On 03/03/2011, at 11:53 AM, Rami Abughazaleh wrote:
> Trying to insert a new row in a table that has a column specifically set to
> the rowid data type
There is no rowid data type. To alias rowid you need to just type it as integer
primary key.
> will cause an error message like "value cannot
Hi.
Trying to insert a new row in a table that has a column specifically set to
the rowid data type will cause an error message like "value cannot be null".
CREATE TABLE [test] (
[Id] ROWID NOT NULL,
[Name] nvarchar(50) NOT NULL,
[Value] nvarchar(256) NOT NULL
);
INSERT INTO test
On 2 Mar 2011, at 9:46pm, Dave Dyer wrote:
> If the host is OSX 10.4, it fails.
>
> I swear it used to work in 10.4 too
It's worth noting that 10.4.0 might not work the same as 10.4.1. Please
upgrade to the latest version of 10.4 that's available and try it.
> Is there any change in sqlite
The configuration I'm interested in has:
Database resident on a windows 7 file system
sqlite binary based on sqlite 3.7.3
If the host is OSX 10.6, it works.
If the host is OSX 10.4, it fails.
I swear it used to work in 10.4 too, but lacking a time
machine, it's hard to prove. I'm
What I meant was that the tracker edit is one time only... I can't add
additional comments/corrections to any issue after creation.
Original Message
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> We're currently trying to work out a Contributor License Agreement for
> System.Data.SQLite -
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 12:37:44PM -0500, Pavel Ivanov scratched on the wall:
> I believe sqlite3_get_autocommit is what you need:
> http://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/get_autocommit.html.
Yes. More specifically, if you *are* in auto-commit mode, then by
definition you are NOT in an explicit
On 2 Mar 2011, at 5:32pm, Philip Graham Willoughby wrote:
> I would like to close the database connection if it is safe to do so when my
> app is suspended, so that the -wal file can be erased saving the user some
> space, and also because I hear that improves the efficiency of subsequent
>
I believe sqlite3_get_autocommit is what you need:
http://www.sqlite.org/c3ref/get_autocommit.html.
Pavel
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Philip Graham Willoughby
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I use SQLite in an iPhone application, and for my own convenience I have
phil,
i think the easiest way is more or less like you said. issue the
BEGIN, and if you get an ok back, you aren't in a transaction, so you just
commit and close the db. otherwise you can wait and check later.
there may be a better way do it, but that is all i know of.
Hi all,
I use SQLite in an iPhone application, and for my own convenience I have
wrapped it up in an object-oriented wrapper of my own devising.
I would like to close the database connection if it is safe to do so when my
app is suspended, so that the -wal file can be erased saving the user
On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 09:53:51AM +0100, alexis bialot scratched on the wall:
> hello,
>
> this looks to me like a bug but maybe this is just my misunderstanding.
You might run an integrity check on the database file and verify
any indexes you have are correct and include all rows. If
On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 03:21:58PM +, David Gilbert scratched on the wall:
> for(jj=0; jjsqlite3_snprintf(512-nCell,[nCell],"
> %f",(double)cell.aCoord[jj].f);
>
> That's against 3.7.4 but it looks like it's the same in the trunk.
>
> With that change the
Can you send me the database that demonstrates this problem, via private
email, please?
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 3:53 AM, alexis bialot wrote:
> hello,
>
> this looks to me like a bug but maybe this is just my misunderstanding.
>
> the databases shema is the trac database
On 2 Mar 2011, at 3:26pm, alexis bialot wrote:
> as expected, the lines for iter63 and up disapear : there are no
> corresponding lines on the right hand side
Okay, what you write appears to be correct, but requires more intimate
knowledge of the inner workings of SQLite than I have. I'll
hello
thanks for your quick reply
> On 2 Mar 2011, at 8:53am, alexis bialot wrote:
>
>> i do not believe it should be possible that a query with a left join
>> yields less results
>> than the exact same query with an inner join.
> Do you have any null fields anywhere in either TABLE ? Nulls make
Thanks for the feedback.
We're currently trying to work out a Contributor License Agreement for
System.Data.SQLite - probably something along the lines of
http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/trunk/www/copyright-release.html
used for Fossil.
You need to login to the Fossil site, even if only as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The approach should be:
Create a bunch of symetric keys (keep them in your process memory -
anyone with root access or same user might still be able to capture them)
save those sym-keys into your db protected by a PubKey (also called
a
On 1 Mar 2011, at 22:01, Jeff Archer wrote:
> Hi all, and thanks in advance for you help.
>
> And this select which I would like to modify to only return lowest X,Y value
> for each ImageID.
>
> select Defects.DefectID
> , Defects.ImageID
> , Defects.AnalysisID
> , Defects.X
> , Defects.Y
> ,
On 2 Mar 2011, at 8:53am, alexis bialot wrote:
> i do not believe it should be possible that a query with a left join
> yields less results
> than the exact same query with an inner join.
Do you have any null fields anywhere in either TABLE ? Nulls make analysis of
what's happening very
Inline...
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 04:37:13PM -0700, Carl Baldwin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've used sqlite for a number of years now. I ran in to something over the
> week-end like nothing I've experienced before. An application linked
> against 3.6.18 corrupted one of my databases. The
hello,
this looks to me like a bug but maybe this is just my misunderstanding.
the databases shema is the trac database schema visible here
http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracDev/DatabaseSchema
but i do not believe the schema is really relevant to the point
the problematic clause is "and
Hi,
I ran the sqlite3 test suite on ARM Linux (Ubuntu) and got a set of
failures in the
rtree2 set of tests, including the following set:
rtree2-rtree_i32.1.3 rtree2-rtree_i32.1.5.0.2
rtree2-rtree_i32.1.5.10.2 rtree2-rtree_i32.1.5.20.2
rtree2-rtree_i32.1.5.30.2 rtree2-rtree_i32.1.5.40.2
On 1 mars 2011, at 21:11, Mickey Mestel wrote:
> hi all,
>
> i've just discovered that the bug is there when compiling with the LLVM
> compiler 1.6, which comes as a standard compiler with the iOS SDK, and is the
> direction that Apple is moving towards.
>
> the problem is NOT
23 matches
Mail list logo