:
*From: *"Piotr Dobrogost" <p...@2016.groups.google.dobrogost.net>
*To: *"sqlalchemy" <sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com>
*Sent: *Wednesday, April 13, 2016 1:50:19 PM
*Subject: *Re: [sqlalchemy] Suppo
On 04/13/2016 07:50 AM, Piotr Dobrogost wrote:
Mike,
Thanks for your reply!
On Wednesday, April 13, 2016 at 1:15:32 PM UTC+2, Mike Bayer wrote:
We've not started supporting new oracle 12c features as of yet, in
this case it might be possible to get it working with some dialect
- Original Message -
From: "Piotr Dobrogost" <p...@2016.groups.google.dobrogost.net>
To: "sqlalchemy" <sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 1:50:19 PM
Subject: Re: [sqlalchemy] Support for Oracle 12c auto increment (IDENTIT
Mike,
Thanks for your reply!
On Wednesday, April 13, 2016 at 1:15:32 PM UTC+2, Mike Bayer wrote:
>
> We've not started supporting new oracle 12c features as of yet, in this
> case it might be possible to get it working with some dialect flags since
> we already use "returning" to get at the
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 07:15:27AM -0400, Mike Bayer wrote:
> We've not started supporting new oracle 12c features as of yet, in this
> case it might be possible to get it working with some dialect flags since
> we already use "returning" to get at the newly generated primary key,
> although
We've not started supporting new oracle 12c features as of yet, in this
case it might be possible to get it working with some dialect flags since
we already use "returning" to get at the newly generated primary key,
although testing would be needed and other assumptions in the dialect might
get in
Hi all!
At
http://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/latest/dialects/oracle.html#auto-increment-behavior
we read that:
"With the Oracle dialect, a sequence must always be explicitly specified to
enable autoincrement."
However, starting with version 12c Oracle supports autoincrement columns
(see update
