I was thinking to change isolation level in fact.
But first, I don't know how to do this with sqlalchemy, second, with
default isolation level commits should work properly weather or not
something were inserted or updated during commit and third, I was
using nested transaction like this :
Fine with me. ;-)
Klaus
On Nov 23, 6:37 am, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there -
there are actually two bugs here, the second one is revealed after
repairing the first.
The first bug is that the merge() dont_load operation was not
completing all the necessary housekeeping
Hi again,
Now using SQLAlchemy r3811, using the code at
http://pastie.caboo.se/121148
In this case, the merge operation do some lazy loading. When
no inheritance is in use, the behaviour is not visible since the lazy
loaded instance are already merged in the session
Hi all,
A coworker has doing some experiments with deferred column loading and
noticed that SA doesn't raise any exception when defer(), undefer() or
undefer_group() are called with an invalid column ou group name.
In other words, if you try to follow the example from:
On Nov 23, 2007 2:41 PM, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hey Roger -
assuming this has been confirmed with version 0.4.1 you can add a trac
ticket for this.
I am not in front of a machine with SA installed, but my coworker told
me it was 0.4.1...
I'll test it at home and add a
On Nov 23, 2007, at 12:53 PM, lur ibargutxi wrote:
my problem is that in my local configuration I have SQLAlchemy0.4.0
and collective.lead and my aplication work very well but when i try
to do the same thing in the server I have this problem:
ArgumentError: Error determining primary
Is there any way to configure logging on an engine instance after the engine
has been instantiated?
it looks to me as if the engine init checks the module logger status and
sets a couple of flags _should_log_info and _should_log_debug. (I'm
guessing these are there to keep the logging function
On Nov 23, 2007, at 6:30 PM, Rick Morrison wrote:
Is there any way to configure logging on an engine instance after
the engine has been instantiated?
it looks to me as if the engine init checks the module logger status
and sets a couple of flags _should_log_info and
hei Michael -
On Nov 23, 2007 2:41 PM, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hey Roger -
assuming this has been confirmed with version 0.4.1 you can add a trac
ticket for this.
- mike
It's done: #878
Cheers,
Roger
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
my problem is that in my local configuration I have SQLAlchemy0.4.0 and
collective.lead and my aplication work very well but when i try to do the
same thing in the server I have this problem:
ArgumentError: Error determining primary and/or secondary join for
relationship 'Areas.idareatype2
hey Roger -
assuming this has been confirmed with version 0.4.1 you can add a trac
ticket for this.
- mike
On Nov 23, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Roger Demetrescu wrote:
Hi all,
A coworker has doing some experiments with deferred column loading and
noticed that SA doesn't raise any exception
On Nov 23, 2007, at 11:08 AM, lur ibargutxi wrote:
Hi!
I made an aplication in my local machine but when I tried to do the
same in the server I had this problem:
Module Python expression view.indicators(), line 1, in expression
Module Products.odr.lugabe_db.browser.sql, line 23, in
Hi!
I made an aplication in my local machine but when I tried to do the same in
the server I had this problem:
Module Python expression view.indicators(), line 1, in expression
Module Products.odr.lugabe_db.browser.sql, line 23, in indicators
Module Products.odr.lugabe_db.query, line 48, in
On Nov 23, 2007, at 3:59 AM, imgrey wrote:
I was thinking to change isolation level in fact.
But first, I don't know how to do this with sqlalchemy, second, with
default isolation level commits should work properly weather or not
something were inserted or updated during commit and third,
On Nov 22, 2007, at 1:45 AM, imgrey wrote:
Good Day sqlalchemy.
I was searching, but didn't found a way to delete records from db not
executing selection first.
So, how to represent this SQL statement in slqalchemy ORM :
DELETE FROM a WHERE b = c ?
just execute the SQL directly,
On Nov 23, 2007, at 6:11 AM, Pierre-Yves Strub wrote:
Hi again,
Now using SQLAlchemy r3811, using the code at
http://pastie.caboo.se/121148
In this case, the merge operation do some lazy loading. When
no inheritance is in use, the behaviour is not visible since
Is it possible that your mapped class has a regular Python property
with the same name as a mapped relation?
Klaus
On 23 Nov., 17:08, lur ibargutxi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I made an aplication in my local machine but when I tried to do the same in
the server I had this problem:
17 matches
Mail list logo
