Someone has recently made this claim without any supporting evidence,
and I responded with an example of the compiler/ORM running against
Oracle, truncating a long generated name, which had been aliased
twice, into a properly truncated name, results returned just fine.
This is a very
I was trying to do something yesterday evening and I found something
strange. After running this code:
q = Q()
for j in range(1):
a = A()
a.Q = q
a.C = WC()
I get this graph edges (tuples):
import pprint
ppp = pprint.PrettyPrinter(indent=4)
ppp.pprint([(x.class_,
i've made something but before u jump on my overly generic ways of
coding, here the matrix to be tested:
matrix/possibilities:
A. mangling: for those longer, try 2 of same kind (in one parent),
both same size, beginning same but diff. at the end, with diff after
MAXLEN, e.g. sometable(
Svilen and Michael,
Thanks for all the pointers. Will look into this all and read up some
more on declarative (I like its approach, having things together) and do
some more test scripts for my application.
Werner
Michael Bayer wrote:
that __repr__ is pretty tortured too; a typical
On Jun 23, 2008, at 4:18 AM, Marin wrote:
I was trying to do something yesterday evening and I found something
strange. After running this code:
q = Q()
for j in range(1):
a = A()
a.Q = q
a.C = WC()
I get this graph edges (tuples):
import pprint
ppp =
On Jun 23, 2008, at 3:27 AM, Egil Möller wrote:
I will make an effort to port them to the latest version before
posting them to trac.
OKbut I am *really really* curious what the bugs are. It would
be better for me to have a look to see what the preferred approach is
for them
Hi list,
Is there really no easier/nicer way to get a count of items alongside
object results than the one described at:
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/05/ormtutorial.html#datamapping_joins_subqueries
?
from sqlalchemy.sql import func
stmt = session.query(Address.user_id,
On Jun 23, 2008, at 10:27 AM, Gaetan de Menten wrote:
Hi list,
Is there really no easier/nicer way to get a count of items alongside
object results than the one described at:
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/05/ormtutorial.html#datamapping_joins_subqueries
?
different SQL, or different
On Jun 23, 2008, at 2:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i can make several tests about how the combination of tablename,
colname, seqname, indexname alone and some of them in pairs behave
around max_single_name_len=64 - below, at and above it. i've no iea
about schemas but i guess they can be
We have an application (Turbogears) that uses multiple databases.
A main (postgres/mysql) database for most data (TG + application) and
another
datbase (sqlite) used for tracking some file info.
The main database uses the standard turbogears session, however
we ran into trouble using the
In my application, a lot of models have a deleted_at field which is
either null or set to a date. And in most places where i select from
those models, i only need the instances where deleted_at is null. Of
course, i can do it manually by adding just another filter_at on every
ORM operation,
On Monday 23 June 2008 18:23:27 Michael Bayer wrote:
On Jun 23, 2008, at 2:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i can make several tests about how the combination of tablename,
colname, seqname, indexname alone and some of them in pairs
behave around max_single_name_len=64 - below, at and above
On Jun 23, 1:08 pm, kris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are we setting up the multiple database situation incorrectly for 0.5?
0.4 had an implicit behavior whereby when you hit the lazy loader on
an attribute for an object that was not bound to a session, it would
automatically bind to the
using 0.5:
from sqlalchemy.orm import Query, sessionmaker
class MyQuery(Query):
def __new__(cls, entities, **kwargs):
if hasattr(entities[0], 'deleted_at'):
return Query(entities,
**kwargs).filter_by(deleted_at=None)
else:
return object.__new__(cls)
14 matches
Mail list logo
