Re: [sqlite] sqlite - select/read only version

2007-03-06 Thread William F Pearson III
A smaller dll doesn't always mean a faster one. In fact enabling compiler optimizations generally make a faster executable, but often lead to an increase in binary size. I think a read only SQLite may be faster because of locks and other instructions, and it would be safer in a cgi-bin

Re: [sqlite] sqlite - select/read only version

2007-03-06 Thread jp
Sqlite's size is perfect as it is, but I have a couple of apps where an even smaller "reader" could be used: 1. A cgi-bin based application, hosted at a third party place - no fast-cgi, no registering isapi dlls, etc. just plain cgi-bin which gets loaded/executed every time it is called (win32 +

Re: [sqlite] sqlite - select/read only version

2007-03-06 Thread drh
jp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anybody tried to build a query-only (select only) > version of sqlite? > > I need to make a read-only version, without all the > CREATE xxx, INSERT, DELETE, UPDATE, etc., for > reporting purposes, which in theory should result in a > significantly smaller

[sqlite] sqlite - select/read only version

2007-03-06 Thread jp
Has anybody tried to build a query-only (select only) version of sqlite? I need to make a read-only version, without all the CREATE xxx, INSERT, DELETE, UPDATE, etc., for reporting purposes, which in theory should result in a significantly smaller .dll. Just like Acrobat has Acrobat Reader, I