yes, after reflecting on it that may be the easiest and less processor
intensive...
Thanks,
Scott
John Elrick wrote:
Scott Derrick wrote:
I have an application that is inserting a record every second. There
are thousands of periods from a few seconds to hours long where the
data in all
On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 09:20:28 -0700, Gerry wrote:
>Kees Nuyt wrote:
>> On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 07:53:08 -0600, Scott wrote:
>>
>>> I have an application that is inserting a record every second. There
>>> are thousands of periods from a few seconds to hours long where the data
>>> in all the
Scott Derrick wrote:
I have an application that is inserting a record every second. There
are thousands of periods from a few seconds to hours long where the
data in all the columns is identical thus causing hundreds of
thousands of duplicate rows.
Is there a way to set up the INSERT
Kees Nuyt wrote:
On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 07:53:08 -0600, you wrote:
I have an application that is inserting a record every second. There
are thousands of periods from a few seconds to hours long where the data
in all the columns is identical thus causing hundreds of thousands of
duplicate
On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 07:53:08 -0600, you wrote:
>I have an application that is inserting a record every second. There
>are thousands of periods from a few seconds to hours long where the data
>in all the columns is identical thus causing hundreds of thousands of
>duplicate rows.
>
>Is there a
I have an application that is inserting a record every second. There
are thousands of periods from a few seconds to hours long where the data
in all the columns is identical thus causing hundreds of thousands of
duplicate rows.
Is there a way to set up the INSERT statement to allow the
6 matches
Mail list logo