On 06/04/2013 11:22 PM, Warwick Prince wrote:
On 06/04/2013 10:46 PM, Michael Bayer wrote:
There's a long standing ticket to add support for comments, at least at the DDL
level. I don't think anyone has looked into what level of support we get from
the various backends as far as reflecti
> On 06/04/2013 10:46 PM, Michael Bayer wrote:
>> There's a long standing ticket to add support for comments, at least at the
>> DDL level. I don't think anyone has looked into what level of support we
>> get from the various backends as far as reflection.
>>
>> So its something the library h
On 06/04/2013 10:46 PM, Michael Bayer wrote:
There's a long standing ticket to add support for comments, at least at the DDL
level. I don't think anyone has looked into what level of support we get from
the various backends as far as reflection.
So its something the library has room for, b
There's a long standing ticket to add support for comments, at least at the DDL
level. I don't think anyone has looked into what level of support we get from
the various backends as far as reflection.
So its something the library has room for, but it's an open item for now. The
four-year-old
Hi Michael
I'm toying with the idea of embedding some metadata into the comments on
columns and/or the table comment. Is there a way to reliably read the comment
from the column definition via reflection across all dialects that would
support a comment at a column level? Also, can I read the
