Thank you for your reply.
Is this available for version 0.6 only ?
On Jun 3, 5:41 pm, Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com wrote:
On Jun 3, 2010, at 5:06 AM, Jan-Eric wrote:
Hi!
I have a problem with constructing a custom SQL statement.
I would like to create the following SQL
-Original Message-
From: sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
[mailto:sqlalch...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael Bayer
Sent: 03 June 2010 19:38
To: sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [sqlalchemy] SA on MySQL 3.23
On Jun 3, 2010, at 1:15 PM, King Simon-NFHD78 wrote:
Hi,
its in 0.5. Make sure you use the passed in compiler to compile
sub-expressions, i.e. compiler.process(expr) instead of str(expr).
On Jun 4, 2010, at 5:45 AM, Jan-Eric wrote:
Thank you for your reply.
Is this available for version 0.6 only ?
On Jun 3, 5:41 pm, Michael Bayer
On Jun 4, 2010, at 6:54 AM, King Simon-NFHD78 wrote:
I'll happily try any suggestions you've got :-)
I couldn't see anything in the MySQL docs that suggested an alternative
to the CAST function, so it seems reasonable to just omit it for older
MySQL servers. I applied the attached patch,
Hi All,
For a while I have been toying with the idea of developing/running a
database (postgresql backend) driven WSGI app using an async python
WSGI server such as gevent.
Now that the newer psycopg2 (=2.2.0) drivers provide coroutine
support (via a hook which makes c extension database
Sorry, meant to reply to you Michael... ended up replying to myself!
---
Firstly, apologies if I'm demanding too much but basically I'm quite a
beginner at Python programming and this is for a University project,
which is why I'm keen to get this done (due in a few days!). So I hope
you won't
-Original Message-
From: sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
[mailto:sqlalch...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael Bayer
Sent: 04 June 2010 14:42
To: sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [sqlalchemy] SA on MySQL 3.23
On Jun 4, 2010, at 6:54 AM, King Simon-NFHD78 wrote:
Hi,
I'm finally adapting our codebase to SqlAlchemy 0.6, and I've found a
couple of breaking changes that are not documented in
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/wiki/06Migration
First, ResultProxy.keys is now a method returning a list, not a list-
valued attribute, so expressions like k in
Hi,
if I declaratively map a class with a mix-in and with a __table__
definition that contains the columns in the mix-in, like so:
class MyMixin(object):
id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
def foo(self):
return 'bar'+str(self.id)
class MyModel(Base,MyMixin):
__table__ =
Say I track Inventory with three classes: Product, Inventory, Location
This any() expression yields the following output.
session.query(Product).filter(Product.inventory.any(Location.siteid==u'EAST')).all()
SELECT ...
FROM products
WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM inventory, locations
WHERE
On 06/04/2010 03:13 PM, Kent wrote:
Say I track Inventory with three classes: Product, Inventory, Location
This any() expression yields the following output.
session.query(Product).filter(Product.inventory.any(Location.siteid==u'EAST')).all()
SELECT ...
FROM products
WHERE EXISTS (SELECT
Nice. That might come in very useful, thanks.
However, I can't quite get the second approach to work:
exq=DBSession.query(Inventory).join(Location).filter(Location.siteid=='03').correlate(Product).subquery()
DBSession.query(Product).filter(exists(exq)).all()
Traceback (most recent call last):
On 06/03/2010 02:33 PM, Az wrote:
Firstly, apologies if I'm demanding too much but basically I'm quite a
beginner at Python programming and this is for a University project,
which is why I'm keen to get this done (due in a few days!). So I hope
you won't mind me asking some questions that may
On Jun 4, 2010, at 1:16 PM, Gunnlaugur Briem wrote:
Hi,
I'm finally adapting our codebase to SqlAlchemy 0.6, and I've found a
couple of breaking changes that are not documented in
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/wiki/06Migration
First, ResultProxy.keys is now a method returning a list,
On Jun 4, 2010, at 3:21 PM, Gunnlaugur Briem wrote:
Hi,
if I declaratively map a class with a mix-in and with a __table__
definition that contains the columns in the mix-in, like so:
class MyMixin(object):
id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
def foo(self):
return
On Jun 4, 2010, at 12:43 PM, King Simon-NFHD78 wrote:
If you're more comfortable with a version that just doesn't call
_check_unicode_returns, or that catches the exception, either would be
fine with me. I just sent the first thing I tried that seemed to work. I
agree that silently
On 06/04/2010 03:56 PM, Kent Bower wrote:
Nice. That might come in very useful, thanks.
However, I can't quite get the second approach to work:
exq=DBSession.query(Inventory).join(Location).filter(Location.siteid=='03').correlate(Product).subquery()
On Jun 4, 9:23 pm, Michael Bayer mike...@zzzcomputing.com wrote:
as long as all tests pass it is fine. If you could give me a patch that
includes a test for this in test_declarative, that would be supremely helpful
(if you want to make a trac ticket and target it at the 0.6.2 milestone).
18 matches
Mail list logo
