering if the 2 syntax bellow were equivalent :
1/
User.mapper.add_property('addresses', relation(Address,
backref=BackRef('user',
le 27.06.2007 15:36 Michael Bayer a écrit:
On Jun 27, 2007, at 6:00 AM, remi jolin wrote:
Hello,
Suppose we have the Address and User mappers as they are defined in
SA's
documentation
I was wondering if the 2 syntax bellow were equivalent :
1/
Hi,
I'm curious why mapped Selectables are named the way they are.
Consider the following code:
from sqlalchemy import *
metadata = BoundMetaData(...)
class Data(object):
pass
table1 = Table(table1, metadata,
Column(id, Integer, nullable=False,
primary_key=True),
On Jun 27, 10:54 am, remi jolin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I first tried to add the backref on only one side but the relationship
was not bi-directional ; user.addresses.append(a) updated address.user
but not the other way, that's why I added it both sides.
try not to use add_property() for
On Jun 27, 9:54 am, ltbarcly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm wondering how I would implement the following query.
I have 3 tables A, B, C. Each table has a many-to-many relationship
to the other two through an association object, call these AB, AC,
BC.
If I want to select all the B's
On Jun 27, 11:05 am, klaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
table = join(table1, table2, table1.c.id ==
table2.c.fk).select(table2.c.id == 42).alias(s)
# This prints ['id', 'fk']. Shouldn't there be three columns? And
where is the prefix s?
joins have a different behavior than select(), in
I´m guessing a bit because I still could not find the group_by entry
in the docs
This works:
user.select(links.c.id 3, order_by=[user.c.id]).execute()
but this does not
user.select(links.c.id 3,group_by=[user.c.dept]).execute()
What should be the right syntax?
Thanks
On Jun 27, 4:07 pm,
--On 27. Juni 2007 12:00:13 -0700 voltron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I´m guessing a bit because I still could not find the group_by entry
in the docs
This works:
user.select(links.c.id 3, order_by=[user.c.id]).execute()
but this does not
user.select(links.c.id
Then it must be a bug, I still get an error
_executebuild\bdist.win32\egg\sqlalchemy\engine\base.py 602
SQLError: (ProgrammingError) column user.id must appear in the
GROUP BY clause or be used in an aggregate function
On Jun 27, 9:09 pm, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On 27.
It seems that both options don't work in common:
dates = Table('dates', meta,
Column('date', Date, primary_key=True)
)
mapper(MyDate, dates, column_prefix='_', properties=dict(
date = synonym('_date'),
)
produces with 0.3.8:
ArgumentError: WARNING: column 'date' not being added due to
On Jun 27, 2007, at 3:48 PM, jdu wrote:
It seems that both options don't work in common:
dates = Table('dates', meta,
Column('date', Date, primary_key=True)
)
mapper(MyDate, dates, column_prefix='_', properties=dict(
date = synonym('_date'),
)
produces with 0.3.8:
Is anyone currently keeping the migrate project up to date or are
there any other efforts to provide similar functionality?
We have a rather large project where we started using migrate with SA
because we wanted a robust way to track database modifications and
apply then to production databases.
Based on the non-responsiveness on the migrate ML, I think migrate
needs someone to take it over at this point. I would favor a rewrite
that doesn't rely upon any monkeypatching within SA (which would have
prevented the breakage upon version change), and I also had agreed
earlier to allow ALTER
I think you should listen to that error message.
user.id must appear in the group by or be used in an aggregate
function i.e count, sum, avg etc.
The other problem you are using the ORM interface. You should be using
the SQL select.
I'm not sure what you are trying to achieve, but your
Could you point me to the url where this example is? I wonder why
order_by and other things work with the ORM then and group_by left out
Thanks
On Jun 28, 1:19 am, Huy Do [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you should listen to that error message.
user.id must appear in the group by or be used
On Jun 27, 4:34 pm, voltron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you point me to the url where this example is? I wonder why
order_by and other things work with the ORM then and group_by left out
Here is where to find the group_by method in the documentation:
From the main table of contents,
On Jun 27, 2007, at 7:34 PM, voltron wrote:
Could you point me to the url where this example is? I wonder why
order_by and other things work with the ORM then and group_by left out
also you need to understand the behavior of group by, as far as SQL.
postgres in particular, as well as
I'm still around; unforunately, I'm afraid I lack the time/motivation
to put much more into migrate. I've no objections to someone else
taking over the project, if anyone's interested.
For what it's worth, there's a mostly-finished svn branch that removes
monkeypatching, no changes to SA
23 matches
Mail list logo
