te.org]
> On Behalf Of Jens Alfke
> Sent: Monday, 27 February, 2017 17:44
> To: SQLite mailing list
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Beginning of release testing for version 3.17.0
>
>
> > On Feb 27, 2017, at 3:51 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
> wrote:
> >
> > Are
> On Feb 27, 2017, at 3:51 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
> wrote:
>
> Are you somehow depending on sqlite3 for a SHA-1 implementation? That would
> be strange.
I’m genuinely mystified by this statement. Why would the extension be included
if not for people to use it?
(I’m not using this extension mys
On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, Jens Alfke wrote:
SHA-1 is now definitely too weak, so it would be good for SQLite to offer an
alternative that’s still safe(r).)
Are you somehow depending on sqlite3 for a SHA-1 implementation?
That would be strange.
The SHA-1 implementation in SQLite is surely intend
> On Feb 7, 2017, at 7:39 AM, no...@null.net wrote:
>
> Nice to see a sha1 extension included with SQLite now.
… Just in time for SHA-1 to be declared officially broken: there’s now an
effective mechanism to generate collisions (it only takes 100 GPU-years), and
at least two colliding files ar
2017-02-09 18:46 GMT+01:00 Roger Binns :
> On 08/02/17 11:41, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> > OK, glad to help. What should I do?
>
> It is nicest if whatever software/tools you already have also has some
> sort of testing (ideally automated, but a manual checklist works too).
>
> Then run the testing
On 08/02/17 11:41, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> OK, glad to help. What should I do?
It is nicest if whatever software/tools you already have also has some
sort of testing (ideally automated, but a manual checklist works too).
Then run the testing with the existing version of SQLite, and repeat
with
2017-02-08 16:49 GMT+01:00 Richard Hipp :
> On 2/8/17, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> >
> > I use SQLite, but only for relative simple things. Is there a way I can
> > help with testing, or do you need a ‘heavy’ application to do that?
> >
>
> All tests are welcomed.
>
OK, glad to help. What should
On 2/8/17, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
>
> I use SQLite, but only for relative simple things. Is there a way I can
> help with testing, or do you need a ‘heavy’ application to do that?
>
All tests are welcomed.
The extensive SQLite test suite probably already covers most of the
"simple things". But
2017-02-07 15:32 GMT+01:00 Richard Hipp :
> In a few days, we will begin the official release testing for SQLite
> version 3.17.0.
>
> A recent snapshot of the code can be found on the
> https://www.sqlite.org/download.html page or directly from Fossil at
> https://www.sqlite.org/src/timeline
>
>
Just thinking out loud for those of us that use the DLL provided in your
site...
It would be nice that this email would be accompanied by ready made DLLs
also. Perhaps under,
https://www.sqlite.org/draft/ [1]download.html [2]
This is because some of us may not have the time to create the DLL
On Tue Feb 07, 2017 at 09:32:18AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
> A draft change log can be seen at
> https://www.sqlite.org/draft/releaselog/3_17_0.html
Nice to see a sha1 extension included with SQLite now. I don't see a
matching SQLITE_ENABLE_SHA1 to add it statically (if that is what the
SQLIT
In a few days, we will begin the official release testing for SQLite
version 3.17.0.
A recent snapshot of the code can be found on the
https://www.sqlite.org/download.html page or directly from Fossil at
https://www.sqlite.org/src/timeline
A draft change log can be seen at
https://www.sqlite.org/
12 matches
Mail list logo
