Hi folks.
Just wondering if the tables will remain if I configure SQLite to install the
64 bit version on Snow Leopard over my current 32 bit version.
Cheers
_
Rich in Toronto
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Dear,
I want use SQLite, but my program language is Java. And thewww.sqlite.org
not supply API for Java. What should I do?
Thank you!
Yin Lijie
___
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
On 2 Aug 2011, at 1:10am, Igor Sereda wrote:
> To my humble knowledge, operations with NULL have well-defined semantics,
> both in SQL-you-name-it standards and in SQLite. "A < B" may have three
> results - TRUE, FALSE and NULL. It doesn't matter whether you can make any
> sense of it - it's the
Simon, Michael -
To my humble knowledge, operations with NULL have well-defined semantics,
both in SQL-you-name-it standards and in SQLite. "A < B" may have three
results - TRUE, FALSE and NULL. It doesn't matter whether you can make any
sense of it - it's the spec ;)
Therefore I'm trying to
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 12:58, Simon Slavin wrote:
These two go together. Multi-master replication (one example of which is a
> document store) is relatively easy. Datestamp every value (document) and
> whichever one has the lastest date is the one you want.
>
This is
On 1 Aug 2011, at 10:45pm, Black, Michael (IS) wrote:
> If it's meaningless then shouldn't it be a syntax error?
It's about as meaningless as
X <= maxreal
so it would take quite a lot of processing time to identify it as meaningless.
Not sure as if it's worth the processing time. Any
If it's meaningless then shouldn't it be a syntax error?
Michael D. Black
Senior Scientist
NG Information Systems
Advanced Analytics Directorate
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] on
behalf of Simon Slavin
On 1 Aug 2011, at 9:47pm, Igor Sereda wrote:
> So - who else thinks it's a bug?
The SQL standard says 'NULL' means 'I don't know' or 'value missing' or
something of the kind. So using a comparison like
X > NULL
doesn't mean anything, since there can't be a well-ordering principle for a
Thanks Jay,
That's a good hint about the origin of the problem.
However, you refer to the sort order, but the problem is with WHERE
statement. Since numeric comparison with NULL always evaluates to NULL (see
section 4.0 of the link you gave me), a statement like "SELECT * FROM table
WHERE
2011/8/1 Simon Slavin :
> I'm sorry Alexey, I was trying to be funny and failed. Your question is very
> important for this situation.
Oh, I'm sorry! My english is bad by night :)
--
Best regards, Alexey Pechnikov.
http://pechnikov.tel/
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 12:34:33PM -0700, Igor Sereda scratched on the wall:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm seeing strange input given into xBestIndex method of my virtual table.
>
> I'm maintaining sqlite4java wrapper and I'm trying to upgrade it from SQLite
> 3.7.4 to 3.7.7.1. A couple of failed tests
Hello,
I'm seeing strange input given into xBestIndex method of my virtual table.
I'm maintaining sqlite4java wrapper and I'm trying to upgrade it from SQLite
3.7.4 to 3.7.7.1. A couple of failed tests uncovered that there's a problem
when searching a simple virtual table with constraints that
On 1 Aug 2011, at 7:20pm, Alexey Pechnikov wrote:
> 2011/8/1 Simon Slavin :
>>
>> On 1 Aug 2011, at 6:56pm, Alexey Pechnikov wrote:
>>
>>> 2011/8/1 Black, Michael (IS) :
This is a side-question to this thread...but has anybody every done
2011/8/1 Simon Slavin :
>
> On 1 Aug 2011, at 6:56pm, Alexey Pechnikov wrote:
>
>> 2011/8/1 Black, Michael (IS) :
>>> This is a side-question to this thread...but has anybody every done
>>> row-level locking for edit?
>>
>> What problem are you
On 1 Aug 2011, at 6:56pm, Alexey Pechnikov wrote:
> 2011/8/1 Black, Michael (IS) :
>> This is a side-question to this thread...but has anybody every done
>> row-level locking for edit?
>
> What problem are you solving?
Please stop asking key questions.
Simon.
2011/8/1 Black, Michael (IS) :
> This is a side-question to this thread...but has anybody every done row-level
> locking for edit?
What problem are you solving?
--
Best regards, Alexey Pechnikov.
http://pechnikov.tel/
___
On 1 Aug 2011, at 2:10pm, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Marco Bambini wrote:
>
>> Why this valid statement:
>>
>> CREATE TABLE USER(
>> id text, -- the id of the user
>> nametext-- the name of the user
>> );
>>
>> gives me
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Marco Bambini wrote:
> Why this valid statement:
>
> CREATE TABLE USER(
>id text, -- the id of the user
>nametext-- the name of the user
> );
>
> gives me a syntax error with sqlite 3.7.6.3?
>
Works for me.
>
>
I think database will go corrupt if the power goes off during the process of
checkpoint. Database will remain intact even if wal file is lost due to power
failure.
For embedded devices its a balance between flash life, db performance and ram
memory usage.
Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel
Why this valid statement:
CREATE TABLE USER(
id text, -- the id of the user
nametext-- the name of the user
);
gives me a syntax error with sqlite 3.7.6.3?
Thanks.
--
Marco Bambini
http://www.sqlabs.com
___
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 8:45 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the detailed explanation.
> My original question was more in relation to the .db-wal file. I guess the
> same discussion is applicable to the db-wal file also?. In my project, in
> all probability one writer and
Hi,
Thanks for the detailed explanation.
My original question was more in relation to the .db-wal file. I guess the same
discussion is applicable to the db-wal file also?. In my project, in all
probability one writer and multiple readers. Hence the chances of corruption is
greatly reduced.
One
This is a side-question to this thread...but has anybody every done row-level
locking for edit?
I can see it:
create table t(id int primary key,stuff text, lock l);
insert into t values(1,'stuff1',0);
select * from t where id=1 and lock=0; // or drop lock to get all and check
lock!=0 to
I am out of the office until 22/08/2011.
Note: This is an automated response to your message "Re: [sqlite] How to
convert a database with FTS2 to FTS3/4?" sent on 01/08/2011 4.32.58.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Sreekumar TP wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Inorder to suit the needs of my embedded device, I have changed the
> location
> of the .db-wal file from the location of the db file to tmpfs. Does sqlite
> make assumptions(persistence etc) based on the
Where would I use the SQLITE_OMIT_* flags?
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Roger Binns wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/31/2011 09:14 AM, Baruch Burstein wrote:
> > I can use Linux if it makes it easier,
>
> This is how I build which
26 matches
Mail list logo