Just a side note, is the pool code thread safe?
i.e. no two threads would possibly checkout the same connection at any
point in time?
On Apr 25, 12:21 pm, Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
only if youre leaving dangling ResultProxys opened with pending
results, which should be a fairly
Hi Michael,
Thanks for your persistence :)
I've searched through my app, we don't seem to have any calls to
fetchone(), so I'm not sure what else to look for, but I'll try to do
some debugging with ResultProxys, see if that leads to any possible
answers.
On a side note, in our Pylons
I am investigating the use of the declarative extension. It looks
very attractive, but I have a problem...
I have a large project that is using the standard methods of
configuring tables and mappers. More specifically, there is a single
method in my domain package that is called once the
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:24:10 -0400
Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 27, 2008, at 7:39 AM, crybaby wrote:
Correct me if I am wrong, as of right now, relationship between
multiple db shards, like sorting, grouping and joins have to be done
in application level.
that is
On Apr 27, 2008, at 2:55 AM, Esceo wrote:
Just a side note, is the pool code thread safe?
i.e. no two threads would possibly checkout the same connection at any
point in time?
we're pretty confident its completely threadsafe as of 0.3.11, we have
several different kinds of tests for its
On Apr 27, 2008, at 8:25 AM, Allen Bierbaum wrote:
The problem that as I understand it, to use declarative, you can't
import an module that defines a table-based object until after some
initialization code has been run to connect to a database and create a
'Base' class for the declarative
On Apr 27, 2008, at 5:04 PM, Kyle Schaffrick wrote:
partial = partial + list(...)
The bits inside that list() calls up to Query.instances for each shard
in the for loop, which seems to return an iterator.
Assuming the desired ordering can be figured out from that spot, and a
python
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:23:24 -0400
Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But yes its probably how that section should be done anyway so that
ShardedQuery so that the iterative framework provided by
iterate_instances() (this method would need to be used instead of
instances()).
I
What I'm not sure of at this point is if theres some cursor usage
specific to the MS-SQL dialect that might be external to the
ResultProxyif Rick could comb through that for me that would be
helpful.
The cursor is used pre_exec() if an INSERT statement tries to set a literal
PK on a
On Apr 27, 2008, at 8:55 PM, Rick Morrison wrote:
What I'm not sure of at this point is if theres some cursor usage
specific to the MS-SQL dialect that might be external to the
ResultProxyif Rick could comb through that for me that would be
helpful.
The cursor is used pre_exec()
It is possible we could re-introduce check for open cursors as a
pool events extension. It would raise an error if any connection is
returned with associated cursors still opened and could track down
issues like these.
That would be a great diagnostic tool for this: It's hard to track
Our Pylons setup emails every traceback error to our developers,
with about 80 users, we've been getting a couple of hundred error
emails a day, almost all with this same error (Tomorrow we will have
about 1200 users on our system). The following is an excerpt of the
traceback message. Every
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:39:25 -0400
Kyle Schaffrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:23:24 -0400
Michael Bayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But yes its probably how that section should be done anyway so
that ShardedQuery so that the iterative framework provided by
On Apr 27, 2008, at 9:58 PM, BruceC wrote:
I don't know whether this helps, but many thanks for looking at the
issue :)
unfortunately it doesnt say much at all. You're not sharing a Session
between multiple threads, right ?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
On Apr 28, 2008, at 12:02 AM, Michael Bayer wrote:
On Apr 27, 2008, at 9:58 PM, BruceC wrote:
I don't know whether this helps, but many thanks for looking at the
issue :)
unfortunately it doesnt say much at all. You're not sharing a Session
between multiple threads, right ?
and by
15 matches
Mail list logo
