@googlegroups.com
Subject: [sqlalchemy] Re: New instance ExtraStat with identity key
(...) conflicts with persistent instance ExtraStat
I keep thinking one of my relatives has emailed me when you post here
and I get all excited. Any chance you can change your name ? :-)
2008/12/2 Doug Farrell [EMAIL
, November 29, 2008 9:28 PM
To: sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
Subject: [sqlalchemy] Re: New instance ExtraStat with identity key (...)
conflicts with persistent instance ExtraStat
Simon's suggestion about the duplicate name still holds. Your
relation from Stat-ExtraStat currently needs to be one
design skills. I'll update my code to try this out.
Again,
Thanks!
Doug
From: sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Bayer
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2008 9:28 PM
To: sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
Subject: [sqlalchemy] Re: New instance ExtraStat
: New instance ExtraStat with identity key
(...) conflicts with persistent instance ExtraStat
What was your justification of changing the name of my thread to a
completely different topic instead of starting a new thread?
I don't think thats good etiquette.
On Nov 29, 5:22 am, Doug
Simon's suggestion about the duplicate name still holds. Your
relation from Stat-ExtraStat currently needs to be one-to-one since
you cannot have more than one ExtraStat referencing a single Stat, due
to the PK constraint on ExtraStat.name. The error is raising at the
point of query()
-Original Message-
From: sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Farrell
Sent: 28 November 2008 18:22
To: sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
Subject: [sqlalchemy] New instance ExtraStat with identity
key (...) conflicts with persistent instance ExtraStat
What was your justification of changing the name of my thread to a
completely different topic instead of starting a new thread?
I don't think thats good etiquette.
On Nov 29, 5:22 am, Doug Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having a problem with a new instance of a relation
What was your justification of changing the name of my thread to a
completely different topic instead of starting a new thread?
I don't think thats good etiquette.
On Nov 29, 5:22 am, Doug Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having a problem with a new instance of a relation