On Jun 23, 2008, at 2:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i can make several tests about how the combination of tablename, > colname, seqname, indexname alone and some of them in pairs behave > around max_single_name_len=64 - below, at and above it. i've no iea > about schemas but i guess they can be added later. well I'm going off this doc: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/datatype-numeric.html#DATATYPE-SERIAL which doesn't say what to do when the identifiers are too long. I think we'd be more immune to issues in this area if we just do a little reflection from pg_catalog to get the actual sequence name. This is a straightforward but somewhat tedious enhancement to the PG module. The current workaround of just putting in your own Sequence() doesn't seem too terrible to me. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
