Just give it a try and see what happens. You just need to enable the shared
cache once.
I'd think the blocking would not be any different with the shared cache
enabled. But you should get reduced I/O load since the cache will be larger and
accessible to all threads.
HTH,
Ken
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 07:09:29PM -0600, John Stanton scratched on the wall:
> Use this sequence -
>
>sqlite3_prepare_v2
> while not finished
>sqlite3_bind_xxx
>sqlite3_step
> until SQLITE_DONE
>sqlite3_reset
> repeat
>sqlite3_finalize
>
> The
"Fabiano Sidler"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Igor Tandetnik schrieb:
>> You don't have a single row in dbapp view that has fields='surname'.
>> The only record you have is one where fields='name,surname'. So no
>> row matches condition, and thus no row gets
Igor Tandetnik schrieb:
> You don't have a single row in dbapp view that has fields='surname'. The
> only record you have is one where fields='name,surname'. So no row
> matches condition, and thus no row gets deleted. Your trigger never even
> runs.
That's weird. So Sqlite first does read
"Fabiano Sidler"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> sqlite> select * from dbapp;
> employees|name,surname
> sqlite> delete from dbapp where tablename='employees' and
> fields='surname';
> sqlite> delete from dbapp where tablename='employees' and
> fields='surname';
>
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 22:06:12 +0900, you wrote:
>The command line is
>in my email and its result. I don't think there is any mention of in-memory
>database in the feature list either. I thought it might help to improve the
>documentation.
I agree the http://sqlite.org/quickstart.html page
should
Ok, I've removed that nested DELETE command. Now I have still the problem
that I can't delete tablenames with multiple field entries. The full sql
I have is as follows:
---
create table dbapp_tablenames (
tablenameID integer primary key,
tablename text not null unique on conflict ignore
);
"Fred Janon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> and since it doesn't show a file, I presume that sqlite does actually
> support in-memory temporary databases?
Yes.
> Where is is documented?
http://sqlite.org/c3ref/open.html
the paragraph that mentions :memory:
I have a heavily threaded app (I know, evil) where there might be 50 threads
accessing 10 databases. Each thread always calls sqlite3_open when it
starts working with a database and sqlite3_close when it's done (so no
sharing of handles across threads). A thread might have two or more handles
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 22:06:12 +0900, "Fred Janon"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Thanks, I did already read that page and all the other ones. I was asking a
>question about SQLLite3.exe very precisely, I thought. The command line is
>in my email and its result. I don't think there is any mention of
Hello,
Is there a way to determine current lock state of a database? More
specifically, I’d like to be able to tell whether the main database in the
current session is under SHARED lock, or under RESERVED/PENDING/EXCLUSIVE lock.
This is needed for unit tests and assertions.
Thanks!
Thanks, I did already read that page and all the other ones. I was asking a
question about SQLLite3.exe very precisely, I thought. The command line is
in my email and its result. I don't think there is any mention of in-memory
database in the feature list either. I thought it might help to improve
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 06:44:45PM +0900, Fred Janon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I read the documentation, features and faq and could not find anything that
> specifies where (which directory) the database file is stored. I launched
> sqlite3.exe on windows without a database name, using the '.databases'
>
Hi,
I read the documentation, features and faq and could not find anything that
specifies where (which directory) the database file is stored. I launched
sqlite3.exe on windows without a database name, using the '.databases'
command, I get:
sqlite> .databases
seq name file
---
14 matches
Mail list logo
