Apologies if I'm missing this is the docs somewhere, but I can't figure it
out. Suppose I have a many-to-many relationship between A and B, and that
I'd like have the various B's that a particular A points to ordered by
B.ordinal (i.e. in the examples below, I'd like A.bs to be sorted to
Since this is the association object pattern, I’ll describe that first. The
pattern there is a little complicated, but if you can go with a straight
many-to-many, it is then much easier.
The relationship as specified here is from A to A_to_B. If I have an “A” row
loaded into some_a, and
Thank you. This was very helpful.
One non-trivial thing that stumped me for a while is that if B is derived
from a B_base using joined-table inheritance, and the order variable is in
the base table B_base, then it seems one must include B_base explicitly --
as highlighted below.
from
On Feb 27, 2014, at 9:23 PM, Seth P spadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you. This was very helpful.
One non-trivial thing that stumped me for a while is that if B is derived
from a B_base using joined-table inheritance, and the order variable is in
the base table B_base, then it seems one
Good point, but unfortunately, unless I'm missing something, including only
B_base and removing B from the join doesn't seem to work when A is also
derived (using joined-table inheritance) from B_base (which is my actual
situation, despite what the nomenclature here suggest).
On Thursday,
