On Nov 23, 2007, at 6:30 PM, Rick Morrison wrote:
> Is there any way to configure logging on an engine instance after
> the engine has been instantiated?
>
> it looks to me as if the engine init checks the module logger status
> and sets a couple of flags "_should_log_info" and
> "_should_
hei Michael -
On Nov 23, 2007 2:41 PM, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hey Roger -
>
> assuming this has been confirmed with version 0.4.1 you can add a trac
> ticket for this.
>
> - mike
It's done: #878
Cheers,
Roger
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You rec
Is there any way to configure logging on an engine instance after the engine
has been instantiated?
it looks to me as if the engine init checks the module logger status and
sets a couple of flags "_should_log_info" and "_should_log_debug". (I'm
guessing these are there to keep the logging function
On Nov 23, 2007, at 12:53 PM, lur ibargutxi wrote:
> my problem is that in my local configuration I have SQLAlchemy0.4.0
> and collective.lead and my aplication work very well but when i try
> to do the same thing in the server I have this problem:
>
> ArgumentError: Error determining primar
On Nov 23, 2007, at 6:11 AM, Pierre-Yves Strub wrote:
>
> Hi again,
>
> Now using SQLAlchemy r3811, using the code at
> http://pastie.caboo.se/121148
>
> In this case, the merge operation do some lazy loading. When
> no inheritance is in use, the behaviour is not visible
On Nov 23, 2007 2:41 PM, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hey Roger -
>
> assuming this has been confirmed with version 0.4.1 you can add a trac
> ticket for this.
I am not in front of a machine with SA installed, but my coworker told
me it was 0.4.1...
I'll test it at home and add a
my problem is that in my local configuration I have SQLAlchemy0.4.0 and
collective.lead and my aplication work very well but when i try to do the
same thing in the server I have this problem:
ArgumentError: Error determining primary and/or secondary join for
relationship 'Areas.idareatype2 (Areaty
hey Roger -
assuming this has been confirmed with version 0.4.1 you can add a trac
ticket for this.
- mike
On Nov 23, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Roger Demetrescu wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> A coworker has doing some experiments with deferred column loading and
> noticed that SA doesn't raise any excepti
On Nov 23, 2007, at 11:08 AM, lur ibargutxi wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I made an aplication in my local machine but when I tried to do the
> same in the server I had this problem:
>
> Module Python expression "view.indicators()", line 1, in
> Module Products.odr.lugabe_db.browser.sql, line 23, in ind
Is it possible that your mapped class has a regular Python property
with the same name as a mapped relation?
Klaus
On 23 Nov., 17:08, "lur ibargutxi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I made an aplication in my local machine but when I tried to do the same in
> the server I had this problem:
Hi all,
A coworker has doing some experiments with deferred column loading and
noticed that SA doesn't raise any exception when defer(), undefer() or
undefer_group() are called with an invalid column ou group name.
In other words, if you try to follow the example from:
http://www.sqlalchemy.org
Hi!
I made an aplication in my local machine but when I tried to do the same in
the server I had this problem:
Module Python expression "view.indicators()", line 1, in
Module Products.odr.lugabe_db.browser.sql, line 23, in indicators
Module Products.odr.lugabe_db.query, line 48, in first_gro
Hi again,
Now using SQLAlchemy r3811, using the code at
http://pastie.caboo.se/121148
In this case, the merge operation do some lazy loading. When
no inheritance is in use, the behaviour is not visible since the lazy
loaded instance are already merged in the session (b
Hi,
Works like a charm for me now :) Thank you !
On Nov 23, 2007 6:37 AM, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The first bug is that the merge() dont_load operation was not
> completing all the necessary housekeeping on the newly generated copy
> of the instance, such that
On Nov 23, 2007, at 3:59 AM, imgrey wrote:
>
> I was thinking to change isolation level in fact.
>
> But first, I don't know how to do this with sqlalchemy, second, with
> default isolation level commits should work properly weather or not
> something were inserted or updated during commit and t
On Nov 22, 2007, at 1:45 AM, imgrey wrote:
>
> Good Day sqlalchemy.
>
> I was searching, but didn't found a way to delete records from db not
> executing selection first.
>
> So, how to represent this SQL statement in slqalchemy ORM :
> """ DELETE FROM a WHERE b = c """ ?
>
just execute the SQL
I was thinking to change isolation level in fact.
But first, I don't know how to do this with sqlalchemy, second, with
default isolation level commits should work properly weather or not
something were inserted or updated during commit and third, I was
using nested transaction like this :
transa
Fine with me. ;-)
Klaus
On Nov 23, 6:37 am, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there -
>
> there are actually two bugs here, the second one is revealed after
> repairing the first.
>
> The first bug is that the merge() dont_load operation was not
> completing all the necessary housek
18 matches
Mail list logo
